Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Paper

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without concomitant coronary artery disease: comparison of characteristics and early outcome in the German multicenter TAVI registry

Authors: Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Ralf Zahn, Martin Horack, Ulrich Gerckens, Gerhard Schuler, Horst Sievert, Christoph Naber, Matthias Voehringer, Ulrich Schäfer, Jochen Senges, Gert Richardt

Published in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To examine the prevalence and impact of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) on short-term outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Background

The prevalence of CAD in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement is estimated at 30–50 % and its presence increases procedural risk. The prevalence and impact of CAD on outcome after TAVI are not well defined.

Methods

We analyzed 1,382 patients enrolled in the German TAVI registry; the majority (81 %) received the Medtronic CoreValve. The presence of coronary lesions with ≥50 % stenosis on pre-TAVI angiography defined the existence of concomitant CAD.

Results

859 patients (62.2 %) had concomitant CAD, of which 534 (62.3 %) had multi-vessel and 83 (9.7 %) left main disease. Patients with CAD were younger (81.5 ± 6.1 vs. 82.1 ± 6.3 years, p < 0.05), more commonly males (49.4 vs. 30.0 %, p < 0.0001) and diabetics (36.9 vs. 31.2 %, p < 0.05), and had a worse Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class at baseline compared to patients with no CAD. During TAVI patients with CAD more often required additional coronary intervention and had longer procedures, but procedural success rates were similar (97.1 vs. 97.7 %). Crude in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with CAD (10.0 vs. 5.5 %, OR 1.90, 95 % CI 1.23–2.93), but this was not significant after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR 1.41, 95 % CI 0.85–2.33). Both groups had significant improvement in 30-day symptoms and quality of life.

Conclusion

The prevalence of CAD in contemporary TAVI patients is high. Its presence characterizes a high-risk population and is associated with increased crude short-term mortality, largely explained by co-morbidities, but does not limit functional improvement after TAVI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, PARTNER Trial Investigators et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607PubMedCrossRef Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, PARTNER Trial Investigators et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, PARTNER Trial Investigators et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198PubMedCrossRef Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, PARTNER Trial Investigators et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364:2187–2198PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Figulla L, Neumann A, Figulla HR et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacy compared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature. Clin Res Cardiol 100:265–276PubMedCrossRef Figulla L, Neumann A, Figulla HR et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacy compared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature. Clin Res Cardiol 100:265–276PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L et al (2007) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using second and current third generation self expanding CoreValve prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:69–76PubMedCrossRef Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L et al (2007) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using second and current third generation self expanding CoreValve prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:69–76PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Motloch LJ, Rottlaender D, Reda S et al (2012) Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 101:45–53PubMedCrossRef Motloch LJ, Rottlaender D, Reda S et al (2012) Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 101:45–53PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T et al (2010) Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: a European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 122:62–69PubMedCrossRef Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T et al (2010) Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: a European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 122:62–69PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early results of the FRANCE (FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J 32:191–197PubMedCrossRef Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early results of the FRANCE (FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J 32:191–197PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J 32:198–204PubMedCrossRef Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E et al (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J 32:198–204PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A et al (2011) Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 123:299–308PubMedCrossRef Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A et al (2011) Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 123:299–308PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Puls M, Viel T, Danner BC, Jacobshagen C, et al (2012) The risk-to-benefit ratio of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in specific patient cohorts: a single-centre experience. Clin Res Cardiol (Epub ahead of print) Puls M, Viel T, Danner BC, Jacobshagen C, et al (2012) The risk-to-benefit ratio of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in specific patient cohorts: a single-centre experience. Clin Res Cardiol (Epub ahead of print)
11.
go back to reference Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK et al (1997) Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:630–634PubMedCrossRef Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK et al (1997) Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:630–634PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lund O, Nielsen TT, Pilegaard HK, Magnussen K, Knudsen MA (1990) The influence of coronary artery disease and bypass grafting on early and late survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 100:327–337PubMed Lund O, Nielsen TT, Pilegaard HK, Magnussen K, Knudsen MA (1990) The influence of coronary artery disease and bypass grafting on early and late survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 100:327–337PubMed
13.
go back to reference Iung B, Drissi MF, Michel PL et al (1993) Prognosis of valve replacement for aortic stenosis with or without coexisting coronary heart disease: a comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis 2:430–439PubMed Iung B, Drissi MF, Michel PL et al (1993) Prognosis of valve replacement for aortic stenosis with or without coexisting coronary heart disease: a comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis 2:430–439PubMed
14.
go back to reference Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP et al (2001) Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:885–892PubMedCrossRef Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP et al (2001) Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:885–892PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dewey TM, Brown DL, Herbert MA et al (2010) Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural, late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 89:758–767PubMedCrossRef Dewey TM, Brown DL, Herbert MA et al (2010) Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural, late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 89:758–767PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Masson JB, Lee M, Boone RH et al (2010) Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:165–173PubMedCrossRef Masson JB, Lee M, Boone RH et al (2010) Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:165–173PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P (2001) Risk factors for early mortality after valve surgery in Europe in the 1990s: lessons from the EuroSCORE pilot program. J Heart Valve Dis 10:572–577PubMed Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P (2001) Risk factors for early mortality after valve surgery in Europe in the 1990s: lessons from the EuroSCORE pilot program. J Heart Valve Dis 10:572–577PubMed
18.
go back to reference Grube E, Buellesfeld L, Mueller R et al (2008) Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the Corevalve revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:167–175PubMedCrossRef Grube E, Buellesfeld L, Mueller R et al (2008) Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the Corevalve revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:167–175PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116:755–763PubMedCrossRef Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116:755–763PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E et al (2011) Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:253–269PubMedCrossRef Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E et al (2011) Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:253–269PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Exadactylos N, Sugrue DD, Oakley CM (1984) Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis. Br Heart J 51:121–124PubMedCrossRef Exadactylos N, Sugrue DD, Oakley CM (1984) Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis. Br Heart J 51:121–124PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH et al (1994) Aortic valve replacement: determinants of operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 57:1140–1146PubMedCrossRef He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH et al (1994) Aortic valve replacement: determinants of operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 57:1140–1146PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243PubMedCrossRef Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Antonini-Canterin F, Leiballi E, Capanna M et al (2009) Association between carotid and coronary artery disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis: an angiographic study. Angiology 60:596–600PubMedCrossRef Antonini-Canterin F, Leiballi E, Capanna M et al (2009) Association between carotid and coronary artery disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis: an angiographic study. Angiology 60:596–600PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wenaweser P, Pilgrim T, Guerios E et al (2011) Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 7:541–548PubMedCrossRef Wenaweser P, Pilgrim T, Guerios E et al (2011) Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 7:541–548PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gautier M, Pepin M, Himbert D et al (2011) Impact of coronary artery disease on indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and on procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention 7:549–555PubMedCrossRef Gautier M, Pepin M, Himbert D et al (2011) Impact of coronary artery disease on indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and on procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention 7:549–555PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Abdel-Wahab M, Mostafa AE, Richardt G (2012) A case of rotational atherectomy after implantation of the medtronic corevalve bioprosthesis. Clin Res Cardiol (Epub ahead of print) Abdel-Wahab M, Mostafa AE, Richardt G (2012) A case of rotational atherectomy after implantation of the medtronic corevalve bioprosthesis. Clin Res Cardiol (Epub ahead of print)
28.
go back to reference Conradi L, Seiffert M, Franzen O et al (2011) First experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol 100:311–316PubMedCrossRef Conradi L, Seiffert M, Franzen O et al (2011) First experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol 100:311–316PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Abdel-Wahab M, Mostafa AE, Geist V et al (2012) Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with pre-procedural percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 109:581–586PubMedCrossRef Abdel-Wahab M, Mostafa AE, Geist V et al (2012) Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with pre-procedural percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 109:581–586PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Mostafa AE, Geist V, Abdel-Wahab M (2011) Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a combined transfemoral procedure. J Invasive Cardiol 23:E102–E105PubMed Mostafa AE, Geist V, Abdel-Wahab M (2011) Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a combined transfemoral procedure. J Invasive Cardiol 23:E102–E105PubMed
Metadata
Title
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with and without concomitant coronary artery disease: comparison of characteristics and early outcome in the German multicenter TAVI registry
Authors
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Ralf Zahn
Martin Horack
Ulrich Gerckens
Gerhard Schuler
Horst Sievert
Christoph Naber
Matthias Voehringer
Ulrich Schäfer
Jochen Senges
Gert Richardt
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Electronic ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-012-0486-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Clinical Research in Cardiology 12/2012 Go to the issue