Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2015

01-07-2015

Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment

Authors: Lindsay A. Bliss, Catherine J. Yang, Tara S. Kent, Sing Chau Ng, Jonathan F. Critchlow, Jennifer F. Tseng

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis is the second most common gastrointestinal diagnosis mandating urgent operation in the U.S. The current state of adult appendectomy, including patient and hospital characteristics, complications, and predictors for complications, are unknown.

Methods

Retrospective review of U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003–2011 for appendectomy in ≥18-year-olds was performed. Primary outcomes measures included postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient mortality. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ2, trend analyses by Cochran–Armitage. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for predictors of developing complications.

Results

1,663,238 weighted appendectomy discharges occurred. Over the study period, complications increased from 3.2 to 3.8 % (p < 0.0001), but the overall mortality decreased from 0.14 to 0.09 % (p < 0.0001) and mean LOS decreased from 3.1 to 2.6 days (p < 0.0001). The proportion of laparoscopic appendectomy increased over time, 41.7–80.1 % (p < 0.0001). Patients were increasingly older (≥65 years: 9.4–11.6 %, p < 0.0001), more obese (3.8–8.9 %, p < 0.0001), and with more comorbidities (Elixhauser score ≥3: 4.7–9.8 %, p < 0.0001). After adjustment, independent predictors for postoperative complications included: open surgery (OR 1.5, 95 % C.I. 1.4–1.5), male sex (OR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.5–1.6), black race (vs. white: OR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.4–1.6), perforated appendix (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 2.7–3.0), greater comorbidity (Elixhauser ≥3 vs. 0, OR 11.3, 95 % CI 10.5–12.1), non-private insurance status (vs. private: Medicaid OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.2–1.4; Medicare OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.6–1.8), increasing age (>52 years vs. ≤27: OR 1.3; 95 % CI 1.2–1.4), and hospital volume (vs. high: low OR 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.3). Predictors of laparoscopic appendectomy were age, ethnicity, insurance status, comorbidities, and hospital location.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is increasing but is unevenly deployed across patient groups. Appendectomy patients were increasingly older, with more comorbidities and with increasing rates of obesity. Black patients and patients with public insurance had less utilization of laparoscopy and inferior outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hilli ZA, Prichard RS, Roche-Nagle G, Leader M, McNamara DA, Deasy J (2009) Emergency appendicectomy in the era of laparoscopy: a one-year audit. Ir J Med Sci 178:473–477PubMedCrossRef Hilli ZA, Prichard RS, Roche-Nagle G, Leader M, McNamara DA, Deasy J (2009) Emergency appendicectomy in the era of laparoscopy: a one-year audit. Ir J Med Sci 178:473–477PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wilson DG, Bond AK, Ladwa N, Sajid MS, Baig MK, Sains P (2013) Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 27:2351–2356PubMedCrossRef Wilson DG, Bond AK, Ladwa N, Sajid MS, Baig MK, Sains P (2013) Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 27:2351–2356PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD001546. doi:10.1002/14651858 Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD001546. doi:10.​1002/​14651858
6.
go back to reference Houchens RL, Elixhauser A. (2006) Using the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample to Estimate Trends. (Updated for 1988–2004). HCUP Methods Series Report #2006-05 Online. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Houchens RL, Elixhauser A. (2006) Using the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample to Estimate Trends. (Updated for 1988–2004). HCUP Methods Series Report #2006-05 Online. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
7.
go back to reference Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI (2000) Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care 38:785–795PubMedCrossRef Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI (2000) Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care 38:785–795PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8–27PubMedCrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8–27PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley E, Jimenez E, Mohan A, Khan RA, Whittle J, Jacobs E, Nanchal R (2011) Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000–2007). Chest 140:1223–1231PubMedCrossRef Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley E, Jimenez E, Mohan A, Khan RA, Whittle J, Jacobs E, Nanchal R (2011) Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000–2007). Chest 140:1223–1231PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Varela JE, Nguyen NT (2011) Disparities in access to basic laparoscopic surgery at U.S. academic medical centers. Surg Endosc 25:1209–1214PubMedCrossRef Varela JE, Nguyen NT (2011) Disparities in access to basic laparoscopic surgery at U.S. academic medical centers. Surg Endosc 25:1209–1214PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N (2013) Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27:1061–1071PubMedCrossRef Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N (2013) Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27:1061–1071PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Southgate E, Vousden N, Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Black S, Zaidi A (2012) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 147:557–562PubMedCrossRef Southgate E, Vousden N, Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Black S, Zaidi A (2012) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 147:557–562PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scarborough JE, Bennett KM, Pappas TN (2012) Racial disparities in outcomes after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 204:11–17PubMedCrossRef Scarborough JE, Bennett KM, Pappas TN (2012) Racial disparities in outcomes after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 204:11–17PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z, Ng SC, McFadden DW, Kent TS, Moser AJ, Callery MP, Tseng JF (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB 16:899–906. doi:10.1111/hpb.12283 PubMedCrossRef Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z, Ng SC, McFadden DW, Kent TS, Moser AJ, Callery MP, Tseng JF (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB 16:899–906. doi:10.​1111/​hpb.​12283 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ferranti F, Corona F, Siani LM, Stefanuto A, Aguzzi D, Santoro E (2012) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis. G Chir 33:263–267PubMed Ferranti F, Corona F, Siani LM, Stefanuto A, Aguzzi D, Santoro E (2012) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis. G Chir 33:263–267PubMed
18.
go back to reference Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66PubMedCrossRef Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment
Authors
Lindsay A. Bliss
Catherine J. Yang
Tara S. Kent
Sing Chau Ng
Jonathan F. Critchlow
Jennifer F. Tseng
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3882-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2015 Go to the issue