Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2014

01-10-2014 | General Gynecology

Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study

Authors: Taner A. Usta, Tolga Karacan, M. Murat Naki, Aysel Calık, Lale Turkgeldi, Volkan Kasimogullari

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) operations conducted using standard 2-D and 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems and discuss the findings with regard to the recent literature.

Methods

Data from 147 patients who underwent TLH operations with 2-D or 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, during 2 year period between December 2010 and December 2012, were reviewed retrospectively. TLH operations were divided into two groups as those performed using 2-D, and those performed using 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems.

Results

A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the operation times (p = 0.037 < 0.05). The mean operation time of the 2-D laparoscopy group (134.2 ± 61.8 min) was higher than the 3-D laparoscopy group (116.8 ± 38.5 min). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2-D and 3-D groups with respect to major, minor and total complication rates (p = 0.641 > 0.05). The operation time among obese patients was significantly shorter in those in the 3-D laparoscopy group than those in the 2-D group (p = 0.041 < 0.05).

Conclusions

Recent literature indicates that 3-D laparoscopy vision system needs to be utilized more often and a higher number of ex vivo and in vivo studies have to be conducted. Furthermore, we believe that the prevalent problems encountered during laparoscopy can be overcome by the development of real-time vision devices and the appropriate training of the laparoscopists. 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision system will help to improve surgical performance and outcome of patients undergoing gynecological minimal invasive surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193:519–522PubMedCrossRef Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193:519–522PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dubrowski A, Park J, Moulton CA, Larmer J, MacRae H (2007) A comparison of single- and multiple-stage approaches to teaching laparoscopic suturing. Am J Surg 193:269–273PubMedCrossRef Dubrowski A, Park J, Moulton CA, Larmer J, MacRae H (2007) A comparison of single- and multiple-stage approaches to teaching laparoscopic suturing. Am J Surg 193:269–273PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, Clayton R, Phillips G, Whittaker M, Lilford R, Bridgman S, Brown J (2004) The eVALuate study: two paralel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 328:129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, Clayton R, Phillips G, Whittaker M, Lilford R, Bridgman S, Brown J (2004) The eVALuate study: two paralel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 328:129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 114:1156–8 Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 114:1156–8
5.
go back to reference Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (>280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:131–134PubMedCrossRef Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (>280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:131–134PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jeung IC, Baek JM, Park EK, Lee HN, Kim CJ, Park TC, Lee YS (2010) A prospective comparison of vaginal stump suturing techniques during total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:631–638PubMedCrossRef Jeung IC, Baek JM, Park EK, Lee HN, Kim CJ, Park TC, Lee YS (2010) A prospective comparison of vaginal stump suturing techniques during total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:631–638PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cogan AI (1979) The relationship between the apparent vertical and the vertical horopter. Vision Res 19:655–665PubMedCrossRef Cogan AI (1979) The relationship between the apparent vertical and the vertical horopter. Vision Res 19:655–665PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schor LE, Tyler CW (1981) Spatio-temporal properties of Panum’s fusional area. Vision Res 21:683–692PubMedCrossRef Schor LE, Tyler CW (1981) Spatio-temporal properties of Panum’s fusional area. Vision Res 21:683–692PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Salamanca JI, Mandhani A, Leung RA, Rao SR, Berryhill R, Tewari A (2009) Does 3-Dimensional (3-D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy? World J Urol 27:95–99PubMedCrossRef Ramanathan R, Salamanca JI, Mandhani A, Leung RA, Rao SR, Berryhill R, Tewari A (2009) Does 3-Dimensional (3-D) visualization improve the quality of assistance during robotic radical prostatectomy? World J Urol 27:95–99PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Merritt JO (1987) Visual-Motor Realism In 3D Teleoperator Display Systems. İn: SPIE True Three Dimensional Imaging Techniques and Display Technologies 761: 88–93 Merritt JO (1987) Visual-Motor Realism In 3D Teleoperator Display Systems. İn: SPIE True Three Dimensional Imaging Techniques and Display Technologies 761: 88–93
12.
go back to reference Coren S, Ward LM (1989) Sensation and perception, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Florida, pp 274–303 Coren S, Ward LM (1989) Sensation and perception, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Florida, pp 274–303
13.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248–251PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248–251PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1:40–46PubMed Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, Buess G (1993) 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1:40–46PubMed
15.
go back to reference Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32:110–118PubMedCrossRef Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg 32:110–118PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26:2961–2968PubMedCrossRef Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA (2012) Three dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc 26:2961–2968PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19:1212–1215PubMedCrossRef Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19:1212–1215PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol 26:1085–1088PubMedCrossRef Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, Knoll T (2012) Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol 26:1085–1088PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472PubMedCrossRef Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference LaGrange CA, Clark CJ, Gerber EW, Strup SE (2008) Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 22:511–516PubMedCrossRef LaGrange CA, Clark CJ, Gerber EW, Strup SE (2008) Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy. J Endourol 22:511–516PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 10:371–374PubMedCrossRef McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 10:371–374PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24:1132–1143PubMedCrossRef Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Shiraishi N, Kitano S, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24:1132–1143PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study
Authors
Taner A. Usta
Tolga Karacan
M. Murat Naki
Aysel Calık
Lale Turkgeldi
Volkan Kasimogullari
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3253-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2014 Go to the issue