Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Paper

Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Wei-Xiang Qi, Li-Na Tang, Ai-Na He, Zan Shen, Yang Yao

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Methods

We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared pemetrexed-based doublet with single-agent pemetrexed in patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data were extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Five randomized clinical trials (totally 1,186 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.95, P = 0.007) and overall response rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.58–3.62, P = 0.000) in pemetrexed-based doublet group, compared with pemetrexed alone, though the pooled HR for overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76–1.04; P = 0.129) showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there were more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–3.77, P = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.57–16.0, P = 0.000), and leucopenia (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.13–5.34, P = 0.024) in pemetrexed-based doublet group. With regard to the risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17–2.91, P = 0.629) and fatigue (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92–2.35, P = 0.104), there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

Pemetrexed-based doublet therapy didn’t gain any benefit in survival but significantly improved PFS and better ORR compared with single-agent pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia were observed in pemetrexed-based doublet group.
Literature
go back to reference Arrieta O, Villarreal-Garza C, Pachuca D et al (2011) High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy. Med Oncol 8:300–306CrossRef Arrieta O, Villarreal-Garza C, Pachuca D et al (2011) High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy. Med Oncol 8:300–306CrossRef
go back to reference Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chiappori A, Bepler G, Barlesi F et al (2010) Phase II, double-blinded, randomized study of enzastaurin plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5:369–375PubMedCrossRef Chiappori A, Bepler G, Barlesi F et al (2010) Phase II, double-blinded, randomized study of enzastaurin plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5:369–375PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH et al (2011) Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1067–1074PubMedCrossRef de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH et al (2011) Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1067–1074PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Di Maio M, Chiodini P, Georgoulias V et al (2009) Meta-analysis of single-agent chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:1836–1843PubMedCrossRef Di Maio M, Chiodini P, Georgoulias V et al (2009) Meta-analysis of single-agent chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:1836–1843PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Favaretto A, Pasello G, Magro C et al (2009) Second and third line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 71:117–126PubMedCrossRef Favaretto A, Pasello G, Magro C et al (2009) Second and third line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 71:117–126PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Felip E, Rosell R, Pampaloni G (2008) Pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ther Clin Risk Manag 4:579–585PubMed Felip E, Rosell R, Pampaloni G (2008) Pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ther Clin Risk Manag 4:579–585PubMed
go back to reference Hanauske AR, Eismann U, Oberschmidt O et al (2007) In vitro chemosensitivity of freshly explanted tumor cells to pemetrexed is correlated with target gene expression. Invest New Drugs 25:417–423PubMedCrossRef Hanauske AR, Eismann U, Oberschmidt O et al (2007) In vitro chemosensitivity of freshly explanted tumor cells to pemetrexed is correlated with target gene expression. Invest New Drugs 25:417–423PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597PubMedCrossRef Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ho C, Davies AM, Lara PN Jr et al (2006) Second-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: current and future options. Clinic Lung Cancer 7:S118–S125CrossRef Ho C, Davies AM, Lara PN Jr et al (2006) Second-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: current and future options. Clinic Lung Cancer 7:S118–S125CrossRef
go back to reference Marinis F, Grossib F (2008) Clinical evidence for second- and third-line treatment options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 13:14–20PubMedCrossRef Marinis F, Grossib F (2008) Clinical evidence for second- and third-line treatment options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 13:14–20PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613PubMedCrossRef Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834PubMedCrossRef Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Qi WX, Shen Z, Yao Y (2011) Meta-analysis of docetaxel-based doublet versus docetaxel alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. doi:10.1007/s00280-011-1678-9 PubMed Qi WX, Shen Z, Yao Y (2011) Meta-analysis of docetaxel-based doublet versus docetaxel alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-011-1678-9 PubMed
go back to reference Russo FBA, Pampaloni G (2008) Pemetrexed single agent chemotherapy in previously treated patients with local advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 8:216–223PubMedCrossRef Russo FBA, Pampaloni G (2008) Pemetrexed single agent chemotherapy in previously treated patients with local advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 8:216–223PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3543–3551PubMedCrossRef Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3543–3551PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scagliotti G, Hanna N, Fossella F et al (2009) The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two phase III studies. Oncologist 14:253–263PubMedCrossRef Scagliotti G, Hanna N, Fossella F et al (2009) The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two phase III studies. Oncologist 14:253–263PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scagliotti GV, Germonpré P, Bosquée L et al (2010) A randomized phase II study of bortezomib and pemetrexed, in combination or alone, in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 68:420–426PubMedCrossRef Scagliotti GV, Germonpré P, Bosquée L et al (2010) A randomized phase II study of bortezomib and pemetrexed, in combination or alone, in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 68:420–426PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP et al (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98PubMedCrossRef Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP et al (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schiller JH, von Pawel J, Schütt P et al (2010) Pemetrexed with or without matuzumab as second-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5:1977–1985PubMedCrossRef Schiller JH, von Pawel J, Schütt P et al (2010) Pemetrexed with or without matuzumab as second-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5:1977–1985PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T (2005) National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132PubMedCrossRef Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T (2005) National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smit EF, Burgers SA, Biesma B et al (2009) Randomized phase II and pharmacogenetic study of pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2038–2045PubMedCrossRef Smit EF, Burgers SA, Biesma B et al (2009) Randomized phase II and pharmacogenetic study of pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2038–2045PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yusuf S, Peto R, Jones DR, Collins R et al (1985) Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335–371PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Peto R, Jones DR, Collins R et al (1985) Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335–371PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zintzaras E, Ioannidis JP (2005) Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches. Genet Epidemiol 28:123–137PubMedCrossRef Zintzaras E, Ioannidis JP (2005) Heterogeneity testing in meta-analysis of genome searches. Genet Epidemiol 28:123–137PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet versus pemetrexed alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Wei-Xiang Qi
Li-Na Tang
Ai-Na He
Zan Shen
Yang Yao
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1155-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.