Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Flow matters 2: How to improve irrigation flow in small-calibre percutaneous procedures—the purging effect

Authors: Udo Nagele, Ute Walcher, Markus Bader, Thomas Herrmann, Stephan Kruck, David Schilling

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of high-pressure irrigation inflow combined with simultaneous sensor-controlled suction could improve irrigation turnover without leading to high peak intrarenal pressure in small-calibre percutaneous instruments (SCPI).

M + M

A MIP XS sheath (9.5 Fr. outer diameter and 8.5 Fr. inner diameter) and a 7.5-Fr. nephroscope (3-Fr. irrigation channel; MIP XS by Nagele, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was inserted into the collecting system of a non-perfused cadaveric porcine kidney, an 8-Fr. mono-J catheter was introduced through the ureter. Irrigation was performed using a pressure-controlled, combined irrigation/suction pump (Uromat E.A.S.I., Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) in either single-flow or continuous-flow (=combination of irrigation and suction) mode. Intrarenal pressure was measured and irrigation fluid turnover was measured by a cystometry catheter inserted trans-parenchymally into the renal pelvis. Pressure changes were recorded by a urodynamic workstation.

Results

Applying pressure-controlled suction, irrigation fluid turnover could be increased by 5 % at an inflow pressure of 75 mmHg (80–84 ml/min) and 15 % at an inflow pressure of 110 mmHg (196–110 ml/min). Suction decreased the intrarenal pressure by 14 % at 75 mmHg (19–14.5 cm H2O) and 28 % at 110 mmHg inflow pressure (37–26.5 cm H2O).

Conclusion

Although combination of pressure irrigation with sensor-controlled suction increases irrigation flow in SCPI, the intrarenal pressure could be reduced with combined suction via a transurethral mono-J catheter. This irrigation method in percutaneous surgery is called purging effect.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bach T, Netsch C, TR Herrmann et al (2011) Objective assessment of working tool impact on irrigation flow and visibility in flexible ureterorenoscopes. J Endourol 25:1125–1129CrossRefPubMed Bach T, Netsch C, TR Herrmann et al (2011) Objective assessment of working tool impact on irrigation flow and visibility in flexible ureterorenoscopes. J Endourol 25:1125–1129CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M et al (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 59:1054–1059CrossRefPubMed Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M et al (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 59:1054–1059CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M (2014) PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World J Urol [Epub ahead of print] Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M (2014) PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World J Urol [Epub ahead of print]
4.
go back to reference Guo HQ, Shi HL, Li XG et al (2008) Relationship between the intrapelvic perfusion pressure in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and postoperative recovery. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 46:52–54PubMed Guo HQ, Shi HL, Li XG et al (2008) Relationship between the intrapelvic perfusion pressure in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and postoperative recovery. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 46:52–54PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789–793CrossRefPubMed Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM (2001) Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789–793CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Gakis G et al (2011) Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation. Urol Res 39:483–486CrossRefPubMed Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Gakis G et al (2011) Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation. Urol Res 39:483–486CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722CrossRefPubMed Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Stenzl A et al (2012) Radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder for invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of long-term oncological, functional, and quality of life results. World J Urol 30:725–732CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Stenzl A et al (2012) Radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder for invasive bladder cancer: a critical analysis of long-term oncological, functional, and quality of life results. World J Urol 30:725–732CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD et al (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21:1113–1116CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD et al (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21:1113–1116CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189:580–584CrossRefPubMed Traxer O, Thomas A (2013) Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 189:580–584CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sa Troxel, Rk Low (2002) Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol 168:1348–1351CrossRef Sa Troxel, Rk Low (2002) Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol 168:1348–1351CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NPN et al (2011) Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 25:933–939CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NPN et al (2011) Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 25:933–939CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K et al (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22:2147–2151CrossRefPubMed Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K et al (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22:2147–2151CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Flow matters 2: How to improve irrigation flow in small-calibre percutaneous procedures—the purging effect
Authors
Udo Nagele
Ute Walcher
Markus Bader
Thomas Herrmann
Stephan Kruck
David Schilling
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1486-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

World Journal of Urology 10/2015 Go to the issue