Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Computed Tomography | Interventional

Percutaneous vertebroplasty of the cervical spine performed via a posterior trans-pedicular approach

Authors: Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Pierre de Marini, Pierre Auloge, Pierre Alexis Autreausseau, Guillaume Koch, Danoob Dalili, Pramod Rao, Julien Garnon, Afshin Gangi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) of the cervical spine has been traditionally performed with a trans-oral or antero-lateral approach. The posterior trans-pedicular approach (PTPA) has been sporadically reported. Therefore, the aim of this study is to retrospectively assess the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of cervical PV performed with a PTPA.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing PV in cervical levels with PTPA (under general anesthesia and computed tomography [CT] guidance) from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified. The following data were collected: patients’ demographics; indication for PV; vertebral level features; procedure-related variables; and clinical outcomes including complications and pain relief.

Results

Thirty-two patients (18 females, 14 males; mean age 61.1 ± 13.2 years, range 36–88) were included accounting for 36 vertebrae. Three vertebrae (3/36, 8%) were referred due to an underlying traumatic fracture, the remaining (33/36, 92%) due to a painful lytic tumor. Technical success was 97% (35/36 levels). Mean time required to deploy the trocar was 23 ± 11 min (range 7–60). Extra-vertebral asymptomatic cement leakage was observed in 3/35 (9%) vertebral levels. One patient (1/32, 3%) developed an acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema requiring admission in the intensive care unit; another patient (1/32, 3%) developed localized infection to the skin entry site, which was managed conservatively. At 1-month follow-up, the mean pain in the study population was 1.0 ± 1.1 (range 0–4/10) vs 6.2 ± 1.4 (range 4–9/10) at baseline (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Cervical PV performed via a CT-guided PTPA is technically feasible, safe, and results in effective pain relief.

Key Points

• Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a well-established technique for the treatment of benign and malignant compression fractures.
• Common PV approaches used for cervical vertebrae include the trans-oral, antero-lateral, lateral, and sporadically the posterior trans-pedicular approach.
• Retrospective analysis of our 11-year experience with the posterior trans-pedicular approach used for cervical vertebrae proved that such approach was safe and effective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Health Quality Ontario (2016) Vertebral augmentation involving vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for cancer-related vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 16(11):1–202PubMedCentral Health Quality Ontario (2016) Vertebral augmentation involving vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for cancer-related vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 16(11):1–202PubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G et al (2017) CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(3):331–342CrossRef Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G et al (2017) CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(3):331–342CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Anselmetti GC, Marcia S, Saba L et al (2012) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients. Eur J Radiol 81(12):4083–4086CrossRef Anselmetti GC, Marcia S, Saba L et al (2012) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients. Eur J Radiol 81(12):4083–4086CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clarençon F, Fahed R, Cormier E et al (2020) Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review. Eur Radiol 30(3):1571–1583CrossRef Clarençon F, Fahed R, Cormier E et al (2020) Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review. Eur Radiol 30(3):1571–1583CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tong FC, Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Rodts GR, Dion JE (2000) Transoral approach to cervical vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1322–1324 Tong FC, Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Rodts GR, Dion JE (2000) Transoral approach to cervical vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1322–1324
6.
go back to reference Guo WH, Meng MB, You X et al (2012) CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty of the upper cervical spine via a translateral approach. Pain Physician 15(5):E733–E741PubMed Guo WH, Meng MB, You X et al (2012) CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty of the upper cervical spine via a translateral approach. Pain Physician 15(5):E733–E741PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sun HY, Lee JW, Kim KJ, Yeom JS, Kang HS (2009) Percutaneous intervention of the C2 vertebral body using a CT-guided posterolateral approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1703–1705 Sun HY, Lee JW, Kim KJ, Yeom JS, Kang HS (2009) Percutaneous intervention of the C2 vertebral body using a CT-guided posterolateral approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1703–1705
8.
go back to reference Cianfoni A, Distefano D, Chin SH, Varma AK, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G (2012) Percutaneous cement augmentation of a lytic lesion of C1 via posterolateral approach under CT guidance. Spine J 12(6):500–506 Cianfoni A, Distefano D, Chin SH, Varma AK, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G (2012) Percutaneous cement augmentation of a lytic lesion of C1 via posterolateral approach under CT guidance. Spine J 12(6):500–506
9.
go back to reference Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(8):1141–1146 Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(8):1141–1146
10.
go back to reference De la Garza-Ramos R, Benvenutti-Regato M, Caro-Osorio E (2016) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Spine Surg 10:7CrossRef De la Garza-Ramos R, Benvenutti-Regato M, Caro-Osorio E (2016) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Spine Surg 10:7CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bousson V, Guinebert S, Odri G et al (2020) Curved discography needle for percutaneous cervical spine vertebroplasty: a technical note. J Vasc Interv Radiol 31(4):686–689CrossRef Bousson V, Guinebert S, Odri G et al (2020) Curved discography needle for percutaneous cervical spine vertebroplasty: a technical note. J Vasc Interv Radiol 31(4):686–689CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Percutaneous vertebroplasty of the cervical spine performed via a posterior trans-pedicular approach
Authors
Roberto Luigi Cazzato
Pierre de Marini
Pierre Auloge
Pierre Alexis Autreausseau
Guillaume Koch
Danoob Dalili
Pramod Rao
Julien Garnon
Afshin Gangi
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

European Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue