Skip to main content
Log in

Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes has improved diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures. Despite technical improvement irrigation flow and quality of vision is often unsatisfactory. This study describes inter-manufactural differences in the latest available flexible ureteroscopes in terms of irrigation flow in correlation to different deflection angles and the use of 1.9 Fr. stone baskets. Irrigation flow measurements were performed in five new-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes with 3.6 Fr. working channels: Wolf (Uretero-Renoscope 270°), Storz (Flex-X² and Flex-Xc), ACMI (DUR-D) and Olympus (URF Type P5) in 0°, 90° and 180° deflection. All measurements were carried out five times with an empty working channel as well as with inserted 1.9 Fr. stone baskets. Mean flow rates with empty instruments (SD) counted 50 ml/min (0.8), 50 (1.0), 48 (1.7), 48 (1.6) and 44 (0.7) for ACMI, Wolf, Storz (FlexX² and Flex-Xc), and Olympus, respectively. Stone baskets significantly reduced irrigation flows in all tested ureteroscopes (p < 0.05). In channels with inserted baskets, the highest flow rates were measured for ACMI and Wolf with 12 ml/min (0.7) each. The lowest reduction of flow rate was detected in the ACMI and the Wolf ureteroscope (76.0%, 38 ml/min each). Measurements after flexion showed no significant differences between the ureteroscopes. Latest generation of flexible ureteroscopes offer various new product developments, including excellent deflection capacities. This study showed inter-manufactural differences in terms of irrigation flow rates with either empty or occupied working channels resulting in significant alterations in endoscopic view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdelshehid C, Ahlering MT, Chou D, Park HK, Basillote J, Lee D, Kim I, Eichel L, Protsenko D, Wong B, McDougall E, Clayman RV (2005) Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics. J Urol 173:2017–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andonian S, Okeke Z, Smith AD (2008) Digital ureteroscopy: the next step. J Endourol 22:603–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Honeck P, Nagele U, Michel MS (2008) Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy. Urologe A 47:587–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchell S, Havranek E, Patel A (2008) First digital flexible ureterorenoscope: initial experience. J Endourol 22:47–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, Schwartz S, Vanlangendock R, Skenazy J, Landman J (2006) Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 176:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagele U, Horstmann M, Hennenlotter J, Walcher U, Kuczyk MA, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Anastasiadis AG (2006) Size does matter: 1.5 Fr. stone baskets almost double irrigation flow during flexible ureteroscopy compared to 1.9 Fr. stone baskets. Urol Res 34:389–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith RD, Patel A (2007) Impact of flexible ureterorenoscopy in current management of nephrolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 17:114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Turk C, Knoll T, Kohrmann KU (2008) New guidelines for urinary stone treatment: controversy or development? Urologe A 47:591–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Nagele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kruck, S., Anastasiadis, A.G., Gakis, G. et al. Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation. Urol Res 39, 483–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0373-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0373-y

Keywords

Navigation