Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Breast

Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer

Authors: Amro Masarwah, Päivi Auvinen, Mazen Sudah, Suvi Rautiainen, Anna Sutela, Outi Pelkonen, Sanna Oikari, Veli-Matti Kosma, Ritva Vanninen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the prognostic value of mammographic breast density (MBD) and mammographic features and their relationship with established prognostic factors in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Methods

Mammographic characteristics of 270 patients were analyzed. MBD was classified according to percentile density (<5 %, 5-10 %, 10-25 %, 25-50 %, 50-75 %, >75 %) and further categorized into very low density (VLD; <10 %), low density (LOD; <25 %) and mixed density (MID; >25 %). Mammographic features were compared with established prognostic factors and patient outcomes while correcting for possible confounders.

Results

MBD was inversely associated with tumour grade (p = 0.019). Patients with LOD breasts had worse prognoses compared to those with MID breasts (disease-free survival 74.7 % vs. 84.8 %, p = 0.048; overall survival 75.3 % vs. 90.2 %, p = 0.003). Patients with VLD breasts showed the strongest significance compared to the remaining patients, even after adjusting for age, body mass index, and menopausal status. No other mammographic feature was prognostically significant. In Cox regression analysis, VLD proved to be an independent, poor prognostic feature (hazard ratio = 3.275; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, very low MBD proved to be an independent prognostic feature, associated with higher tumour grade and predicted worse survival even after correcting for possible confounders.

Key Points

Percentile mammographic breast density was associated with patient prognosis.
Very low density proved to be an independent poor prognostic factor.
Only patients with densities <10 % displayed this difference in survival.
Mammographic breast density was inversely associated with histological tumour grade.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Anothaisintawee T, Wiratkapun C, Lerdsitthichai P et al (2013) Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Public Health 25:368–387PubMedCrossRef Anothaisintawee T, Wiratkapun C, Lerdsitthichai P et al (2013) Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Public Health 25:368–387PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schnitt SJ (2010) Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol 23:S60–S64PubMedCrossRef Schnitt SJ (2010) Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol 23:S60–S64PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182PubMedCrossRef Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177–182PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F et al (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207PubMedCentralPubMed Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F et al (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:1133–1144PubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:1133–1144PubMed
8.
go back to reference Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA et al (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587–1598PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA et al (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587–1598PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10:201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10:201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:456–463PubMedCrossRef Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:456–463PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137PubMedCrossRef Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference D'Orsi C, Mendelson E, Ikeda D et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston D'Orsi C, Mendelson E, Ikeda D et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston
14.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169PubMedCrossRef McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al (2012) Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1218–1227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K et al (2012) Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1218–1227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ et al (2007) Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:676–683PubMedCrossRef Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ et al (2007) Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:676–683PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2009) Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 100:1205–1208PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2009) Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 100:1205–1208PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R et al (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10:157–161PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Solomon L, Warren R et al (2000) Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur Radiol 10:157–161PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2001) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer natural history–a case-control study. Acta Oncol 40:461–465PubMedCrossRef Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (2001) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer natural history–a case-control study. Acta Oncol 40:461–465PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA et al (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:872–879PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA et al (2008) Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:872–879PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228PubMedCrossRef Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, Tabar L, Smith RA, Chen HH (2010) Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:1219–1228PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Auvinen P, Tammi R, Kosma VM et al (2013) Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 132:531–539PubMedCrossRef Auvinen P, Tammi R, Kosma VM et al (2013) Increased hyaluronan content and stromal cell CD44 associate with HER2 positivity and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 132:531–539PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24:vi7–vi23PubMedCrossRef Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F et al (2013) Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24:vi7–vi23PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Theriault RL, Carlson RW, Allred C et al (2013) Breast cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:753–760, quiz 761 Theriault RL, Carlson RW, Allred C et al (2013) Breast cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:753–760, quiz 761
29.
go back to reference Murphy RA, Schairer C, Gierach GL et al (2013) Beyond breast cancer: mammographic features and mortality risk in a population of healthy women. PLoS One 8:e78722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Murphy RA, Schairer C, Gierach GL et al (2013) Beyond breast cancer: mammographic features and mortality risk in a population of healthy women. PLoS One 8:e78722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
32.
go back to reference Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA et al (2013) The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 269:887–892PubMedCrossRef Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA et al (2013) The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 269:887–892PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg LU et al (2013) Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 15(3):R48 Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg LU et al (2013) Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 15(3):R48
Metadata
Title
Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer
Authors
Amro Masarwah
Päivi Auvinen
Mazen Sudah
Suvi Rautiainen
Anna Sutela
Outi Pelkonen
Sanna Oikari
Veli-Matti Kosma
Ritva Vanninen
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3626-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

European Radiology 7/2015 Go to the issue