Published in:
01-11-2020 | CT Angiography | Computed Tomography
Impact of machine learning–based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
Authors:
Hong Yan Qiao, Chun Xiang Tang, U. Joseph Schoepf, Christian Tesche, Richard R. Bayer 2nd, Dante A Giovagnoli, H. Todd Hudson Jr, Chang Sheng Zhou, Jing Yan, Meng Jie Lu, Fan Zhou, Guang Ming Lu, Jian Wei Jiang, Long Jiang Zhang
Published in:
European Radiology
|
Issue 11/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
Objectives
This study investigated the impact of machine learning (ML)–based fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for therapeutic decision-making and patient outcome in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
One thousand one hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with stable chest pain who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) followed ICA within 90 days between January 2007 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Medical records were reviewed for the endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). FFRCT values were calculated using an artificial intelligence (AI) ML platform. Disagreements between hemodynamic significant stenosis via FFRCT and severe stenosis on qualitative CCTA and ICA were also evaluated.
Results
After FFRCT results were revealed, a change in the proposed treatment regimen chosen based on ICA results was seen in 167 patients (14.9%). Over a median follow-up time of 26 months (4–48 months), FFRCT ≤ 0.80 was associated with MACE (HR, 6.84 (95% CI, 3.57 to 13.11); p < 0.001), with superior prognostic value compared to severe stenosis on ICA (HR, 1.84 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.73), p = 0.002) and CCTA (HR, 1.47 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.14, p = 0.045). Reserving ICA and revascularization for vessels with positive FFRCT could have reduced the rate of ICA by 54.5% and lead to 4.4% fewer percutaneous interventions.
Conclusions
This study indicated ML-based FFRCT had superior prognostic value when compared to severe anatomic stenosis on CCTA and adding FFRCT may direct therapeutic decision-making with the potential to improve efficiency of ICA.
Key Points
• ML-based FFR
CT
shows superior outcome prediction value when compared to severe anatomic stenosis on CCTA.
• FFR
CT
noninvasively informs therapeutic decision-making with potential to change diagnostic workflows and enhance efficiencies in patients with suspected CAD.
• Reserving ICA and revascularization for vessels with positive FFR
CT
may reduce the normalcy rate of ICA and improve its efficiency.