Top

European Radiology

Published in:

01-08-2018 | Oncology

The changing face of cancer diagnosis: From computational image analysis to systems biology

Author: Fabian Kiessling

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2018

ᅟ

Key Points

• Radiomics and radiogenomics will merge radiology, nuclear medicine, pathology and laboratory medicine.

• Automation of image data analysis will change the daily routine work.

• Image-guided therapy and handling complex radiogenomic data will play a major role.

van Ginneken B (2017) Fifty years of computer analysis in chest imaging: rule-based, machine learning, deep learning. Radiol Phys Technol 10:23–32CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

van Ginneken B, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M (2011) Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic. Radiology 261:719–732CrossRefPubMed

Bhargava R, Madabhushi A (2016) Emerging themes in image informatics and molecular analysis for digital pathology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 18:387–412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Morra L, Sacchetto D, Durando M et al (2015) Breast cancer: computer-aided detection with digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiology 277:56–63CrossRefPubMed

Jacobs C, van Rikxoort EM, Murphy K, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, van Ginneken B (2016) Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules: a comparative study using the public LIDC/IDRI database. Eur Radiol 26:2139–2147CrossRefPubMed

Kim H, Park CM, Hwang EJ, Ahn SY, Goo JM (2017) Pulmonary subsolid nodules: value of semi-automatic measurement in diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic reproducibility and nodule classification agreement. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5171-7

Randal E, Jaime G, Mitchell T (2015) From Data to Knowledge to Action: Enabling Advanced Intelligence and Decision-Making for America’s Security. Computing Community Consortium Version 6: July 28, 20101.

Nunn S (2001) Cities, Space, and the New World of Urban Law Enforcement Technologies. J Urban Affairs 23:259–278CrossRef

Borrebaeck CA (2017) Precision diagnostics: moving towards protein biomarker signatures of clinical utility in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17:199–204CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gerdtsson AS, Malats N, Säll A et al (2015) A multicenter trial defining a serum protein signature associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/587250

11.

Sauter ER (2017) Reliable Biomarkers to Identify New and Recurrent Cancer. Eur J Breast Health 13:162–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Shah R, Jones E, Vidart V, Kuppen PJ, Conti JA, Francis NK (2014) Biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer and polyps: systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:1712–1728CrossRefPubMed

13.

Han X, Wang J, Sun Y (2017) Circulating Tumor DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 15:59–72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Murphy IG, Mitchell EL, Raso-Barnett L, Godfrey AL, Godfrey EM (2017) Imaging features of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Clin Radiol 72:801–809CrossRefPubMed

15.

Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141

16.

Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Incoronato M, Aiello M, Infante T et al (2017) Radiogenomic Analysis of Oncological Data: A Technical Survey. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040805

18.

Hood L, Heath JR, Phelps ME, Lin B (2004) Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine. Science 306:640–643CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kitano H (2002) Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295:1662–1664CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kreeger PK, Lauffenburger DA (2010) Cancer systems biology: a network modeling perspective. Carcinogenesis 31:2–8CrossRefPubMed

21.

Michor F, Beal K (2015) Improving Cancer Treatment via Mathematical Modeling: Surmounting the Challenges Is Worth the Effort. Cell 163:1059–1063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Haeno H, Gonen M, Davis MB, Herman JM, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Michor F (2012) Computational modeling of pancreatic cancer reveals kinetics of metastasis suggesting optimum treatment strategies. Cell 148:362–375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Patel JN (2016) Cancer pharmacogenomics, challenges in implementation, and patient-focused perspectives. Pharmgenomics. Pers Med 9:65–77

24.

Zieba A, Grannas K, Söderberg O, Gullberg M, Nilsson M, Landegren U (2012) Molecular tools for companion diagnostics. N Biotechnol 29:634–640CrossRefPubMed

Title: The changing face of cancer diagnosis: From computational image analysis to systems biology
Author: Fabian Kiessling
Publication date: 01-08-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5347-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The changing face of cancer diagnosis: From computational image analysis to systems biology

ᅟ

Key Points

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

ᅟ

Key Points

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas

Correction to: A predictive model for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after gamma knife radiosurgery based on radiomic features from MR images

18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI for preoperative lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer patients

Imaging complex ventral hernias, their surgical repair, and their complications

How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes

Pulmonary arterial stiffening in COPD and its implications for right ventricular remodelling