Top

Published in:

01-03-2015

Early-Return-to-Work in the Context of an Intensification of Working Life and Changing Employment Relationships

Authors: Ida Seing, Ellen MacEachen, Christian Ståhl, Kerstin Ekberg

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2015

Abstract

Purpose Many Western welfare states have introduced early-return-to-work policies, in which getting sick-listed people back to work before they have fully recovered is presented as a rather unproblematic approach. This reflects a belief in the ability of employers and the labour market to solve sickness absence. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse return-to-work practice in local workplace contexts, in relation to Swedish early-return-to-work policy. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 matched pairs of workers and managers. The material, comprising a total of 36 interviews, was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Three main themes were identified: (1) intensive workplaces and work conditions (2) employer support—a function of worker value and (3) work attachment and resistance to job transition. The results reflected the intensity of modern working life, which challenged return-to-work processes. Managers had different approaches to workers’ return-to-work, depending on how they valued the worker. While managers used the discourse of ‘new opportunities’ and ‘healthy change’ to describe the transition process (e.g. relocation, unemployment and retirement), workers regularly experienced transitions as difficult and unjust. Conclusions In the context of early-return-to-work policy and the intensity of modern working life, a great deal of responsibility was placed on workers to be adaptable to workplace demands in order to be able to return and stay at work. Overall, this study illustrates an emerging social climate where sick-listed workers are positioned as active agents who must take responsibility for sick leave and return-to-work process.

MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘‘hurt versus harm’’ logic in early return to work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2007;5(2):41–62.

Irvine A. Fit for work? The influence of sick pay and job flexibility on sickness absence and implications for presenteeism. Soc Policy Adm. 2011;45(7):752–69.CrossRef

Salais R, Villeneuve R. Europe and the politics of capabilities. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD; 2010.

MacEachen E, Kosny A, Scott-Dixon K, Facey M, Chambers L, Breslin C, Kyle N, Irvin E, Mahood Q, Small Business Systematic Review Team. Workplace health understandings and processes in small businesses: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):180–98.CrossRefPubMed

Burke RJ, Cooper CL. The organization in crisis: downsizing, restructuring, and privatization. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000.

Gowing MK, Kraft JD, Quick JC, editors. The new organizational reality: downsizing, restructuring, and revitalization. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1997.

Gallie D, White M, Cheng Y, Tomlinson M. Restructuring the employment relationship. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.

Howard A. The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

10.

Garsten C. Workplace vagabonds. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.CrossRef

11.

Garsten C, Jacobsson K, editors. Learning to be employable. New agendas on work, responsibility and learning in a globalizing world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.

12.

Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld SE, Houtman ILD. Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work Stress. 2006;20(2):129–44.CrossRef

13.

van der Klink JJ, Blonk RWB, Schene AH, van Dijk FJ. Reducing long-term sickness absence by activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised controlled design. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(6):429–37.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

14.

Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Knol DL, van Mechlen W. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(3):291–8.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Giosselin L. A populationbased, randomised clinical trial on back pain management. Spine. 1997;22(24):2911–8.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, et al. The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine. 2000;25(4):1S–33S.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Friedman PJ. Predictors of work disability in work-related upper-extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39(4):339–43.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 1998;8(2):113–39.CrossRef

21.

Shaw W, Robertson MM, McLellan RK, Verma S, Pransky G. A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry. Work. 2006;26(2):107–14.PubMed

22.

Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Costa-Black KM. Core components of return-to-work interventions. In: Loisel P, Anema H, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.

24.

MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The, “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):349–66.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ståhl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in Swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(3):264–73.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Seing I, Ståhl C, Nordenfelt L, Bülow P, Ekberg K. Policy and practice of work ability. A negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–64.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.CrossRefPubMed

28.

De Vries G, Koeter MWJ, Nabitz U, Hees HL, Schene AH. Return to work after sick leave due to depression; A conceptual analysis based on perspectives of patients, supervisors and occupational physicians. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(3):1017–26.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, Van Dijk FJH. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(104):1–11.

30.

Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lemieux P, Durand M, Hong QN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):293–303.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, De Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, Van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behavior as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(10):817–23.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

33.

Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;20(3):311–21.CrossRef

34.

Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, Cooper L, Button LA, Main CJ. What happens to work if you’re unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1979–89.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Dunstan D, MacEachen E. Bearing the brunt: co-workers’ experiences of work reintegration processes. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):44–54.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Bengtsson M, Berglund T. Labour market policies in transition: from social engineering to standby-ability. In: Larsson B, Letell M, Thörn H, editors. Transformation of the swedish welfare state from social engineering to governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012.

38.

Björnberg U. Social policy reforms in Sweden: new perspectives on rights and obligations. In: Larsson B, Letell M, Thörn H, editors. Transformation of the swedish welfare state from social engineering to governance?. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012.

39.

Hetzler A. Labor market activation policies for the long term ill—a sick idea? Eur J Soc Secur. 2010;11(4):369–403.

40.

Socialförsäkringsutredningen P. Sveriges socialförsäkringar i jämförande perspektiv En institutionell analys av sjuk-, arbetsskade- och arbetslöshetsförsäkringarna i 18 OECD-länder 1930 till 2010 [Sweden’s social insurances in a comparative perspective: An institutionaö analyzis of the sickness-workplace injury- and unemployment insurance in 18 OECD-contries 1930 until 2010]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar 2010.

41.

Proposition. En reformerad sjukskrivningsprocess för ökad återgång i arbete [A reformed sick-leave process for increased return to work] 2007/08:136.

42.

SOU. Mera försäkring och mera arbete [More insurance and more work]. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs 2006:86.

43.

Lippel K, Lötters F. Public insurance systems: a comparison of cause–based and disability‐based income support systems. In: Loisel P, Anema H, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.

44.

Ståhl C, Müssener U, Svensson T. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1404–11.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Iseskog T. Arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsansvar [the employer’s rehabilitation responsibility]. Mölnlycke: Norsteds Juridik AB; 2009.

46.

Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? The Stationery Office; 2006.

47.

Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):209–30.CrossRef

48.

Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2002.

49.

Burchell B, Ladipo D, Wilkingson F, editors. Job insecurity and work intensification. London: Routledge; 2002.

50.

Hellgren J, Sverke M, Näswall K. Changing work roles: new demands and challenges. In: Näswall K, Hellgren J, Sverke M, editors. The individual in the changing working life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

51.

Hood C. A public management for all seasons? Public Administr. 1991;69(1):3–19.CrossRef

52.

Hughes OE. Public management and administration: an introduction. New York: Palgrave; 2003.

53.

Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Public management reform. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

54.

Sandberg Å, editor. Nordic lights. Work, management and welfare in Scandinavia. Falun: SNS Förlag; 2013.

55.

Bohle P, Quinlan M, Mayhew C. The health and safety effects of job insecurity: an evaluation of the evidence. Econ Labour Relat Rev. 2001;12(1):32–60.CrossRef

56.

Vahtera JKM, Pentti J, Theorell T, Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: a seven year follow up of initially healthy employees; 2000.

57.

Vahtera JKMPJ. Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees. Lancet. 1997;350(9085):1124–8.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Semmer NK, Tschan F, Meier LL, Facchin S, Jacobshagen N. Illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior. Appl Psychol. 2010;59(1):70–96.CrossRef

59.

Eakin JM. Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspectives on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(4):689–704.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Eakin J, MacEachen E, Clarke J. ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–42.

61.

Garsten C, Jacobsson K. Sorting people in and out: the plasticity of the categories of employability, work capacity and disability as technologies of government. Ephemera. 2013;13(4):825–50.

62.

Jacobsson K, Seing I. En möjliggörande arbetsmarknadspolitik? Arbetsförmedlingens utredning och klassificering av klienters arbetsförmåga, anställbarhet och funktionshinder [An enabling labour market policy? The public employment service’s assessment and classification of clients’ work ability, employability and disability]. Arbetsmarknad och Arbetsliv [Labour market and Working life]. 2013;19(1):9–24.

63.

Arbetsförmedlingen. Statistikenheten [The statistical unit]; 2011.

64.

Holmqvist M. Medicalization of unemployment: individualizing social issues as personal problems in the Swedish welfare state. Work Employ Soc. 2009;23(3):405–21.CrossRef

65.

Peralta Prieto J. Den sjuka arbetslösheten [The sick unemployment]. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2006.

66.

Anderson N, Schalk R. The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. J Organiz Behav. 1998;19:637–47.CrossRef

67.

Conway N, Briner RB. Understanding psychological contracts at work: a critical evaluation of theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.CrossRef

68.

Miller P, Rose N. Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity; 2008.

69.

Rose N. Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.CrossRef

70.

Garsten C, Lindvert J, Thedvall R, editors. Arbetets marknad: Arbetsmarknandens nya organisering [The labour’s market: The labour market’s new organization]. Liber: Malmö; 2011.

71.

SSIA. Sjukskrivningar i olika yrken under 2000-talet: Antal ersatta sjukskrivningsdagar per anställd år 2002–2010 [Sick-listed in different occupations during 2000s: Amount of compensated sickness days per employee in year 2002–2010]. Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency 2012 Contract No.: ISSN 1654-8574.

Title: Early-Return-to-Work in the Context of an Intensification of Working Life and Changing Employment Relationships
Authors: Ida Seing
Ellen MacEachen
Christian Ståhl
Kerstin Ekberg
Publication date: 01-03-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9526-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Early-Return-to-Work in the Context of an Intensification of Working Life and Changing Employment Relationships

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

The Role of the Australian Workplace Return to Work Coordinator: Essential Qualities and Attributes

Factors Related to Participation in Paid Work After Organ Transplantation: Perceptions of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Validation of the 4DSQ Somatization Subscale in the Occupational Health Care Setting as a Screener

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, Internal Consistency and Validation of the Hand Function Sort (HFS©) for French Speaking Patients with Upper Limb Complaints

Reference Values for the SF-36 in Canadian Injured Workers Undergoing Rehabilitation

The Impact of Family and Work-Related Social Support on Musculoskeletal Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review