Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011

01-01-2011

Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery using antitraction sutures

Authors: Ralph P. M. Gadiot, Michalda S. Dunker, Amir Mearadji, Guido H. H. Mannaerts

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakage is a major complication in colorectal surgery. This study investigates a new method for reducing anastomotic failure using antitraction sutures.

Methods

In 2007, the authors began routine placement of three sutures at every one-third of the circular end-to-end anastomosis to reduce traction. Before the start of the new protocol, 76 patients received laparoscopic colorectal left sided surgery, 21 (28%) of whom received a defunctioning stoma. After the start of the new protocol, 77 patients received laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 6 (8%) of whom received a defunctioning stoma.

Results

Placement of a defunctioning stoma was significantly reduced (n = 21 vs. 6; P = 0.01). Only one patient (1%) in the sutured group experienced anastomotic leakage compared with six patients in the control group (P = 0.025). Other anastomosis-related complications during the follow-up period, including anastomotic stenosis and intraabdominal abscess, occurred more frequently in the control group, although the difference did not reach significance.

Conclusion

The use of antitraction sutures to support the anastomosis seems to reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic left colorectal surgery. A prospective randomized trial is necessary to prove the decreasing effect of antitraction sutures on anastomotic leakage as well as the major decreasing effect on the necessity of placement of defunctioning stomas.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Gregoire R, Burpee SE, Poulin EC (2003) Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures. Can J Surg 46:432–440PubMed Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Gregoire R, Burpee SE, Poulin EC (2003) Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures. Can J Surg 46:432–440PubMed
2.
go back to reference Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Col Surg 185:105–113 Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Col Surg 185:105–113
3.
go back to reference Rose J, Schneider C, Yildirim C, Geers P, Scheidbach H, Köckerling F (2004) Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicentre trial. Tech Coloproctol 8:S25–S28CrossRefPubMed Rose J, Schneider C, Yildirim C, Geers P, Scheidbach H, Köckerling F (2004) Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicentre trial. Tech Coloproctol 8:S25–S28CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorect Dis 6:462–469CrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorect Dis 6:462–469CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goriainov V, Miles AJ (2008) Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intracorporeal stapled anastomosis. J Minim Access Surg 4:39–43CrossRefPubMed Goriainov V, Miles AJ (2008) Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intracorporeal stapled anastomosis. J Minim Access Surg 4:39–43CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154CrossRefPubMed McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF (2009) Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF (2009) Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1317–1320CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Van Deurzen DF, Mannaerts GH, Lange JF (2006) Technique for instant stapling of the sigmoid mesentery and mesorectum in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 20:1778–1779CrossRefPubMed Van Deurzen DF, Mannaerts GH, Lange JF (2006) Technique for instant stapling of the sigmoid mesentery and mesorectum in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 20:1778–1779CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Aalbers AG, Mannaerts GH (2006) Introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, 2002/2005. Neth J Med 150:1455–1461 Aalbers AG, Mannaerts GH (2006) Introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, 2002/2005. Neth J Med 150:1455–1461
13.
go back to reference Korolija D (2008) The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in the digestive tract. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:151–154CrossRefPubMed Korolija D (2008) The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in the digestive tract. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:151–154CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery using antitraction sutures
Authors
Ralph P. M. Gadiot
Michalda S. Dunker
Amir Mearadji
Guido H. H. Mannaerts
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1131-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2011 Go to the issue