Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010

Open Access 01-04-2010

Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe

Authors: Aurora D. Pryor, John R. Tushar, Louis R. DiBernardo

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Single-port or single-incision cholecystectomy with current rigid laparoscopic devices is limited by in-line visualization, restricting the ability to approach the surgical site with proper angles and instrumentation. A single-port access system with articulating arms and strong instrumentation should minimize these issues. The TransEnterix system may facilitate safe and straightforward single-port surgery.

Methods

The TransEnterix single-port surgery system was used in both survival and nonsurvival porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomies under animal use committee approval. Nonsurvival procedures compared four standard laparoscopic with four single-port cholecystectomies from a histologic perspective. Five single-port swine laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures were completed in sterile conditions, and all animals survived for 1 week postoperatively. Standard surgical clips were used for both cystic duct and artery ligation. At sacrifice, both gross and microscopic histology were obtained for assessment of surgical complications.

Results

All cholecystectomies were successfully completed with the TransEnterix single-port system. Operative time for the survival procedures averaged 39.4 (range 18–66) min. Histology of the acute specimens showed less inflammation at the single-port site compared with the trocar sites from the standard cholecystectomy. At sacrifice, no complications were identified.

Conclusions

The TransEnterix system is safe and straightforward for completing single-port cholecystectomy in this limited porcine series. Port site inflammation is reduced compared with standard laparoscopic trocars.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M et al (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54(5):1020–1029CrossRefPubMed Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M et al (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54(5):1020–1029CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 18(11):1492–1494CrossRefPubMed Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 18(11):1492–1494CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Romanelli JR, Mark L, Omotosho PA (2008) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report. Surg Innov 15(3):223–228CrossRefPubMed Romanelli JR, Mark L, Omotosho PA (2008) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report. Surg Innov 15(3):223–228CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23(4):896–899CrossRefPubMed Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23(4):896–899CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA et al (2008) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol 5(10):561–568CrossRefPubMed Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA et al (2008) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol 5(10):561–568CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gumbs AA, Milone L, Sinha P et al (2009) Totally transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):533–534CrossRefPubMed Gumbs AA, Milone L, Sinha P et al (2009) Totally transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):533–534CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T et al (2008) Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur Urol 53(6):1117–1120CrossRefPubMed Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T et al (2008) Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur Urol 53(6):1117–1120CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference de la Fuente SG, Demaria EJ, Reynolds JD et al (2007) New developments in surgery: Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Arch Surg 142(3):295–297CrossRefPubMed de la Fuente SG, Demaria EJ, Reynolds JD et al (2007) New developments in surgery: Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Arch Surg 142(3):295–297CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333CrossRefPubMed Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 20(2):329–333CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe
Authors
Aurora D. Pryor
John R. Tushar
Louis R. DiBernardo
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0695-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010 Go to the issue