Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2008

01-11-2008

Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: M. J. van Det, W. J. H. J. Meijerink, C. Hoff, M. A. van Veelen, J. P. E. N. Pierie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the expanding implementation of minimally invasive surgery, the operating team is confronted with challenges in the field of ergonomics. Visual feedback is derived from a monitor placed outside the operating field. This crossover trial was conducted to evaluate and compare neck posture in relation to monitor position in a dedicated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suite and a conventional operating room.

Methods

Assessment of the neck was conducted for 16 surgeons, assisting surgeons, and scrub nurses performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in both types of operating room. Flexion and rotation of the cervical spine were measured intraoperatively using a video analysis system. A two-question visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire was used to evaluate posture in relation to the monitor position.

Results

Neck rotation was significantly reduced in the MIS suite for the surgeon (p = 0.018) and the assisting surgeon (p < 0.001). Neck flexion was significantly improved in the MIS suite for the surgeon (p < 0.001) and the scrub nurse (p = 0.018). On the questionnaire, the operating room team scored their posture significantly higher in the MIS suite and also indicated fewer musculoskeletal complaints.

Conclusions

The ergonomic quality of the neck posture is significantly improved in the MIS suite for the entire operating room team.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia, and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia, and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399PubMedCrossRef Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCrossRef Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schellekens PC, Bijnen AB, Honing M, Lourens J, de Ruiter P (1995) Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139:723–727PubMed Schellekens PC, Bijnen AB, Honing M, Lourens J, de Ruiter P (1995) Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139:723–727PubMed
6.
go back to reference Van Veelen MA, Nederlof EA, Goossens RH, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef Van Veelen MA, Nederlof EA, Goossens RH, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kenyon TA, Urbach DR, Speer JB, Waterman-Hukari B, Foraker GF, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 15:1140–1143PubMedCrossRef Kenyon TA, Urbach DR, Speer JB, Waterman-Hukari B, Foraker GF, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 15:1140–1143PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Erfanian K, Luks FI, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr (2003) In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 38:1059–1062PubMedCrossRef Erfanian K, Luks FI, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr (2003) In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 38:1059–1062PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 15:499–503PubMedCrossRef Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 15:499–503PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, Fritzsche F, Seitz T, Bubb H, Horvath OP (2004) Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1118–1122PubMedCrossRef Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, Fritzsche F, Seitz T, Bubb H, Horvath OP (2004) Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1118–1122PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Herron DM, Gagner M, Kenyon TL, Swanstrom LL (2001) The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century: a discussion of critical design elements. Surg Endosc 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef Herron DM, Gagner M, Kenyon TL, Swanstrom LL (2001) The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century: a discussion of critical design elements. Surg Endosc 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481–484PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481–484PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Seghers J, Jochem A, Spaepen A (2003) Posture, muscle activity, and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings. Ergonomics 46:714–730PubMedCrossRef Seghers J, Jochem A, Spaepen A (2003) Posture, muscle activity, and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings. Ergonomics 46:714–730PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Middel B, Van Sonderen FLP (2002) Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integrated Care 2:1–21 Middel B, Van Sonderen FLP (2002) Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integrated Care 2:1–21
18.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
19.
go back to reference Middel B, Stewart R, Bouma J, van Sonderen E, van den Heuvel WJA (2001) How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status: is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating? J Eval Clin Pract 7:399–410PubMedCrossRef Middel B, Stewart R, Bouma J, van Sonderen E, van den Heuvel WJA (2001) How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status: is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating? J Eval Clin Pract 7:399–410PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Psihogios JP, Sommerich CM, Mirka GA, Moon SD (2001) A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. Appl Ergon 32:313–325PubMedCrossRef Psihogios JP, Sommerich CM, Mirka GA, Moon SD (2001) A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. Appl Ergon 32:313–325PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:436–440PubMedCrossRef Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:436–440PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Omar AM, Wade NJ, Brown SI, Cuschieri A (2005) Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19:105–108PubMedCrossRef Omar AM, Wade NJ, Brown SI, Cuschieri A (2005) Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19:105–108PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
M. J. van Det
W. J. H. J. Meijerink
C. Hoff
M. A. van Veelen
J. P. E. N. Pierie
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0042-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2008 Go to the issue