Skip to main content
Top

08-05-2024 | Perampanel | Original Communication

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy aged 4–12 years: a real-world study

Authors: Qiao Zeng, Xueqian Xia, Li Jiang, Jin Chen, Yuhang Liu, Yue Hu

Published in: Journal of Neurology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) as an adjunctive therapy in children aged 4–12 years with epilepsy.

Methods

We performed a non-randomized, open-label, placebo-uncontrolled, real-world self-controlled study that included 216 young children (aged 4–12 years) with epilepsy who received PER as adjunctive therapy at the children’s hospital affiliated with Chongqing Medical University from July 4, 2020, to September 20, 2023.

Results

(1) The efficacy rates of adjunctive PER therapy at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 62.8%, 67.8%, 65.3%, and 61.2%, respectively. PER showed efficacy in alleviating focal seizures, generalized tonic–clonic seizures, myoclonic seizures, and absence seizures. The efficacy rates for variants of self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) were 89.5% and 66.7%, respectively. (2) Focal non-motor onset seizures with or without impaired awareness, focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (FBTCS), LGS, variants of SeLECTS, the number of concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs), a family history of epilepsy, and focal lesions on cranial magnetic resonance imaging were independent factors affecting efficacy. The order of PER addition did not affect efficacy. The retention rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 90.7%, 84.7%, 74.7%, 64.9%, respectively. (3) Adverse reactions occurred in 45 patients (45/216, 20.8%), with irritability/aggressive behavior (18/216, 8.3%) and somnolence (14/216, 6.5%) being the most common. Twelve patients (12/216, 5.6%) withdrew from the study because of adverse reactions.

Conclusion

In young Chinese children with epilepsy, PER is effective, safe, and well-tolerated as an adjunctive therapy, making it a viable option for use with broad-spectrum ASMs.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Weiping L, Dong Z, Zhen H et al (2021) Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients from China with focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of phase III double-blind and open-label extension studies. CNS Neurosci Ther 27(3):330–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13458CrossRefPubMed Weiping L, Dong Z, Zhen H et al (2021) Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients from China with focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of phase III double-blind and open-label extension studies. CNS Neurosci Ther 27(3):330–340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​cns.​13458CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Stevelink R, Al-Toma D, Jansen FE et al (2023) Individualised prediction of drug resistance and seizure recurrence after medication withdrawal in people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Epilepsia 64(9):2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17683CrossRef Stevelink R, Al-Toma D, Jansen FE et al (2023) Individualised prediction of drug resistance and seizure recurrence after medication withdrawal in people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Epilepsia 64(9):2330–2341. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​epi.​17683CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy aged 4–12 years: a real-world study
Authors
Qiao Zeng
Xueqian Xia
Li Jiang
Jin Chen
Yuhang Liu
Yue Hu
Publication date
08-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12416-y