Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011

01-01-2011 | New Technology

Durability of the self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES)

Authors: Matthew T. Moyer, Eric M. Pauli, Jegan Gopal, Abraham Mathew, Randy S. Haluck

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) has been shown to provide a safe and reliable means of abdominal access for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). However, the feasibility of using STAT for translumenal organ resection is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the technical performance of organ resection using STAT, the integrity of the STAT gastric tunnel after organ resection, and the postoperative morbidity of organ resection using STAT.

Methods

In this study, 14 domestic swine underwent transgastric organ resection (7 cholecystectomies, 7 uterine horn resections) followed by sequential removal of two different sizes of standardized specimens. Evaluation of operative injury to the tunnel and difficulty of specimen extraction was performed. After 2 weeks of observation, necropsy was performed for evaluation and documentation of gross findings.

Results

The mean operating room time (intubation recovery) was 4.1 h. A tunnel with a mean length of 12 cm and a mean width of 4 cm was created. The tunnel remained fully intact in 14 of 14 animals after organ resection, in 13 of 13 animals after balloon extraction, and in 12 of 14 animals after rigid specimen extraction (1 clinically significant tear occurred). Postoperatively, all the animals gained weight appropriately. Necropsy findings included adhesions (n = 4), bile leak (n = 2), minor lap-port abscess (n = 1), and ventral hernia (n = 1).

Conclusions

Although this study was a limited, prospective, animal survival study without a control arm, it again indicates that STAT allows safe abdominal access, a reliable means of closure, and directed endoscope positioning. Although one significant mucosal tear did occur, this study suggests STAT will tolerate the mechanical forces of peroral transgastric procedures provided the organ resected is small to moderate in size (<8 × 3 cm).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hawes RH, Kalloo A, Rattner D, Brugge W, Gostout C, Kantsevo S, Morhn M, Pasricha J, Ponsky J, Swanstrom L, Rothstein R, Thompson C (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203CrossRef Hawes RH, Kalloo A, Rattner D, Brugge W, Gostout C, Kantsevo S, Morhn M, Pasricha J, Ponsky J, Swanstrom L, Rothstein R, Thompson C (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ponsky JL (2005) Gastroenterologists as surgeons: what they need to know. Gastrointest Endosc 61:454CrossRefPubMed Ponsky JL (2005) Gastroenterologists as surgeons: what they need to know. Gastrointest Endosc 61:454CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reddy DN, Rao GV (2007) Transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity: are we on the right track? Gastrointest Endosc 65:501–502CrossRefPubMed Reddy DN, Rao GV (2007) Transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity: are we on the right track? Gastrointest Endosc 65:501–502CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endolumenal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30CrossRefPubMed Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endolumenal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ryou M, Pai R, Sauer J, Rattner D, Thompson C (2007) Evaluating an optimal gastric closure method for transgastric surgery. Surg Endosc 21:677–680CrossRefPubMed Ryou M, Pai R, Sauer J, Rattner D, Thompson C (2007) Evaluating an optimal gastric closure method for transgastric surgery. Surg Endosc 21:677–680CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697CrossRefPubMed Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434CrossRefPubMed Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McGee MF, Marks JM, Onders RP, Chak A, Rosen MJ, Jin J, Ponsky JL (2008) Infectious implications in the porcine model of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with PEG-tube closure: a quantitative bacteriologic study. Gastrointest Endosc 68:310–314CrossRefPubMed McGee MF, Marks JM, Onders RP, Chak A, Rosen MJ, Jin J, Ponsky JL (2008) Infectious implications in the porcine model of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with PEG-tube closure: a quantitative bacteriologic study. Gastrointest Endosc 68:310–314CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Moyer MT, Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2007) The self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in NOTES: an ex vivo porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:974–978CrossRefPubMed Moyer MT, Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2007) The self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in NOTES: an ex vivo porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:974–978CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pauli EM, Moyer MT, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2008) Self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for NOTES: a porcine survival study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 67:690–697CrossRefPubMed Pauli EM, Moyer MT, Haluck RS, Mathew A (2008) Self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for NOTES: a porcine survival study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 67:690–697CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Ionescu AM, Rogers AM, Shope TR, Moyer MT, Biswas A, Mathew A (2010) Directed submucosal tunneling permits in-line endoscope positioning for transgastric NOTES (with video). Surg Endosc 24(6):1474–1481CrossRefPubMed Pauli EM, Haluck RS, Ionescu AM, Rogers AM, Shope TR, Moyer MT, Biswas A, Mathew A (2010) Directed submucosal tunneling permits in-line endoscope positioning for transgastric NOTES (with video). Surg Endosc 24(6):1474–1481CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference von Delius S, Gillen S, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Fiolka A, Schmid RM, Feussner H, Meining A (2008) Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 68:940–946CrossRef von Delius S, Gillen S, Doundoulakis E, Schneider A, Wilhelm D, Fiolka A, Schmid RM, Feussner H, Meining A (2008) Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 68:940–946CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Deters JL, Knipschield MA, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Pasricha PJ, Chung S, Cotton PB (2006) Pilot study of the porcine uterine horn as an in vivo appendicitis model for development of endoscopic transgastric appendectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 64:808–812CrossRefPubMed Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Deters JL, Knipschield MA, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Pasricha PJ, Chung S, Cotton PB (2006) Pilot study of the porcine uterine horn as an in vivo appendicitis model for development of endoscopic transgastric appendectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 64:808–812CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896CrossRefPubMed Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thoompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478CrossRefPubMed Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thoompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Ravens AF, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606CrossRefPubMed Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Ravens AF, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego JM, Coelho TH, Silva D, Moreira I, Macedo G, Carvalho JL, Pinto JC (2007) Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesicular combined approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 65:111–117CrossRefPubMed Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego JM, Coelho TH, Silva D, Moreira I, Macedo G, Carvalho JL, Pinto JC (2007) Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesicular combined approach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 65:111–117CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shih SP, Kantsevoy SV, Kalloo AN, Magno P, Giday SA, Ko CW, Isakovich NV, Meireles O, Hanly EJ, Marohn MR (2007) Hybrid minimally invasive surgery: a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:1450–1453CrossRefPubMed Shih SP, Kantsevoy SV, Kalloo AN, Magno P, Giday SA, Ko CW, Isakovich NV, Meireles O, Hanly EJ, Marohn MR (2007) Hybrid minimally invasive surgery: a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:1450–1453CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference AVMA Panel on Euthansia (2001) Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthansia. J Am Vet Assn 218:669–701CrossRef AVMA Panel on Euthansia (2001) Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthansia. J Am Vet Assn 218:669–701CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Marler RJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve. Gastrointest Endosc 65:688–694CrossRefPubMed Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Marler RJ (2007) Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve. Gastrointest Endosc 65:688–694CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Chung S, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Pasricha PJ (2007) Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1028–1034CrossRefPubMed Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Chung S, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Pasricha PJ (2007) Transgastric cholecystectomy: transgastric accessibility to the gallbladder improved with the SEMF method and a novel multibending therapeutic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1028–1034CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Durability of the self-approximating translumenal access technique (STAT) for potential use in natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES)
Authors
Matthew T. Moyer
Eric M. Pauli
Jegan Gopal
Abraham Mathew
Randy S. Haluck
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1141-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011 Go to the issue