Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Review and Perspectives

Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy

Authors: Rupert Langer, Karen Becker

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy has been successfully introduced in the treatment of locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly esophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers. The effects of preoperative chemo- or radiochemotherapy can be determined by histopathological investigation of the resection specimen following this treatment. Frequent histological findings after neoadjuvant therapy include various amounts of residual tumor, inflammation, resorptive changes with infiltrates of foamy histiocytes, foreign body reactions, and scarry fibrosis. Several tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, which aim to categorize the amount of regressive changes after cytotoxic treatment in primary tumor sites, have been proposed for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas. These systems primarily refer to the amount of therapy-induced fibrosis in relation to the residual tumor (e.g., the Mandard, Dworak, or AJCC systems) or the estimated percentage of residual tumor in relation to the previous tumor site (e.g., the Becker, Rödel, or Rectal Cancer Regression Grading systems). TRGs provide valuable prognostic information, as in most cases, complete or subtotal tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment is associated with better patient outcomes. This review describes the typical histopathological findings after neoadjuvant treatment, discusses the most commonly used TRG systems for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas, addresses the limitations and critical issues of tumor regression grading in these tumors, and describes the clinical impact of TRG.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon J-P et al (2011) Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29(13):1715–1721CrossRefPubMed Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon J-P et al (2011) Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29(13):1715–1721CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:679–687CrossRefPubMed Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:679–687CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ et al (2009) Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 27:5124–5130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ et al (2009) Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 27:5124–5130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA et al (2005) Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer 103:1347–1355CrossRefPubMed Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA et al (2005) Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer 103:1347–1355CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844CrossRefPubMed Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:918–928CrossRefPubMed Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:918–928CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760CrossRefPubMed Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Damjanov I, O’Neil M (2009) Histopathology of Colorectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy. Open Pathol J 3:91–98CrossRef Damjanov I, O’Neil M (2009) Histopathology of Colorectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy. Open Pathol J 3:91–98CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Langer R, Ott K, Feith M et al (2009) Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22:1555–1563CrossRefPubMed Langer R, Ott K, Feith M et al (2009) Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 22:1555–1563CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C et al (2003) Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98:1521–1530CrossRefPubMed Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C et al (2003) Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98:1521–1530CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chang F, Deere H, Mahadeva U, George S (2008) Histopathologic examination and reporting of esophageal carcinomas following preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: practical guidelines and current issues. Am J Clin Pathol 129:252–262CrossRefPubMed Chang F, Deere H, Mahadeva U, George S (2008) Histopathologic examination and reporting of esophageal carcinomas following preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: practical guidelines and current issues. Am J Clin Pathol 129:252–262CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12:19–23CrossRef Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12:19–23CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRefPubMed Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R et al (2005) Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification. Ann Surg 242:684–692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R et al (2005) Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification. Ann Surg 242:684–692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696CrossRefPubMed Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Wu TT et al (2005) Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Ann Surg 241:810–817 discussion 817-820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Wu TT et al (2005) Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Ann Surg 241:810–817 discussion 817-820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Venkatraman E, Bains MS et al (2007) American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:507–512CrossRefPubMed Rizk NP, Venkatraman E, Bains MS et al (2007) American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:507–512CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hav M, Libbrecht L, Geboes K et al (2015) Prognostic value of tumor shrinkage versus fragmentation following radiochemotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer. Virchows Arch 466:517–523CrossRefPubMed Hav M, Libbrecht L, Geboes K et al (2015) Prognostic value of tumor shrinkage versus fragmentation following radiochemotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer. Virchows Arch 466:517–523CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Shia J, Guillem JG, Moore HG et al (2004) Patterns of morphologic alteration in residual rectal carcinoma following preoperative chemoradiation and their association with long-term outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 28:215–223CrossRefPubMed Shia J, Guillem JG, Moore HG et al (2004) Patterns of morphologic alteration in residual rectal carcinoma following preoperative chemoradiation and their association with long-term outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 28:215–223CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sannier A, Lefèvre JH, Panis Y et al (2014) Pathological prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: analysis of 113 cases. Histopathology 65:623–630CrossRefPubMed Sannier A, Lefèvre JH, Panis Y et al (2014) Pathological prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: analysis of 113 cases. Histopathology 65:623–630CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hornick JL, Farraye FA, Odze RD (2006) Prevalence and significance of prominent mucin pools in the esophagus post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 30:28–35CrossRefPubMed Hornick JL, Farraye FA, Odze RD (2006) Prevalence and significance of prominent mucin pools in the esophagus post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 30:28–35CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Shia J, McManus M, Guillem JG et al (2011) Significance of acellular mucin pools in rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Am J Surg Pathol 35:127–134CrossRefPubMed Shia J, McManus M, Guillem JG et al (2011) Significance of acellular mucin pools in rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Am J Surg Pathol 35:127–134CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F et al (2017) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer International Publishing, ChamCrossRef Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F et al (2017) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer International Publishing, ChamCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Japan Esophageal Society (2017) Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus 14:1–36CrossRef Japan Esophageal Society (2017) Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus 14:1–36CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bateman AC, Jaynes E, Bateman AR (2009) Rectal cancer staging post neoadjuvant therapy—how should the changes be assessed? Histopathology 54:713–721CrossRefPubMed Bateman AC, Jaynes E, Bateman AR (2009) Rectal cancer staging post neoadjuvant therapy—how should the changes be assessed? Histopathology 54:713–721CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mace AG, Pai RK, Stocchi L, Kalady MF (2015) American Joint Committee on Cancer and College of American Pathologists regression grade: a new prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58:32–44CrossRefPubMed Mace AG, Pai RK, Stocchi L, Kalady MF (2015) American Joint Committee on Cancer and College of American Pathologists regression grade: a new prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58:32–44CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jäger T, Neureiter D, Urbas R et al (2017) Applicability of American Joint Committee on Cancer and College of American Pathologists Regression Grading System in Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 60:815–826CrossRefPubMed Jäger T, Neureiter D, Urbas R et al (2017) Applicability of American Joint Committee on Cancer and College of American Pathologists Regression Grading System in Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 60:815–826CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Brucher BL, Becker K, Lordick F et al (2006) The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 106:2119–2127CrossRefPubMed Brucher BL, Becker K, Lordick F et al (2006) The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 106:2119–2127CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Rosenberg R, Nekarda H, Zimmermann F et al (2008) Histopathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival. J Surg Oncol 97:8–13CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg R, Nekarda H, Zimmermann F et al (2008) Histopathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival. J Surg Oncol 97:8–13CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Becker K, Langer R, Reim D et al (2011) Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg 253:934–939CrossRefPubMed Becker K, Langer R, Reim D et al (2011) Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg 253:934–939CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Kuwata T, Shimoda T et al (2015) Determination of the optimal cutoff percentage of residual tumors to define the pathological response rate for gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy (JCOG1004-a). Gastric Cancer 18:597–604CrossRefPubMed Nakamura K, Kuwata T, Shimoda T et al (2015) Determination of the optimal cutoff percentage of residual tumors to define the pathological response rate for gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy (JCOG1004-a). Gastric Cancer 18:597–604CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Sano T, Aiko T (2011) New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 14:97–100CrossRefPubMed Sano T, Aiko T (2011) New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 14:97–100CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Fokas E, Liersch T, Fietkau R et al (2014) Tumor regression grading after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma revisited: updated results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:1554–1562CrossRefPubMed Fokas E, Liersch T, Fietkau R et al (2014) Tumor regression grading after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma revisited: updated results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:1554–1562CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Chetty R, Gill P, Govender D et al (2012) International study group on rectal cancer regression grading: interobserver variability with commonly used regression grading systems. Hum Pathol 43:1917–1923CrossRefPubMed Chetty R, Gill P, Govender D et al (2012) International study group on rectal cancer regression grading: interobserver variability with commonly used regression grading systems. Hum Pathol 43:1917–1923CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Chetty R, Gill P, Govender D et al (2012) A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Virchows Arch 460:151–155CrossRefPubMed Chetty R, Gill P, Govender D et al (2012) A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Virchows Arch 460:151–155CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Wu TT, Chirieac LR, Abraham SC et al (2007) Excellent interobserver agreement on grading the extent of residual carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal and esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a reliable predictor for patient outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 31:58–64CrossRefPubMed Wu TT, Chirieac LR, Abraham SC et al (2007) Excellent interobserver agreement on grading the extent of residual carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal and esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a reliable predictor for patient outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 31:58–64CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Trakarnsanga A, Gonen M, Shia J et al (2014) Comparison of tumor regression grade systems for locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodality treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju248 Trakarnsanga A, Gonen M, Shia J et al (2014) Comparison of tumor regression grade systems for locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodality treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju248
41.
go back to reference Donohoe CL, O’Farrell NJ, Grant T et al (2013) Classification of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal and junctional cancer: assessment of existing measures and proposal of a novel 3-point standard. Ann Surg 258:784–792 discussion 792CrossRefPubMed Donohoe CL, O’Farrell NJ, Grant T et al (2013) Classification of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal and junctional cancer: assessment of existing measures and proposal of a novel 3-point standard. Ann Surg 258:784–792 discussion 792CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Fareed KR, Ilyas M, Kaye PV et al (2009) Tumour regression grade (TRG) analyses in patients with resectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 55:399–406CrossRefPubMed Fareed KR, Ilyas M, Kaye PV et al (2009) Tumour regression grade (TRG) analyses in patients with resectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Histopathology 55:399–406CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Mirza A, Naveed A, Hayes S et al (2012) Assessment of histopathological response in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: which scoring system to use? ISRN Pathol 2012:8CrossRef Mirza A, Naveed A, Hayes S et al (2012) Assessment of histopathological response in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: which scoring system to use? ISRN Pathol 2012:8CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Karamitopoulou E, Thies S, Zlobec I et al (2014) Assessment of tumor regression of esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of 2 commonly used scoring approaches. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1551–1556CrossRefPubMed Karamitopoulou E, Thies S, Zlobec I et al (2014) Assessment of tumor regression of esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of 2 commonly used scoring approaches. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1551–1556CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Glynne-Jones R et al (2016) Second St. Gallen European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 63:11–24CrossRefPubMed Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Glynne-Jones R et al (2016) Second St. Gallen European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 63:11–24CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Tulchinsky H, Shmueli E, Figer A et al (2008) An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease–free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2661–2667CrossRefPubMed Tulchinsky H, Shmueli E, Figer A et al (2008) An interval >7 weeks between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery improves pathologic complete response and disease–free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2661–2667CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Zhou Z-R, Liu S-X, Zhang T-S et al (2014) Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery versus long-course chemoradiation with delayed surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 23:211–221CrossRefPubMed Zhou Z-R, Liu S-X, Zhang T-S et al (2014) Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery versus long-course chemoradiation with delayed surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 23:211–221CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Calvo FA, Morillo V, Santos M et al (2014) Interval between neoadjuvant treatment and definitive surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: impact on response and oncologic outcomes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 140:1651–1660CrossRefPubMed Calvo FA, Morillo V, Santos M et al (2014) Interval between neoadjuvant treatment and definitive surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: impact on response and oncologic outcomes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 140:1651–1660CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Rombouts AJM, Hugen N, Elferink MAG et al (2016) Treatment interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer patients: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3593–3601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rombouts AJM, Hugen N, Elferink MAG et al (2016) Treatment interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer patients: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3593–3601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Blank S, Lordick F, Bader F et al (2015) Post-therapeutic response evaluation by a combination of endoscopy and CT scan in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy: better than its reputation. Gastric Cancer 18:314–325CrossRefPubMed Blank S, Lordick F, Bader F et al (2015) Post-therapeutic response evaluation by a combination of endoscopy and CT scan in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy: better than its reputation. Gastric Cancer 18:314–325CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Schollaert P, Crott R, Bertrand C et al (2014) A systematic review of the predictive value of 18FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification. J Gastrointest Surg 18:894–905CrossRefPubMed Schollaert P, Crott R, Bertrand C et al (2014) A systematic review of the predictive value of 18FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification. J Gastrointest Surg 18:894–905CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Schmidt T, Lordick F, Herrmann K, Ott K (2015) Value of functional imaging by PET in esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:239–247CrossRef Schmidt T, Lordick F, Herrmann K, Ott K (2015) Value of functional imaging by PET in esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:239–247CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Granja M, Sastre J et al (2016) Prognostic significance of tumor regression in lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch 468:425–430CrossRefPubMed Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Granja M, Sastre J et al (2016) Prognostic significance of tumor regression in lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch 468:425–430CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Becker K, Reim D, Novotny A et al (2012) Proposal for a multifactorial prognostic score that accurately classifies 3 groups of gastric carcinoma patients with different outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Ann Surg 256:1002–1007CrossRefPubMed Becker K, Reim D, Novotny A et al (2012) Proposal for a multifactorial prognostic score that accurately classifies 3 groups of gastric carcinoma patients with different outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Ann Surg 256:1002–1007CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Langer R, Becker K, Zlobec I et al (2014) A multifactorial histopathologic score for the prediction of prognosis of resected esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:915–921CrossRefPubMed Langer R, Becker K, Zlobec I et al (2014) A multifactorial histopathologic score for the prediction of prognosis of resected esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:915–921CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Philippron A, Bollschweiler E, Kunikata A et al (2016) Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28:549–558CrossRefPubMed Philippron A, Bollschweiler E, Kunikata A et al (2016) Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28:549–558CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Kim SH, Chang HJ, Kim DY et al (2016) What is the ideal tumor regression grading system in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy? Cancer Res Treat 48:998–1009CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Chang HJ, Kim DY et al (2016) What is the ideal tumor regression grading system in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy? Cancer Res Treat 48:998–1009CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Francis AM, Sepesi B, Correa AM et al (2013) The influence of histopathologic tumor viability on long-term survival and recurrence rates following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 258:500–507CrossRefPubMed Francis AM, Sepesi B, Correa AM et al (2013) The influence of histopathologic tumor viability on long-term survival and recurrence rates following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 258:500–507CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Schmidt T, Sicic L, Blank S et al (2014) Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 110:1712–1720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmidt T, Sicic L, Blank S et al (2014) Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 110:1712–1720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Stenning SP, Smyth EC et al (2017) Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2–3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:357–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cunningham D, Stenning SP, Smyth EC et al (2017) Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2–3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:357–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
go back to reference Tomasello G, Petrelli F, Ghidini M et al (2017) Tumor regression grade and survival after neoadjuvant treatment in gastro-esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of 17 published studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(9):1607–1616CrossRefPubMed Tomasello G, Petrelli F, Ghidini M et al (2017) Tumor regression grade and survival after neoadjuvant treatment in gastro-esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of 17 published studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(9):1607–1616CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Reim D, Gertler R, Novotny A et al (2012) Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction are more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than distal gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2108–2118CrossRefPubMed Reim D, Gertler R, Novotny A et al (2012) Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction are more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than distal gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2108–2118CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Quah HM, Chou JF, Gonen M et al (2008) Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer 113:57–64CrossRefPubMed Quah HM, Chou JF, Gonen M et al (2008) Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer 113:57–64CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Huebner M, Wolff BG, Smyrk TC et al (2012) Partial pathologic response and nodal status as most significant prognostic factors for advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg 36:675–683CrossRefPubMed Huebner M, Wolff BG, Smyrk TC et al (2012) Partial pathologic response and nodal status as most significant prognostic factors for advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. World J Surg 36:675–683CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Kim JY, Park IJ, Hong SM et al (2015) Is pathologic near-total regression an appropriate indicator of a good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on oncologic outcome of disease? Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2257CrossRef Kim JY, Park IJ, Hong SM et al (2015) Is pathologic near-total regression an appropriate indicator of a good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on oncologic outcome of disease? Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2257CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Swellengrebel HA, Bosch SL, Cats A et al (2014) Tumour regression grading after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a near pathologic complete response does not translate into good clinical outcome. Radiother Oncol 112:44–51CrossRefPubMed Swellengrebel HA, Bosch SL, Cats A et al (2014) Tumour regression grading after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a near pathologic complete response does not translate into good clinical outcome. Radiother Oncol 112:44–51CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Lim SB, Yu CS, Hong YS et al (2012) Long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation followed by curative surgical resection. J Surg Oncol 106:659–666CrossRefPubMed Lim SB, Yu CS, Hong YS et al (2012) Long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation followed by curative surgical resection. J Surg Oncol 106:659–666CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Lee YC, Hsieh CC, Chuang JP (2013) Prognostic significance of partial tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1093–1101CrossRefPubMed Lee YC, Hsieh CC, Chuang JP (2013) Prognostic significance of partial tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1093–1101CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference MacGregor TP, Maughan TS, Sharma RA (2012) Pathological grading of regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the clinical need is now. J Clin Pathol 65:867–871CrossRefPubMed MacGregor TP, Maughan TS, Sharma RA (2012) Pathological grading of regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the clinical need is now. J Clin Pathol 65:867–871CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) The TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) The TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
72.
go back to reference Minsky BD, Rodel C (2014) Identifying the Most Predictive Post-Chemoradiation TRG System for Rectal Cancer. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju285–dju285CrossRefPubMed Minsky BD, Rodel C (2014) Identifying the Most Predictive Post-Chemoradiation TRG System for Rectal Cancer. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju285–dju285CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Pearce T, Buyse M (2006) Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer—are we getting closer? Ann Oncol 17:1239–1248CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Pearce T, Buyse M (2006) Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer—are we getting closer? Ann Oncol 17:1239–1248CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Moehler M, Delic M, Goepfert K et al (2016) Immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer: recent results, current studies and future perspectives. Eur J Cancer 59:160–170CrossRefPubMed Moehler M, Delic M, Goepfert K et al (2016) Immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer: recent results, current studies and future perspectives. Eur J Cancer 59:160–170CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Urabe M, Ushiku T, Seto Y, Fukayama M (2016) Pathologic response of HER2-positive gastric cancer to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Am J Surg Pathol 40:1326–1333CrossRefPubMed Urabe M, Ushiku T, Seto Y, Fukayama M (2016) Pathologic response of HER2-positive gastric cancer to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Am J Surg Pathol 40:1326–1333CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy
Authors
Rupert Langer
Karen Becker
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2232-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Virchows Archiv 2/2018 Go to the issue