Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013

01-07-2013

Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital

Authors: Daniel G. G. Wilson, Amanda K. Bond, Nikhil Ladwa, Muhammad S. Sajid, Mirza K. Baig, Parvinderpal Sains

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of intra-abdominal collections (IACs) in all patients undergoing laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) from April 2009 to October 2011 in a district general hospital with expertise in minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing appendicectomy in the specified time period was carried out. IACs were identified from various in-hospital data resources. Severity of appendicitis was assessed from histology reports.

Results

516 patients were identified, of whom 242 (47 %) underwent OA and 274 (53 %) LA. Twenty-six (5 %) patients were found to have IACs postoperatively. Fifteen (5.5 %) IACs were identified in the laparoscopic group and 11 (4.5 %) in the open group. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of developing IACs in open versus laparoscopic groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, confidence interval (CI) 0.55–2.70, P = 0.63]. Patients were twelve times more likely to develop IACs with an appendix identified as being necrotic or perforated on histology (OR 12.24, CI 5.29–28.32, P < 0.0001). There was a trend towards shorter total hospital stay in the LA (3.58 days, CI 3.0–4.1 days) compared with OA (4.31 days, CI 3.7–4.9 days, P = 0.082) group, although this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Increased rates of IAC following LA have been identified in some studies. Our series shows that, in a centre with adequate MIS experience, the IAC rate following LA is comparable to that of the open approach and should not deter surgeons with adequate support and resources.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925PubMed
2.
go back to reference Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2012) Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175:185–190PubMedCrossRef Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2012) Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175:185–190PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McBurney C (1894) IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–43PubMedCrossRef McBurney C (1894) IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–43PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Litynski GS (1998) Kurt Semm and the fight against skepticism: endoscopic hemostasis, laparoscopic appendectomy, and Semm’s impact on the “laparoscopic revolution”. JSLS 2:309–313PubMed Litynski GS (1998) Kurt Semm and the fight against skepticism: endoscopic hemostasis, laparoscopic appendectomy, and Semm’s impact on the “laparoscopic revolution”. JSLS 2:309–313PubMed
6.
go back to reference Beger HG, Schwarz A, Bergmann U (2003) Progress in gastrointestinal tract surgery: the impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:342–350PubMedCrossRef Beger HG, Schwarz A, Bergmann U (2003) Progress in gastrointestinal tract surgery: the impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:342–350PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205PubMedCrossRef Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129PubMedCrossRef Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208PubMedCrossRef Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Asarias JR, Schlussel AT, Cafasso DE, Carlson TL, Kasprenski MC, Washington EN, Lustik MB, Yamamura MS, Matayoshi EZ, Zagorski SM (2011) Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 25:2678–2683PubMedCrossRef Asarias JR, Schlussel AT, Cafasso DE, Carlson TL, Kasprenski MC, Washington EN, Lustik MB, Yamamura MS, Matayoshi EZ, Zagorski SM (2011) Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 25:2678–2683PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068PubMedCrossRef Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212 discussion 212–203PubMedCrossRef Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212 discussion 212–203PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728 discussion 728–731PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728 discussion 728–731PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, Birch DW (2006) Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surgery 49:397–400 Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, Birch DW (2006) Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surgery 49:397–400
19.
go back to reference Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S (2008) Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 6:374–377PubMedCrossRef Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S (2008) Prevention of intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective study. Int J Surg 6:374–377PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moore CB, Smith RS, Herbertson R, Toevs C (2011) Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg 77:78–80PubMed Moore CB, Smith RS, Herbertson R, Toevs C (2011) Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess? Am Surg 77:78–80PubMed
21.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R, Mavor E (2000) Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 180:456–459 discussion 460–451PubMedCrossRef Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R, Mavor E (2000) Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 180:456–459 discussion 460–451PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Adamson KA, Mulvihill SJ (2004) The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice. J Gastrointest Surg 8:869–873 discussion 873–865PubMedCrossRef Glasgow RE, Adamson KA, Mulvihill SJ (2004) The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice. J Gastrointest Surg 8:869–873 discussion 873–865PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements—September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements—September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lin YY, Shabbir A, So JB (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg Endosc 24:125–130PubMedCrossRef Lin YY, Shabbir A, So JB (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve. Surg Endosc 24:125–130PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66PubMedCrossRef Alvarez C, Voitk AJ (2000) The road to ambulatory laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 179:63–66PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vettoretto N, Agresta F (2011) A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence. Tech Coloproctol 15:1–6PubMedCrossRef Vettoretto N, Agresta F (2011) A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence. Tech Coloproctol 15:1–6PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T (2004) Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Pediatric Surg Int 20:534–537CrossRef Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T (2004) Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Pediatric Surg Int 20:534–537CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201:933–939PubMedCrossRef Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201:933–939PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Singhal V, Jadhav V (2007) Acute appendicitis: are we over diagnosing it? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:766–769PubMedCrossRef Singhal V, Jadhav V (2007) Acute appendicitis: are we over diagnosing it? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:766–769PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–254PubMedCrossRef van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–254PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Siriwardana RC, Renuka S, Kumarage S (2010) Laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic option in evaluating chronic unexplained right iliac fossa pain. Surg Endosc 24:2793–2795PubMedCrossRef Siriwardana RC, Renuka S, Kumarage S (2010) Laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic option in evaluating chronic unexplained right iliac fossa pain. Surg Endosc 24:2793–2795PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:392–394PubMedCrossRef Phillips AW, Jones AE, Sargen K (2009) Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:392–394PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Memon MA (1997) Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:393–402PubMed Memon MA (1997) Review. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: current status. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:393–402PubMed
34.
go back to reference Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, Trias M (2000) Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg 87:536–544PubMedCrossRef Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, Trias M (2000) Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg 87:536–544PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Taffinder NJ, Cruaud P, Catheline JM, Bron M, Champault G (1997) Bacterial contamination of pneumoperitoneum gas in peritonitis and controls: a prospective laparoscopic study. Acta Chir Belg 97:215–216PubMed Taffinder NJ, Cruaud P, Catheline JM, Bron M, Champault G (1997) Bacterial contamination of pneumoperitoneum gas in peritonitis and controls: a prospective laparoscopic study. Acta Chir Belg 97:215–216PubMed
36.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143PubMedCrossRef Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital
Authors
Daniel G. G. Wilson
Amanda K. Bond
Nikhil Ladwa
Muhammad S. Sajid
Mirza K. Baig
Parvinderpal Sains
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2778-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013 Go to the issue