Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy

Authors: André P. Nicklas, David Schilling, Markus J. Bader, Thomas R. W. Herrmann, Udo Nagele, Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous stone removal increasingly plays an important role among the different approaches of interventional stone therapy, particularly since the development of miniaturized instruments is resulting in lower morbidity for the patients. One major drawback of smaller instruments is the increased difficulty of stone retrieval after disintegration due to the reduced tract diameter. This results in longer operation time and the need of additional tools such as disposable retrieval baskets. One of the key factors in the development of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP) was the design of an Amplatz sheath which provides a built-in vacuum cleaner effect for stone retrieval.

Methods

A series of flow analyses with the gauges and shapes of the most commonly used nephroscopes and sheaths in percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy was performed by computational fluid dynamics. Flow velocity and direction in front of the nephroscope were computed and visualized by the software.

Results

In our study, the vacuum cleaner effect developed exclusively when a round-shaped nephroscope was used (Nagele Miniature Nephroscope System, Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG) and depended on the relation between nephroscope diameter and inner sheath diameter. The strongest effect was observed with a 12 F nephroscope and an inner sheath diameter of 15 F. It did not develop when an oval- or crescent-shaped nephroscope was used. In front of the distal end of the round-shaped nephroscope, a slipstream develops, induced by the excursive change of width of the fluid flow on the outlet of the flushing canal. This allows the adhesion of a stone fragment in the eddy while the fluid flow is circulating around the stone.

Conclusion

This study illustrates and explains the vacuum cleaner effect which has been detected in the development of the Nagele Miniature Nephroscope System used in MIP. It combines the reduced morbidity of smaller kidney puncture diameters with the benefit of quick and complete stone removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125(4):463–466PubMed Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125(4):463–466PubMed
2.
go back to reference Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, McGough PF, Barrett DM (1982) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones. Preliminary report. Mayo Clin Proc 57(10):615–619PubMed Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, McGough PF, Barrett DM (1982) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones. Preliminary report. Mayo Clin Proc 57(10):615–619PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582CrossRefPubMed Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chan DY, Jarrett TW (2000) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 14(3):269–272 Discussion 272–263CrossRefPubMed Chan DY, Jarrett TW (2000) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 14(3):269–272 Discussion 272–263CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40(6):619–624CrossRefPubMed Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40(6):619–624CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sung YM, Choo SW, Jeon SS, Shin SW, Park KB, Do YS (2006) The “mini-perc” technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a 14-Fr peel-away sheath: 3-year results in 72 patients. Korean J Radiol 7(1):50–56PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sung YM, Choo SW, Jeon SS, Shin SW, Park KB, Do YS (2006) The “mini-perc” technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a 14-Fr peel-away sheath: 3-year results in 72 patients. Korean J Radiol 7(1):50–56PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC (2001) Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58(3):345–350CrossRefPubMed Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC (2001) Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58(3):345–350CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD, Kuczyk MA, Walcher U, Hennenlotter J, Stenzl A, Anastasiadis AG (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21(9):1113–1116. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0230 CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD, Kuczyk MA, Walcher U, Hennenlotter J, Stenzl A, Anastasiadis AG (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21(9):1113–1116. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2006.​0230 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Schilling DA, Sievert KD, Kuczyk MA, Stenzl A (2007) Introducing a new sealant applicator for easy, safe, and quick closure of a mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy access tract. J Endourol 21(4):393–396. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0244 CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Schilling DA, Sievert KD, Kuczyk MA, Stenzl A (2007) Introducing a new sealant applicator for easy, safe, and quick closure of a mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy access tract. J Endourol 21(4):393–396. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2006.​0244 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Corvin S, Seibold J, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2006) Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 68(3):489–493. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.081 Discussion 493–484CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Corvin S, Seibold J, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2006) Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 68(3):489–493. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2006.​03.​081 Discussion 493–484CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(9):1066, 1068–1073. doi:10.1007/s00120-008-1814-2 CrossRef Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(9):1066, 1068–1073. doi:10.​1007/​s00120-008-1814-2 CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gay RR (2006) Power plant performance monitoring. Tech Books International, New Delhi Gay RR (2006) Power plant performance monitoring. Tech Books International, New Delhi
18.
go back to reference Amer T, Ahmed K, Bultitude M, Khan S, Kumar P, De Rosa A, Khan MS, Hegarty N (2012) Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Urol Int 88(4):373–382. doi:10.1159/000336145 CrossRefPubMed Amer T, Ahmed K, Bultitude M, Khan S, Kumar P, De Rosa A, Khan MS, Hegarty N (2012) Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Urol Int 88(4):373–382. doi:10.​1159/​000336145 CrossRefPubMed
19.
21.
25.
go back to reference Anjum MI, Palmer JH (1996) Stone matrix clearance from the pelvicalyceal system using a bottle-brush. Br J Urol 78(3):460–463CrossRefPubMed Anjum MI, Palmer JH (1996) Stone matrix clearance from the pelvicalyceal system using a bottle-brush. Br J Urol 78(3):460–463CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lezrek M, Qarro A, Bazine K, Najoui M, Asseban M, Benjelloun M, el Kasmaoui H, Beddouch A, Alami M (2010) A vacuum cleaner for the pelvicalyceal system during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 24(6):949–952. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0444 CrossRefPubMed Lezrek M, Qarro A, Bazine K, Najoui M, Asseban M, Benjelloun M, el Kasmaoui H, Beddouch A, Alami M (2010) A vacuum cleaner for the pelvicalyceal system during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 24(6):949–952. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2009.​0444 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy
Authors
André P. Nicklas
David Schilling
Markus J. Bader
Thomas R. W. Herrmann
Udo Nagele
Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1541-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

World Journal of Urology 11/2015 Go to the issue