Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Handsurgery

Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer

Authors: Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor, Steffen Ziegler, Christoph Harms, Julia Neumann, Alessandra Cristalli, Axel Kalpen, Günther Kundt, Thomas Mittlmeier, K. J. Prommersberger

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

For clinical grip force assessment, the Jamar dynamometer is a wide accepted tool. Users have to be aware that this method does not represent all grip efforts applied. The Manugraphy system is a tool that measure total grip force as well as identify load distribution patterns of the hand while gripping cylinders wrapped with calibrated capacitive matrix sensor mats. The aim of this study was to validate an assessment setting of the Manugraphy system for clinical use. Further, the relationship and difference between the Manugraphy system and the Jamar dynamometer were investigated.

Materials and methods

At two study centers, 152 healthy volunteers performed grip force tests with a digital Jamar dynamometer using handle positions 3 and 4 and the novel® Manugraphy system using two cylinders with circumferences of 150 and 200 mm. The subjects performed grip force testing with both devices on three different days. The intra- and inter-day variability for both methods was evaluated. To compare the values of both systems, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated.

Results

The force values, as measured by the sensor matrix, were higher than those of the Jamar dynamometer. Analyses showed significant positive correlations between values obtained by the two measurement methods (p < 0.001). There was no significant inter-day variation for the 200-mm cylinder of the Manugraphy system. For the 150-mm cylinder, a significant variation was observed at center B, but not at A. Nevertheless, the fluctuation of the grip force values obtained with the Manugraphy system was equal or better than those obtained with the Jamar dynamometer.

Conclusions

The force values, obtained using the two systems, have a high correlation but are not directly comparable. Both systems allow valid and constant grip force measurement. As the sensor mat detects all forces applied perpendicularly to the cylinder surface, it characterizes grip force better than the Jamar dynamometer. In addition, information about load distribution of the hand is gained.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bear-Lehman J, Abreu BC (1989) Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther 69:1025–1033PubMed Bear-Lehman J, Abreu BC (1989) Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther 69:1025–1033PubMed
2.
go back to reference Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40:423–429CrossRefPubMed Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40:423–429CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wimer B, Dong RG, Welcome DE, Warren C, McDowell TW (2009) Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip strength applied on a cylindrical handle. Med Eng Phys 31:695–704CrossRefPubMed Wimer B, Dong RG, Welcome DE, Warren C, McDowell TW (2009) Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip strength applied on a cylindrical handle. Med Eng Phys 31:695–704CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference McDowell TW, Wimer BM, Welcome DE, Warren C, Dong RG (2012) Effects of handle size and shape on measured grip strength. Int J Ind Ergon 42:199–205CrossRef McDowell TW, Wimer BM, Welcome DE, Warren C, Dong RG (2012) Effects of handle size and shape on measured grip strength. Int J Ind Ergon 42:199–205CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Welcome DE, Rakheja S, Dong RG, Wu JZ, Schopper AW (2004) An investigation on the relationship between grip, push, and contact forces applied to a tool handle. Int J Ind Ergon 34:507–518CrossRef Welcome DE, Rakheja S, Dong RG, Wu JZ, Schopper AW (2004) An investigation on the relationship between grip, push, and contact forces applied to a tool handle. Int J Ind Ergon 34:507–518CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Amis AA (1987) Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. J Biomed Eng 9:313–320CrossRefPubMed Amis AA (1987) Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. J Biomed Eng 9:313–320CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Seo NJ, Armstrong TJ (2008) Investigation of grip force, normal force, contact area, hand size, and handle size for cylindrical handles. Hum Factor 50:734–744CrossRef Seo NJ, Armstrong TJ (2008) Investigation of grip force, normal force, contact area, hand size, and handle size for cylindrical handles. Hum Factor 50:734–744CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aldien Y, Welcome D, Rakheja S, Dong RG, Boileau PE (2005) Contact pressure distribution at hand-handle interface: role of hand forces and handle size. Int J Ind Ergon 35:267–286CrossRef Aldien Y, Welcome D, Rakheja S, Dong RG, Boileau PE (2005) Contact pressure distribution at hand-handle interface: role of hand forces and handle size. Int J Ind Ergon 35:267–286CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dong RG, Wu JZ, Welcome DE, McDowell TW (2008) A new approach to characterize grip force applied to a cylindrical handle. Med Eng Phys 30:20–33CrossRefPubMed Dong RG, Wu JZ, Welcome DE, McDowell TW (2008) A new approach to characterize grip force applied to a cylindrical handle. Med Eng Phys 30:20–33CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pataky TC, Slota GP, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2012) Radial force distribution changes associated with tangential force production in cylindrical grasping, and the importance of anatomical registration. J Biomech 45:218–224CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pataky TC, Slota GP, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2012) Radial force distribution changes associated with tangential force production in cylindrical grasping, and the importance of anatomical registration. J Biomech 45:218–224CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Debeliso MA, McChesney JW, Murdock LE (2013) Grip norms and reliability of the hand grip ForceMap system. J Hand Surg Eur 38:1009–1010CrossRef Debeliso MA, McChesney JW, Murdock LE (2013) Grip norms and reliability of the hand grip ForceMap system. J Hand Surg Eur 38:1009–1010CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kutz DF, Wolfel A, Timmann D, Kolb FP (2007) Detection of changes in grip forces on a sliding object. J Neurosci Methods 166:250–258CrossRefPubMed Kutz DF, Wolfel A, Timmann D, Kolb FP (2007) Detection of changes in grip forces on a sliding object. J Neurosci Methods 166:250–258CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Polliack AA, Sieh RC, Craig DD, Landsberger S, McNeil DR, Ayyappa E (2000) Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit. Prosthet Orthot Int 24:63–73CrossRefPubMed Polliack AA, Sieh RC, Craig DD, Landsberger S, McNeil DR, Ayyappa E (2000) Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit. Prosthet Orthot Int 24:63–73CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fess EE (1992) Grip strength. In: Casanova JS (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd edn. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago, pp 41–45 Fess EE (1992) Grip strength. In: Casanova JS (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd edn. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago, pp 41–45
15.
go back to reference O’Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR, An KN (1992) The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am 17:169–177CrossRefPubMed O’Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR, An KN (1992) The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am 17:169–177CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Bear-Lehman J, Yu TY (2011) A test case: does the availability of visual feedback impact grip strength scores when using a digital dynamometer? J Hand Ther 24:266–275CrossRefPubMed Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Bear-Lehman J, Yu TY (2011) A test case: does the availability of visual feedback impact grip strength scores when using a digital dynamometer? J Hand Ther 24:266–275CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 9:222–226CrossRefPubMed Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 9:222–226CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Seo NJ, Shim JK, Engel AK, Enders LR (2011) Grip surface affects maximum pinch force. Hum Factors 53:740–748CrossRefPubMed Seo NJ, Shim JK, Engel AK, Enders LR (2011) Grip surface affects maximum pinch force. Hum Factors 53:740–748CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Solomon HY, Turvey MT, Burton G (1989) Gravitational and muscular variables in perceiving rod extent by wielding. Ecol Psychol 1:265–300CrossRef Solomon HY, Turvey MT, Burton G (1989) Gravitational and muscular variables in perceiving rod extent by wielding. Ecol Psychol 1:265–300CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee JW, Rim K (1991) Measurement of finger joint angles and maximum finger forces during cylinder grip activity. J Biomed Eng 13:152–162CrossRefPubMed Lee JW, Rim K (1991) Measurement of finger joint angles and maximum finger forces during cylinder grip activity. J Biomed Eng 13:152–162CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Keir PJ, Wells RP, Ranney DA (1996) Passive properties of the forearm musculature with reference to hand and finger postures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:401–409CrossRef Keir PJ, Wells RP, Ranney DA (1996) Passive properties of the forearm musculature with reference to hand and finger postures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:401–409CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Young VL, Pin P, Kraemer BA, Gould RB, Nemergut L, Pellowski M (1989) Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects. J Hand Surg Am 14:125–129CrossRefPubMed Young VL, Pin P, Kraemer BA, Gould RB, Nemergut L, Pellowski M (1989) Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects. J Hand Surg Am 14:125–129CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nitschke JE, McMeeken JM, Burry HC, Matyas TA (1999) When is a change a genuine change? A clinically meaningful interpretation of grip strength measurements in healthy and disabled women. J Hand Ther 12:25–30CrossRefPubMed Nitschke JE, McMeeken JM, Burry HC, Matyas TA (1999) When is a change a genuine change? A clinically meaningful interpretation of grip strength measurements in healthy and disabled women. J Hand Ther 12:25–30CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer
Authors
Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor
Steffen Ziegler
Christoph Harms
Julia Neumann
Alessandra Cristalli
Axel Kalpen
Günther Kundt
Thomas Mittlmeier
K. J. Prommersberger
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2014 Go to the issue