Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Heart and Vessels 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement

Authors: Sayuri Yamabe, Yoshihiro Dohi, Akifumi Higashi, Hiroki Kinoshita, Yoshiharu Sada, Takayuki Hidaka, Satoshi Kurisu, Nobuo Shiode, Yasuki Kihara, HERO (Hiroshima Heart Study Group) Investigators

Published in: Heart and Vessels | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) gradually regressed after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Sokolow–Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5/6) is possibly the most widely used criterion for ECG-LVH. The aim of this study was to determine whether decrease in Sokolow–Lyon voltage reflects left ventricular reverse remodeling detected by echocardiography after AVR. Of 129 consecutive patients who underwent AVR for severe aortic stenosis, 38 patients with preoperative ECG-LVH, defined by SV1 + RV5/6 of ≥3.5 mV, were enrolled in this study. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The patients were divided into ECG-LVH regression group (n = 19) and non-regression group (n = 19) according to the median value of the absolute regression in SV1 + RV5/6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants of ECG-LVH regression among echocardiographic indices. ECG-LVH regression group showed significantly greater decrease in left ventricular mass index and left ventricular dimensions than Non-regression group. ECG-LVH regression was independently determined by decrease in the left ventricular mass index [odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.69, p = 0.048], left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (OR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.03–1.41, p = 0.014), and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.06–1.52, p = 0.0047). ECG-LVH regression could be a marker of the effect of AVR on both reducing the left ventricular mass index and left ventricular dimensions. The effect of AVR on reverse remodeling can be estimated, at least in part, by regression of ECG-LVH.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Greve AM, Boman K, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kesäniemi YA, Nienaber C, Ray S, Egstrup K, Rossebø AB, Devereux RB, Køber L, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K (2012) Clinical implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular strain and hypertrophy in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study. Circulation 125:346–353CrossRefPubMed Greve AM, Boman K, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kesäniemi YA, Nienaber C, Ray S, Egstrup K, Rossebø AB, Devereux RB, Køber L, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K (2012) Clinical implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular strain and hypertrophy in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study. Circulation 125:346–353CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shah AS, Chin CW, Vassiliou V, Cowell SJ, Doris M, Kwok TC, Semple S, Zamvar V, White AC, McKillop G, Boon NA, Prasad SK, Mills NL, Newby DE, Dweck MR (2014) Left ventricular hypertrophy with strain and aortic stenosis. Circulation 130:1607–1616CrossRefPubMed Shah AS, Chin CW, Vassiliou V, Cowell SJ, Doris M, Kwok TC, Semple S, Zamvar V, White AC, McKillop G, Boon NA, Prasad SK, Mills NL, Newby DE, Dweck MR (2014) Left ventricular hypertrophy with strain and aortic stenosis. Circulation 130:1607–1616CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sokolow M, Lyon TP (1949) The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 37:161–186CrossRefPubMed Sokolow M, Lyon TP (1949) The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J 37:161–186CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Ishihara M, Shimatani Y, Nakama Y, Maruhashi T, Kagawa E, Dai K, Matsushita J, Ikenaga H (2009) The decrease in QRS amplitude after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Electrocardiol 42:410–413CrossRefPubMed Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Ishihara M, Shimatani Y, Nakama Y, Maruhashi T, Kagawa E, Dai K, Matsushita J, Ikenaga H (2009) The decrease in QRS amplitude after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Electrocardiol 42:410–413CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, Fremes SE, Buth KJ, Sever JY, Rao V, Panagiotopoulos KP, Murphy PM, Goldman BS (1996) Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1084–1089CrossRefPubMed Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, Fremes SE, Buth KJ, Sever JY, Rao V, Panagiotopoulos KP, Murphy PM, Goldman BS (1996) Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1084–1089CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Günzinger R, Kemkes BM, Bleese N, Sosnowski A, Maïza D, Coto EO, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R (2002) Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 11:529–536PubMed Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Günzinger R, Kemkes BM, Bleese N, Sosnowski A, Maïza D, Coto EO, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R (2002) Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 11:529–536PubMed
7.
go back to reference Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, Nonogi H, Corin WJ, Krayenbuehl HP (1988) Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 77:1345–1355CrossRefPubMed Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, Nonogi H, Corin WJ, Krayenbuehl HP (1988) Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 77:1345–1355CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurnik PB, Innerfield M, Wachspress JD, Eldredge WJ, Waxman HL (1990) Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured by ultrafast computed tomography. Am Heart J 120:919–927CrossRefPubMed Kurnik PB, Innerfield M, Wachspress JD, Eldredge WJ, Waxman HL (1990) Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured by ultrafast computed tomography. Am Heart J 120:919–927CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG (2006) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:1036–1044CrossRefPubMed Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG (2006) Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:1036–1044CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fuster RG, Montero Argudo JA, Albarova OG, Sos FH, López SC, Codoñer MB, Buendía Miñano JA, Albarran IR (2005) Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:441–449CrossRefPubMed Fuster RG, Montero Argudo JA, Albarova OG, Sos FH, López SC, Codoñer MB, Buendía Miñano JA, Albarran IR (2005) Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:441–449CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gelsomino S, Lucà F, Parise O, Lorusso R, Rao CM, Vizzardi E, Gensini GF, Maessen JG (2013) Longitudinal strain predicts left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function. Heart Vessels 28:775–784CrossRefPubMed Gelsomino S, Lucà F, Parise O, Lorusso R, Rao CM, Vizzardi E, Gensini GF, Maessen JG (2013) Longitudinal strain predicts left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function. Heart Vessels 28:775–784CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Takami Y, Tajima K (2015) Impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism on ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in hemodialysis-dependent patients. Heart Vessels 30:510–515CrossRefPubMed Takami Y, Tajima K (2015) Impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism on ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in hemodialysis-dependent patients. Heart Vessels 30:510–515CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lund O, Pilegaard HK, Magnussen K, Knudsen MA, Nielsen TT, Albrechtsen OK (1990) Long-term prosthesis-related and sudden cardiac-related complications after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 50:396–406CrossRef Lund O, Pilegaard HK, Magnussen K, Knudsen MA, Nielsen TT, Albrechtsen OK (1990) Long-term prosthesis-related and sudden cardiac-related complications after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 50:396–406CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Taylor PC, Goormastic M, Stewart RW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Loop FD (1989) Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 97:675–694PubMed Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Taylor PC, Goormastic M, Stewart RW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Loop FD (1989) Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 97:675–694PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ali A, Patel A, Ali Z, Abu-Omar Y, Saeed A, Athanasiou T, Pepper J (2011) Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Sur 142:285–291CrossRef Ali A, Patel A, Ali Z, Abu-Omar Y, Saeed A, Athanasiou T, Pepper J (2011) Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Sur 142:285–291CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Satoh S, Omura S, Inoue H, Ejima E, Shimozono K, Hayashi M, Mori T, Takenaka K, Kawamura N, Numaguchi K, Mori E, Asoh A, Nakamura T, Hiyamuta K (2014) Gender differences in factors influencing electrocardiographic findings of left ventricular hypertrophy in severe aortic stenosis. Heart Vessels 29:659–666CrossRefPubMed Satoh S, Omura S, Inoue H, Ejima E, Shimozono K, Hayashi M, Mori T, Takenaka K, Kawamura N, Numaguchi K, Mori E, Asoh A, Nakamura T, Hiyamuta K (2014) Gender differences in factors influencing electrocardiographic findings of left ventricular hypertrophy in severe aortic stenosis. Heart Vessels 29:659–666CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ehara S, Hasegawa T, Matsumoto K, Otsuka K, Yamazaki T, Iguchi T, Izumi Y, Shimada K, Yoshiyama M (2014) The strain pattern, and not Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic voltage criteria, is independently associated with anatomic left ventricular hypertrophy. Heart Vessels 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed Ehara S, Hasegawa T, Matsumoto K, Otsuka K, Yamazaki T, Iguchi T, Izumi Y, Shimada K, Yoshiyama M (2014) The strain pattern, and not Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic voltage criteria, is independently associated with anatomic left ventricular hypertrophy. Heart Vessels 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, Di Terlizzi M, Yacoub MH, Sheridan DJ, Pennell DJ (2003) Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:59–65CrossRefPubMed Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, Di Terlizzi M, Yacoub MH, Sheridan DJ, Pennell DJ (2003) Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:59–65CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tarantini G, Buja P, Scognamiglio R, Razzolini R, Gerosa G, Isabella G, Ramondo A, Iliceto S (2003) Aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: determinants of cardiac mortality and ventricular function recovery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:879–885CrossRef Tarantini G, Buja P, Scognamiglio R, Razzolini R, Gerosa G, Isabella G, Ramondo A, Iliceto S (2003) Aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: determinants of cardiac mortality and ventricular function recovery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:879–885CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ding WH, Lam YY, Kaya MG, Li W, Chung R, Pepper JR, Henein MY (2008) Echocardiographic predictors of left ventricular functional recovery following valve replacement surgery for severe aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 128:178–184CrossRefPubMed Ding WH, Lam YY, Kaya MG, Li W, Chung R, Pepper JR, Henein MY (2008) Echocardiographic predictors of left ventricular functional recovery following valve replacement surgery for severe aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 128:178–184CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement
Authors
Sayuri Yamabe
Yoshihiro Dohi
Akifumi Higashi
Hiroki Kinoshita
Yoshiharu Sada
Takayuki Hidaka
Satoshi Kurisu
Nobuo Shiode
Yasuki Kihara
HERO (Hiroshima Heart Study Group) Investigators
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Heart and Vessels / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0910-8327
Electronic ISSN: 1615-2573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0761-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Heart and Vessels 9/2016 Go to the issue