Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Original Article

Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work

Authors: A. van Schaaijk, K. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. H. W. Frings-Dresen, J. K. Sluiter

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Purpose

To assess: (1) whether work ability and work-functioning instruments can detect relevant changes in their respective parameters following a return to work (RTW) and (2) what proportion of those returning to work show changes in their work ability and work functioning.

Methods

A total of 1073 workers who returned to work after at least 2 weeks of sick leave were invited to fill out three questionnaires in the first 8 weeks after RTW. These consisted of an appraisal of general, physical, and mental/emotional work ability (scores 0–10) and a work-functioning questionnaire (scores 0–100). Minimal Important Change (MIC) was defined to determine the proportion of people, whose scores had changed at weeks 5 and 8 following RTW. The Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) was determined to put the MIC in perspective of measurement error.

Results

Of all participants, 235 were eligible for the analysis. All MIC values were below the SDC and thus not suitable for use. The SDC for work ability was 2.2 and 19.9 for work functioning. In the first 5 weeks after RTW, 10–15% showed a relevant, measurable improvement in work ability, and work functioning based on the SDC margins.

Conclusions

Both instruments were unable to identify change after RTW adequately. We can conclude that 10–15% of individuals showed improvement in work ability and work functioning in the first 5 weeks after RTW when SDC is used.

Abma FI, van der Klink JJ, Bultmann U (2013) The work role functioning questionnaire 2.0 (Dutch version): examination of its reliability, validity and responsiveness in the general working population. J Occup Rehabil 23(1):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9379-8 CrossRef

Arends I, van der Klink JJ, van Rhenen W, de Boer MR, Bultmann U (2014) Predictors of recurrent sickness absence among workers having returned to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 40(2):195–202. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3384 CrossRef

Boezeman EJ, Nieuwenhuijsen K, de Bekker-Grob EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Sluiter JK (2015a) The relative importance of the domains of work functioning: evaluations of health-impaired employees, healthy employees, and employers. J Occup Environ Med 57(4):361–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000361 CrossRef

Boezeman EJ, Sluiter JK, Nieuwenhuijsen K (2015b) Measuring work functioning: validity of a weighted composite work functioning approach. J Occup Rehabil 25(3):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9560-3 CrossRef

Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Schultz AB, Edington DW (1999) The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. J Occup Environ Med 41(10):863–877CrossRef

Corrigan PW, McCracken SG (2005) Place first, then train: an alternative to the medical model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Soc Work 50(1):31–39CrossRef

Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR (2003) Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 56(5):395–407CrossRef

de Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden JC (2002) Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond) 52(4):177–181CrossRef

de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006a) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59(10):1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 CrossRef

de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006b) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 CrossRef

de Vet HC et al (2007) Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res 16(1):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9109-9 CrossRef

de Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, Knol D (2011) Measurement in medicine: a practical guide (practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

El Fassi M, Bocquet V, Majery N, Lair ML, Couffignal S, Mairiaux P (2013) Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score. BMC Public Health 13:305. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-305 CrossRef

Endicott J, Nee J (1997) Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects. Psychopharmacol Bull 33(1):13–16

Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B (2005) Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J 47(4):458–472CrossRef

Franche RL, Krause N (2002) Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 12(4):233–256CrossRef

Fritz JM, Hebert J, Koppenhaver S, Parent E (2009) Beyond minimally important change: defining a successful outcome of physical therapy for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(25):2803–2809. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ae2bd4 CrossRef

Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S (2008) Dimensions of work ability. Elsevier, Oxford

Hogelund J, Holm A, McIntosh J (2010) Does graded return-to-work improve sick-listed workers’ chance of returning to regular working hours? J Health Econ 29(1):158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.009 CrossRef

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 160–164 (Chapter 5.2.4) CrossRef

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J (2005) New dimensions of work ability. In: International congress series, 2005, vol 1280. Elsevier, Oxford, p 3–7

Kessler RC et al (2003) The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). J Occup Environ Med 45(2):156–174CrossRef

Koopman C et al (2002) Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med 44(1):14–20CrossRef

Lerner D, Amick BC 3rd, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D (2001) The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care 39(1):72–85CrossRef

Lerner D et al (2003) Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 41(5):649–659. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000062551.76504.A9 CrossRef

McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ (2014) Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA 312(13):1342–1343. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.13128 CrossRef

Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM (1993) The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 4(5):353–365CrossRef

Roelen CA, van Rhenen W, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Twisk JW, Heymans MW (2014) Work ability as prognostic risk marker of disability pension: single-item work ability score versus multi-item work ability index. Scand J Work Environ Health 40(4):428–431. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3428 CrossRef

Rysstad T, Roe Y, Haldorsen B, Svege I, Strand LI (2017) Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1616-z CrossRef

Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, van der Es-Lambeek LC, Ojajarvi A, Verbeek JH (2013) Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD001822 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3 CrossRef

Schneider U, Linder R, Verheyen F (2016) Long-term sick leave and the impact of a graded return-to-work program: evidence from Germany. Eur J Health Econ 17(5):629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0707-8 CrossRef

Schouten LS, Bultmann U, Heymans MW, Joling CI, Twisk JW, Roelen CA (2016) Shortened version of the work ability index to identify workers at risk of long-term sickness absence. Eur J Public Health 26(2):301–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv198 CrossRef

Seing I, MacEachen E, Stahl C, Ekberg K (2015) Early-return-to-work in the context of an intensification of working life and changing employment relationships. J Occup Rehabil 25(1):74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9526-5 CrossRef

Shikiar R, Halpern MT, Rentz AM, Khan ZM (2004) Development of the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ): an instrument for assessing workplace productivity in relation to worker health. Work 22(3):219–229

Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (1998) Work ability index, 2nd edn. Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki

van Roijen L, Essink-Bot ML, Koopmanschap MA, Bonsel G, Rutten FF (1996) Labor and health status in economic evaluation of health care. The Health and Labor Questionnaire. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 12(3):405–415CrossRef

van Kampen DA, Willems WJ, van Beers LW, Castelein RM, Scholtes VA, Terwee CB (2013) Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). J Orthop Surg Res 8:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-40 CrossRef

van Schaaijk A, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Frings-Dresen MHW, Sluiter JK (2018) Reproducibility of work ability and work functioning instruments. Occup Med (Lond) 68(2):116–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqy010 CrossRef

Viikari-Juntura E, MacEachen E (2015) Work modification as a treatment for low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 41(3):219–221. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3494 CrossRef

Viikari-Juntura E et al (2012) Return to work after early part-time sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health 38(2):134–143. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3258 CrossRef

WMA (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 CrossRef

Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR (2005) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8034-z CrossRef

Title: Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
Authors: A. van Schaaijk
K. Nieuwenhuijsen
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen
J. K. Sluiter
Publication date: 01-04-2019
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01400-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Wet work exposure: comparison of observed and self-reported data

Psychological treatments for return to work in individuals on sickness absence due to common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing among women working in the aged care services in Japan

Physical capacity, occupational physical demands, and relative physical strain of older employees in construction and healthcare

Learning on the job, the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies, and their association with telomere length as an indicator of biological aging

New insights on occupational exposure and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis of two Italian case–control studies