Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Non-progressive labor in the second stage leading to vacuum extraction is a risk factor for recurrent non-progressive labor

Authors: Avi Harlev, Sarah K. Fatool, Ruslan Sergienko, Eyal Sheiner

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To address risk factors and perinatal outcomes after vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) due to non-progressive labor (NPL) 2nd stage, and to assess its impact on the subsequent delivery.

Methods

A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Maternal characteristics, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies that resulted in VAD due to NPL 2nd stage were compared to those that resulted in VAD due to other indications. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed.

Results

Out of 202,462 singleton deliveries, 3.4% were delivered using VAD. Of these, 1928 VAD due to NPL 2nd stage and 4985 VAD due to other indications were identified. Independent risk factors for VAD due to NPL 2nd stage were identified: advanced gestational age, pre-eclampsia, and labor induction. VAD due to NPL 2nd stage in the index pregnancy was noted as an independent risk factor for NPL 1st stage and NPL 2nd stage during the subsequent pregnancy.

Conclusion

VAD due to NPL 2nd stage results in adverse perinatal outcome in the index and subsequent pregnancies. VAD due to NPL 2nd stage in the index pregnancy is an independent risk factor for NPL 1st stage and NPL 2nd stage during the subsequent pregnancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stephenson P (1992) International differences in the use of obstetrical interventions. 1992, WHO (EUR/ICP/MCH), Copenhagen. p 112 Stephenson P (1992) International differences in the use of obstetrical interventions. 1992, WHO (EUR/ICP/MCH), Copenhagen. p 112
2.
go back to reference Mahlotra N, Puri R, Malhotra J (2014) Operative obstetrics and gynecology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, New Delhi, p 198 Mahlotra N, Puri R, Malhotra J (2014) Operative obstetrics and gynecology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, New Delhi, p 198
3.
go back to reference Kjaergaard H et al (2009) Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(4):402–407CrossRefPubMed Kjaergaard H et al (2009) Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(4):402–407CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Feinstein U et al (2002) Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77(1):7–14CrossRefPubMed Feinstein U et al (2002) Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77(1):7–14CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT (2006) Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth 33(4):315–322CrossRefPubMed Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT (2006) Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth 33(4):315–322CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB (2004) How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):933–938CrossRefPubMed Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB (2004) How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):933–938CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shmueli A et al (2016) Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term (.). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 8:1–4 Shmueli A et al (2016) Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term (.). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 8:1–4
9.
go back to reference Beucher G (2008) Maternal morbidity after operative vaginal delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 37 Suppl 8: S244–59CrossRef Beucher G (2008) Maternal morbidity after operative vaginal delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 37 Suppl 8: S244–59CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rouhe H et al (2009) Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. BJOG 116(1):67–73CrossRefPubMed Rouhe H et al (2009) Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. BJOG 116(1):67–73CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2004) Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 328(7435):311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2004) Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 328(7435):311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Elvander C et al (2015) Mode of delivery and the probability of subsequent childbearing: a population-based register study. BJOG 122(12):1593–1600CrossRefPubMed Elvander C et al (2015) Mode of delivery and the probability of subsequent childbearing: a population-based register study. BJOG 122(12):1593–1600CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Elvander C et al (2013) Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(10):1175–1182PubMed Elvander C et al (2013) Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(10):1175–1182PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Sandström A et al (2012) Labour dystocia–risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour—a population-based cohort study. BJOG 119(13):1648–1656CrossRefPubMed Sandström A et al (2012) Labour dystocia–risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour—a population-based cohort study. BJOG 119(13):1648–1656CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tobias T et al (2015) Does dystocia during labor pose a risk factor for another non-progressive labor during the subsequent delivery? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(9):1099–1103CrossRefPubMed Tobias T et al (2015) Does dystocia during labor pose a risk factor for another non-progressive labor during the subsequent delivery? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 28(9):1099–1103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Elvander C, Cnattingius S (2016) Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(3):362–367CrossRefPubMed Elvander C, Cnattingius S (2016) Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 95(3):362–367CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Melamed N et al (2009) Pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery after a previous operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114(4):757–763CrossRefPubMed Melamed N et al (2009) Pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery after a previous operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114(4):757–763CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Williams PJ, Broughton Pipkin F (2011) The genetics of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):405–417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williams PJ, Broughton Pipkin F (2011) The genetics of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):405–417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Lurie S et al (2013) Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery. J Perinat Med 41(3):283–286CrossRefPubMed Lurie S et al (2013) Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery. J Perinat Med 41(3):283–286CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Melamed N, Yogev Y, Stainmetz S, Ben-Haroush A (2009 Aug) What happens when vacuum extraction fails? Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(2):243–248CrossRefPubMed Melamed N, Yogev Y, Stainmetz S, Ben-Haroush A (2009 Aug) What happens when vacuum extraction fails? Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(2):243–248CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kessous R, Tirosh D, Weintraub AY, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Sergienko R, Sheiner E (2013) Second stage disorders in patients following a previous cesarean section: vacuum versus repeated cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1075–1079CrossRefPubMed Kessous R, Tirosh D, Weintraub AY, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Sergienko R, Sheiner E (2013) Second stage disorders in patients following a previous cesarean section: vacuum versus repeated cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1075–1079CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sheiner E et al (2002) Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81(3):222–226PubMed Sheiner E et al (2002) Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81(3):222–226PubMed
Metadata
Title
Non-progressive labor in the second stage leading to vacuum extraction is a risk factor for recurrent non-progressive labor
Authors
Avi Harlev
Sarah K. Fatool
Ruslan Sergienko
Eyal Sheiner
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4359-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2017 Go to the issue