Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2007

01-03-2007

A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection

Authors: S. E. Noblett, A. F. Horgan

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and costs associated with laparoscopic resection within an elective colorectal practice.

Method

Over a 12-month period data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing elective colorectal resection under the care of a single consultant surgeon. Thirty patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were case-matched by type of resection, disease process, and, where appropriate, cancer stage to patients having open surgery. A cost analysis was carried out incorporating cost of surgical bed stay, theater time, and specific equipment costs.

Results

In the 30 patients having laparoscopic resection, a conversion rate of 13% was observed. Surgery was performed for colorectal cancer in 83% of patients, and 53% of resections were rectal. No significant differences were found in age (65 versus 69 years, p = 0.415), BMI (27.4 versus 26.1, p = 0.527), POSSUM physiology score (16 versus 16.5, p = 0.102), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (2 versus 2, p = 0.171), or length of theater time (160 min versus 160 min, p = 0.233) between the laparoscopic and open patients. Hospital stay was reduced in the laparoscopic group (5 versus 9 days, p < 0.001). Average cost of surgical equipment used for a laparoscopic resection was greater than for open surgery (£912.39 versus £276.41, p = 0.001). Cost of hospital stay was significantly less (£1259.75 versus £2267.55, p < 0.001). Cost of operating room time was similar for the two groups (£2066.63 versus £1945.07, p = 0.152). Overall no significant cost difference could be found between open and laparoscopic resection (£4560.9 versus £4348.45, p = 0.976). More postoperative complications were seen in the open resection group (14 versus 4, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative equipment costs are greater for laparoscopic resection than for open surgery. However, benefits can be seen in terms of quicker recovery and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery is a financially viable alternative to open resection in selected patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alexander J, Jacques JB, Mitchell K (1993) Laparoscopic assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 341: 249–250PubMedCrossRef Alexander J, Jacques JB, Mitchell K (1993) Laparoscopic assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 341: 249–250PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic asssisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef COST Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic asssisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef
3.
go back to reference COST Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef COST Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238: 67–72PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238: 67–72PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
8.
go back to reference Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookion C, Tsushima G, Phillips EH (1998) Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 832–838PubMedCrossRef Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookion C, Tsushima G, Phillips EH (1998) Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 832–838PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139: 39–42PubMedCrossRef Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139: 39–42PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363: 1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, D’Ambrosio G (2002) Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16: 596–602PubMedCrossRef Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, D’Ambrosio G (2002) Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16: 596–602PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10: 15–18CrossRef Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10: 15–18CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Musser DJ, Boorse RC, Madera F, Reed JF 3rd (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost? Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 1–5PubMed Musser DJ, Boorse RC, Madera F, Reed JF 3rd (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost? Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 1–5PubMed
15.
go back to reference Nduka C, Monson J, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A (1994) Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 81: 648–652PubMed Nduka C, Monson J, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A (1994) Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 81: 648–652PubMed
16.
go back to reference Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bagge E (1997) Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg 21: 214–217PubMedCrossRef Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bagge E (1997) Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg 21: 214–217PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Psaila J, Bulley SH, Ewings P, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (1998) Outcome following laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 85: 662–664PubMedCrossRef Psaila J, Bulley SH, Ewings P, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (1998) Outcome following laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 85: 662–664PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vardulaki KA, Bennett-Lloyd BD, Parfitt J, Normand C, Paisley S, Darzi A, Reeves B (2000) A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: London Vardulaki KA, Bennett-Lloyd BD, Parfitt J, Normand C, Paisley S, Darzi A, Reeves B (2000) A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: London
19.
go back to reference Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela RL (2001) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 15: 450–454PubMedCrossRef Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela RL (2001) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 15: 450–454PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection
Authors
S. E. Noblett
A. F. Horgan
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9016-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2007 Go to the issue