Published in:
01-05-2012 | Original Paper
Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors:
Wei-Xiang Qi, Li-Na Tang, Ai-Na He, Zan Shen, Yang Yao
Published in:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
|
Issue 5/2012
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
To compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Methods
We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed in patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Results
Five randomized clinical trials (totally 1,186 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.95, P = 0.007) and overall response rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58–3.62, P = 0.000) in pemetrexed-based doublet group, compared with pemetrexed alone, though the pooled HR for overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76–1.04; P = 0.129) showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there were more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–3.77, P = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.57–16.0, P = 0.000), and leucopenia (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.13–5.34, P = 0.024) in pemetrexed-based doublet group. With regard to the risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17–2.91, P = 0.629) and fatigue (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92–2.35, P = 0.104), there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusion
Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy didn’t gain any benefit in survival but significantly improved PFS and better ORR compared with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia were observed in pemetrexed-based doublet group.