Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2023

Open Access 15-09-2023 | Ultrasound | Topic Paper

Assessing cancer risk in the anterior part of the prostate using micro-ultrasound: validation of a novel distinct protocol

Authors: Sandy Schaer, Arnas Rakauskas, Julien Dagher, Stefano La Rosa, Jake Pensa, Wayne Brisbane, Leonard Marks, Adam Kinnaird, Robert Abouassaly, Eric Klein, Lewis Thomas, Jean-Yves Meuwly, Pamela Parker, Beat Roth, Massimo Valerio

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and validate a micro-ultrasound risk score that predicts the likelihood of significant prostate cancer in the anterior zone.

Methods

Patients were enrolled from three expert institutions familiar with micro-ultrasound. The study was conducted in two phases. First, the PRI-MUS anterior score was developed by assessing selected prostate videos from patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Second, seven urology readers with varying levels of experience in micro-ultrasound examination evaluated prostate loops according to the PRI-MUS anterior score. Each reader watched the videos and recorded the likelihood of the presence of significant cancer in the anterior part of the prostate in a three-point scale. The coherence among the readers was calculated using the Fleiss kappa and the Cronbach alpha.

Results

A total of 102 selected prostate scans were used to develop the risk assessment for anterior zone cancer in the prostate. The score comprised three categories: likely, equivocal, and unlikely. The median (IQR) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the seven readers were 72% (68–84), 68% (64–84), 75% (72–81), and 73% (71–80), respectively. The mean SD ROC AUC was 0.75 ± 2%, while the Fleiss kappa and the Cronbach alpha were 0.179 and 0.56, respectively.

Conclusion

Micro-ultrasound can detect cancerous lesions in the anterior part of the prostate. When combined with the PRI-MUS protocol to assess the peripheral part, it enables an assessment of the entire prostate gland. Pending external validation, the PRI-MUS anterior score developed in this study might be implemented in clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Månsson M et al (2019) A 16-yr follow-up of the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 76:43–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Månsson M et al (2019) A 16-yr follow-up of the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 76:43–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRefPubMed Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pavlovich CP, Cornish TC, Mullins JK et al (2014) High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32:34.e27–32CrossRefPubMed Pavlovich CP, Cornish TC, Mullins JK et al (2014) High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32:34.e27–32CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ghai S, Eure G, Fradet V, Hyndman ME, McGrath T, Wodlinger B, Pavlovich CP (2016) Assessing cancer risk on novel 29 MHz micro-ultrasound images of the prostate: creation of the micro-ultrasound protocol for prostate risk identification. J Urol 196:562–569CrossRefPubMed Ghai S, Eure G, Fradet V, Hyndman ME, McGrath T, Wodlinger B, Pavlovich CP (2016) Assessing cancer risk on novel 29 MHz micro-ultrasound images of the prostate: creation of the micro-ultrasound protocol for prostate risk identification. J Urol 196:562–569CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hofbauer SL, Luger F, Harland N et al (2022) A non-inferiority comparative analysis of micro-ultrasonography and MRI-targeted biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int 129:648–654CrossRefPubMed Hofbauer SL, Luger F, Harland N et al (2022) A non-inferiority comparative analysis of micro-ultrasonography and MRI-targeted biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int 129:648–654CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Martel P, Rakauskas A, Dagher J, La Rosa S, Meuwly JY, Roth B, Valerio M (2022) The benefit of adopting Microultrasound in the prostate cancer imaging pathway: a lesion-by-lesion analysis: biopsies prostatiques guidée par micro-échographie, quel bénéfice ? Une analyse lésion par lésion. Progr En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol. 32:626–2632 Martel P, Rakauskas A, Dagher J, La Rosa S, Meuwly JY, Roth B, Valerio M (2022) The benefit of adopting Microultrasound in the prostate cancer imaging pathway: a lesion-by-lesion analysis: biopsies prostatiques guidée par micro-échographie, quel bénéfice ? Une analyse lésion par lésion. Progr En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol. 32:626–2632
8.
go back to reference Hassanzadeh E, Glazer DI, Dunne RM, Fennessy FM, Harisinghani MG, Tempany CM (2017) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol N Y 42:278–289CrossRef Hassanzadeh E, Glazer DI, Dunne RM, Fennessy FM, Harisinghani MG, Tempany CM (2017) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol N Y 42:278–289CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rakauskas A, Peters M, Martel P, van Rossum PSN, Rosa SL, Meuwly J-Y, Roth B, Valerio M (2023) Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study. PLOS ONE 18:e0280262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rakauskas A, Peters M, Martel P, van Rossum PSN, Rosa SL, Meuwly J-Y, Roth B, Valerio M (2023) Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study. PLOS ONE 18:e0280262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Klotz L, Lughezzani G, Maffei D et al (2021) Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a multicenter, prospective analysis. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can 15:E11–E16 Klotz L, Lughezzani G, Maffei D et al (2021) Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a multicenter, prospective analysis. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can 15:E11–E16
11.
go back to reference Lughezzani G, Saita A, Lazzeri M, Paciotti M, Maffei D, Lista G, Hurle R, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Casale P (2019) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2:329–332CrossRefPubMed Lughezzani G, Saita A, Lazzeri M, Paciotti M, Maffei D, Lista G, Hurle R, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Casale P (2019) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2:329–332CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ et al (2020) The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 44:87–99CrossRef van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ et al (2020) The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 44:87–99CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, Van Der Graaf M, Heerschap A, Sedelaar JP, Aarnink RG, De La Rosette JJ (2000) Prostate cancer staging using imaging. BJU Int 86:123–134CrossRefPubMed Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, Van Der Graaf M, Heerschap A, Sedelaar JP, Aarnink RG, De La Rosette JJ (2000) Prostate cancer staging using imaging. BJU Int 86:123–134CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Postema A, Mischi M, de la Rosette J, Wijkstra H (2015) Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 33:1651–1659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Postema A, Mischi M, de la Rosette J, Wijkstra H (2015) Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 33:1651–1659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Grey ADR, Scott R, Shah B et al (2022) Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study. Lancet Oncol 23:428–438CrossRefPubMed Grey ADR, Scott R, Shah B et al (2022) Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study. Lancet Oncol 23:428–438CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S et al (2019) Multiparametric ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization: correlation of B-mode, shear wave elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 202:1166–1173CrossRefPubMed Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S et al (2019) Multiparametric ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization: correlation of B-mode, shear wave elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 202:1166–1173CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sountoulides P, Pyrgidis N, Polyzos SA, Mykoniatis I, Asouhidou E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Anastasiadis A, Lusuardi L, Hatzichristou D (2021) Micro-ultrasound-guided vs multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 205:1254–1262CrossRefPubMed Sountoulides P, Pyrgidis N, Polyzos SA, Mykoniatis I, Asouhidou E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Anastasiadis A, Lusuardi L, Hatzichristou D (2021) Micro-ultrasound-guided vs multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 205:1254–1262CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ghai S, Perlis N, Atallah C et al (2022) Comparison of micro-US and multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men. Radiology 305:390–398CrossRefPubMed Ghai S, Perlis N, Atallah C et al (2022) Comparison of micro-US and multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men. Radiology 305:390–398CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Klotz L, Andriole G, Cash H et al (2021) Optimization of prostate biopsy—micro-ultrasound versus MRI (OPTIMUM): a 3-arm randomized controlled trial evaluating the role of 29 MHz micro-ultrasound in guiding prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials. 112:106618CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Andriole G, Cash H et al (2021) Optimization of prostate biopsy—micro-ultrasound versus MRI (OPTIMUM): a 3-arm randomized controlled trial evaluating the role of 29 MHz micro-ultrasound in guiding prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials. 112:106618CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing cancer risk in the anterior part of the prostate using micro-ultrasound: validation of a novel distinct protocol
Authors
Sandy Schaer
Arnas Rakauskas
Julien Dagher
Stefano La Rosa
Jake Pensa
Wayne Brisbane
Leonard Marks
Adam Kinnaird
Robert Abouassaly
Eric Klein
Lewis Thomas
Jean-Yves Meuwly
Pamela Parker
Beat Roth
Massimo Valerio
Publication date
15-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04591-w

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

World Journal of Urology 11/2023 Go to the issue