Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014

01-05-2014

Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding

Authors: Peter John Basford, Regi George, Emma Nixon, Tehreem Chaudhuri, Rob Mead, Pradeep Bhandari

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic resection (ER) of sporadic duodenal adenomas (SDAs) is an alternative treatment strategy to surgical excision but carries substantial risks of bleeding. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of SDAs has a high rate of perforation. This study aimed to examine the outcome for ER of SDAs in two large UK centers, both using a novel hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with ESD.

Methods

Prospective endoscopy databases of ER cases were examined for the period January 2005 to December 2012. Records were analyzed for patient demographics, lesion size and morphology, staging investigations, procedural technique, outcomes, histology, complications, and follow-up assessments.

Results

The study included 34 patients. The mean adenoma size was 25 mm. Of the 34 cases, 21 (62 %) were managed by the traditional snare EMR technique, 12 (35 %) by the hybrid EMR–ESD technique, and 1 by full en bloc ESD. Successful resection was achieved in 33 (97 %) of the 34 cases. En bloc resection and recurrence rates did not differ significantly between the cases treated by EMR and those treated by hybrid EMR–ESD. Three episodes of significant delayed bleeding occurred 1–18 days after the procedure. No perforations or deaths occurred. The risk of delayed bleeding was higher for the lesions 30 mm in diameter or larger than for the lesions smaller than 30 mm (33% vs. 0 %; p = 0.003). The risk of delayed bleeding was not related to the ER technique used (EMR, 9.5 %; ESD/hybrid, 7.7 %; p = 0.855).

Conclusions

Endoscopic resection is an effective treatment for SDAs and can avoid the need for open surgery. This is the first series to report the use of a hybrid EMR–ESD technique for the treatment of SDAs in a Western setting. However, this technique did not confer any major outcome benefits over EMR. The risk of delayed bleeding is substantial, and bleeding may occur up to 18 days after the procedure. The risk of delayed bleeding was increased with lesions larger than 30 mm but was not influenced by the endoscopic technique.
Literature
1.
Jepsen JM, Persson M, Jakobsen NO, Christiansen T, Skoubo-Kristensen E, Funch-Jensen P et al (1994) Prospective study of prevalence and endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of duodenal polyps in patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:483–487PubMedCrossRef
2.
Bulow S, Bulow C, Nielsen TF, Karlsen L, Moesgaard F (1995) Centralized registration, prophylactic examination, and treatment results in improved prognosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: results from the Danish Polyposis Register. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:989–993PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Miller JH, Gisvold JJ, Weiland LH, McIlrath DC (1980) Upper gastrointestinal tract: villous tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134:933–936PubMedCrossRef
5.
Sellner F (1990) Investigations on the significance of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the small bowel. Cancer 66:702–715PubMedCrossRef
6.
Witteman BJ, Janssens AR, Griffioen G, Lamers CB (1993) Villous tumours of the duodenum: an analysis of the literature with emphasis on malignant transformation. Neth J Med 42:5–11PubMed
7.
Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Abraham AT (2009) Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:734–738PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
Haglund U, Fork FT, Genell S, Rehnberg O (1985) Villous adenomas in the duodenum. Br J Surg 72:26–27PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Yoshida Y (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors: a single-center experience. Endoscopy 45:136–137PubMedCrossRef
12.
Maruoka D, Arai M, Kishimoto T, Matsumura T, Inoue M, Nakagawa T et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Endoscopy 45:138–141PubMedCrossRef
13.
Jung JH, Choi KD, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Jung HY, Choi KS et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 45:133–135PubMedCrossRef
14.
Lepilliez V, Chemaly M, Ponchon T, Napoleon B, Saurin JC (2008) Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: an efficient technique with a substantial risk of delayed bleeding. Endoscopy 40:806–810PubMedCrossRef
15.
Abbass R, Rigaux J, Al-Kawas FH (2010) Nonampullary duodenal polyps: characteristics and endoscopic management. Gastrointest Endosc 71:754–759PubMedCrossRef
16.
Kedia P, Brensinger C, Ginsberg G (2010) Endoscopic predictors of successful endoluminal eradication in sporadic duodenal adenomas and its acute complications. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1297–1301PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kim HK, Chung WC, Lee BI, Cho YS (2010) Efficacy and long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenoma. Gut Liver 4:373–377PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Fanning SB, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Chung A, Kariyawasam VC (2012) Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats. Gastrointest Endosc 75:805–812PubMedCrossRef
19.
Endo M, Abiko Y, Oana S, Kudara N, Chiba T, Suzuki K et al (2010) Usefulness of endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenoma. Dig Endosc 22:360–365PubMedCrossRef
20.
Conio M, De Ceglie A, Filiberti R, Fisher DA, Siersema PD (2012) Cap-assisted EMR of large, sporadic, nonampullary duodenal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 76:1160–1169PubMedCrossRef
21.
Basford PJ, Bhandari P (2012) Endoscopic management of nonampullary duodenal polyps. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 5:127–138CrossRef
22.
Apel D, Jakobs R, Spiethoff A, Riemann JF (2005) Follow-up after endoscopic snare resection of duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 37:444–448PubMedCrossRef
23.
Alexander S, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Bailey A, Co J (2009) EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 69:66–73PubMedCrossRef
24.
Hirasawa R, Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Ishiguro S (1997) Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic resection of duodenal adenocarcinomas and adenomas with the submucosal saline injection technique. Gastrointest Endosc 46:507–513PubMedCrossRef
25.
Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H, Yoshizawa M, Nakano H, Sunada K et al (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 21:270–274PubMedCrossRef
26.
Takahashi T, Ando T, Kabeshima Y, Kawakubo H, Shito M, Sugiura H et al (2009) Borderline cases between benignancy and malignancy of the duodenum diagnosed successfully by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:1377–1383PubMedCrossRef
27.
Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl):S3–S43
28.
Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB, Furth EE, Ginsberg GG (2002) Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 55:390–396
29.
Dekker E, Boparai KS, Poley JW, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Offerhaus GJ, Kuipers EJ et al (2009) High-resolution endoscopy and the additional value of chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of duodenal adenomatosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy 41:666–669PubMedCrossRef
30.
Picasso M, Filiberti R, Blanchi S, Conio M (2007) The role of chromoendoscopy in the surveillance of the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dig Dis Sci 52:1906–1909PubMedCrossRef
31.
Moss A, Bourke MJ, Tran K, Godfrey C, McKay G, Chandra AP et al (2010) Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions. Endoscopy 42:400–404PubMedCrossRef
32.
Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N, Ohtu A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S (2001) New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy 33:221–226PubMedCrossRef
33.
Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D et al (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Baba S et al (2002) A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 55:576–581PubMedCrossRef
35.
Sumiyama K, Kaise M, Nakayoshi T, Kato M, Mashiko T, Uchiyama Y et al (2004) Combined use of a magnifying endoscope with a narrow band imaging system and a multibending endoscope for en bloc EMR of early stage gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 60:79–84PubMedCrossRef
36.
Repici A, Conio M, De Angelis C, Sapino A, Malesci A, Arezzo A et al (2007) Insulated-tip knife endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps unsuitable for standard polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1617–1623PubMedCrossRef
37.
Smith LA, Baraza W, Tiffin N, Cross SS, Hurlstone DP (2008) Endoscopic resection of adenoma-like mass in chronic ulcerative colitis using a combined endoscopic mucosal resection and cap assisted submucosal dissection technique. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14:1380–1386PubMedCrossRef
38.
Otaki Y, Homma K, Nawata Y, Imaizumi K, Arai S (2013) Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision of duodenal carcinoid tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:197–200PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding
Authors
Peter John Basford
Regi George
Emma Nixon
Tehreem Chaudhuri
Rob Mead
Pradeep Bhandari
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3356-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2014 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A new accurate method of physical examination for differentiation of inguinal hernia types

OriginalPaper

Modified laparoscopic intragastric surgery and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumor originating from the muscularis propria

Letter to the Editor

Laparoscopic choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis

Special Article

Laparoscopy Plus Enhanced Recovery: Optimizing the Benefits of MIS Through SAGES ‘SMART’ Program

OriginalPaper

Gastrojejunostomy by pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using a newly designed anastomosing metal stent in a porcine model

Erratum

Erratum to: Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database