Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Gastrointestinal

The role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating benign from malignant bile duct strictures

Authors: Hyun Jeong Park, Seong Hyun Kim, Kyung Mi Jang, Seo-youn Choi, Soon Jin Lee, Dongil Choi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating benign from malignant bile duct strictures.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with a benign stricture and 42 patients with a malignant stricture who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with DWI were enrolled. Qualitative (signal intensity, dynamic enhancement pattern) and quantitative (wall thickness and length) analyses were performed. Two observers independently reviewed a set of conventional MRI and a combined set of conventional MRI and DWI, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was assessed.

Results

Benign strictures showed isointensity (18.5–70.4 %) and a similar enhancement pattern (22.2 %) to that of normal bile duct more frequently than malignant strictures (0–40.5 % and 0 %) on conventional MRI (P < 0.05). Malignant strictures (90.5–92.9 %) showed hypervascularity on arterial and portal venous phase images more frequently than benign strictures (37.0–70.4 %) (P < 0.01) On DWI, all malignant strictures showed hyperintensity compared with benign cases (70.4 %) (P < 0.001). Malignant strictures were significantly thicker and longer than benign strictures (P < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of both observers improved significantly after additional review of DWI.

Conclusions

Adding DWI to conventional MRI is more helpful for differentiating benign from malignant bile duct strictures than conventional MRI alone.

Key points

• Accurate diagnosis and exclusion of benign strictures of bile duct are important.
• Diffusion-weighted MRI helps to distinguish benign from malignant bile duct strictures.
• DWI plus conventional MRI provides superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional MRI alone.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21–32PubMed Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21–32PubMed
2.
go back to reference Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW et al (2004) Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 233:234–240PubMedCrossRef Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW et al (2004) Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 233:234–240PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Worawattanakul S, Semelka RC, Noone TC, Calvo BF, Kelekis NL, Woosley JT (1998) Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on MR images using current techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 16:993–1003PubMedCrossRef Worawattanakul S, Semelka RC, Noone TC, Calvo BF, Kelekis NL, Woosley JT (1998) Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on MR images using current techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 16:993–1003PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thuluvath PJ, Rai R, Venbrux AC, Yeo CJ (1997) Cholangiocarcinoma: a review. Gastroenterologist 5:306–315PubMed Thuluvath PJ, Rai R, Venbrux AC, Yeo CJ (1997) Cholangiocarcinoma: a review. Gastroenterologist 5:306–315PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Lim HK, Jang KM et al (2001) Radiologic spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: emphasis on unusual manifestations and differential diagnoses. Radiographics 21:97–116CrossRef Lee WJ, Lim HK, Jang KM et al (2001) Radiologic spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: emphasis on unusual manifestations and differential diagnoses. Radiographics 21:97–116CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim JY, Lee JM, Han JK et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:304–312PubMedCrossRef Kim JY, Lee JM, Han JK et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:304–312PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMedCentralPubMed Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS et al (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822PubMedCrossRef Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS et al (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Zfass AM (1998) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct. Gastroenterologist 6:82–87PubMed Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Zfass AM (1998) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct. Gastroenterologist 6:82–87PubMed
11.
go back to reference Soto JA, Alvarez O, Lopera JE, Munera F, Restrepo JC, Correa G (2000) Biliary obstruction: findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging. Radiographics 20:353–366PubMedCrossRef Soto JA, Alvarez O, Lopera JE, Munera F, Restrepo JC, Correa G (2000) Biliary obstruction: findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging. Radiographics 20:353–366PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R et al (1995) Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 2. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1433–1436PubMedCrossRef Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R et al (1995) Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 2. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1433–1436PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schulte SJ, Baron RL, Teefey SA et al (1990) CT of the extrahepatic bile ducts: wall thickness and contrast enhancement in normal and abnormal ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:79–85PubMedCrossRef Schulte SJ, Baron RL, Teefey SA et al (1990) CT of the extrahepatic bile ducts: wall thickness and contrast enhancement in normal and abnormal ducts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:79–85PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lacomis JM, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Nalesnik MA, Federle MP (1997) Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns. Radiology 203:98–104PubMed Lacomis JM, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Nalesnik MA, Federle MP (1997) Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns. Radiology 203:98–104PubMed
15.
go back to reference Park HS, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) CT Differentiation of cholangiocarcinoma from periductal fibrosis in patients with hepatolithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:445–453PubMedCrossRef Park HS, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) CT Differentiation of cholangiocarcinoma from periductal fibrosis in patients with hepatolithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:445–453PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park MS, Yu JS, Kim KW et al (2001) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: comparison between MR cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Radiology 220:677–682PubMedCrossRef Park MS, Yu JS, Kim KW et al (2001) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: comparison between MR cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Radiology 220:677–682PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Koga A, Ichimiya H, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki K, Nakayama F (1985) Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Possible etiologic significance. Cancer 55:2826–2829PubMedCrossRef Koga A, Ichimiya H, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki K, Nakayama F (1985) Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Possible etiologic significance. Cancer 55:2826–2829PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Park KW, Lim JH, Jang KT, Choi DW (2008) Autoimmune cholangitis mimicking periductal-infiltrating cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 33:334–336PubMedCrossRef Park KW, Lim JH, Jang KT, Choi DW (2008) Autoimmune cholangitis mimicking periductal-infiltrating cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 33:334–336PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chung DT, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2010) Immunoglobulin G4-associated sclerosing cholangitis mimicking cholangiocarcinoma. Hong Kong Med J 16:149–152PubMed Chung DT, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2010) Immunoglobulin G4-associated sclerosing cholangitis mimicking cholangiocarcinoma. Hong Kong Med J 16:149–152PubMed
21.
go back to reference Finkelberg DL, Sahani D, Deshpande V, Brugge WR (2006) Autoimmune pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 355:2670–2676PubMedCrossRef Finkelberg DL, Sahani D, Deshpande V, Brugge WR (2006) Autoimmune pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 355:2670–2676PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nishino T, Toki F, Oyama H et al (2005) Biliary tract involvement in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas 30:76–82PubMed Nishino T, Toki F, Oyama H et al (2005) Biliary tract involvement in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas 30:76–82PubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating benign from malignant bile duct strictures
Authors
Hyun Jeong Park
Seong Hyun Kim
Kyung Mi Jang
Seo-youn Choi
Soon Jin Lee
Dongil Choi
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3097-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

European Radiology 4/2014 Go to the issue