Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Computed Tomography

Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit

Authors: Denis Tack, Andreas Jahnen, Sarah Kohler, Nico Harpes, Viviane De Maertelaer, Carlo Back, Pierre Alain Gevenois

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To report short- and long-term effects of an audit process intended to optimise the radiation dose from multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT).

Methods

A survey of radiation dose from all eight MDCT departments in the state of Luxembourg performed in 2007 served as baseline, and involved the most frequently imaged regions (head, sinus, cervical spine, thorax, abdomen, and lumbar spine). CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose–length product per acquisition (DLP/acq), and DLP per examination (DLP/exa) were recorded, and their mean, median, 25th and 75th percentiles compared. In 2008, an audit conducted in each department helped to optimise doses. In 2009 and 2010, two further surveys evaluated the audit’s impact on the dose delivered.

Results

Between 2007 and 2009, DLP/exa significantly decreased by 32–69 % for all regions (P < 0.001) except the lumbar spine (5 %, P = 0.455). Between 2009 and 2010, DLP/exa significantly decreased by 13–18 % for sinus, cervical and lumbar spine (P ranging from 0.016 to less than 0.001). Between 2007 and 2010, DLP/exa significantly decreased for all regions (18–75 %, P < 0.001). Collective dose decreased by 30 % and the 75th percentile (diagnostic reference level, DRL) by 20–78 %.

Conclusions

The audit process resulted in long-lasting dose reduction, with DRLs reduced by 20–78 %, mean DLP/examination by 18–75 %, and collective dose by 30 %.

Key points

External support through clinical audit may optimise default parameters of routine CT.
Reduction of 75th percentiles used as reference diagnostic levels is 1875 %.
The effect of this audit is sustainable over time.
Dose savings through optimisation can be added to those achievable through CT.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources: 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–553PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources: 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–553PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, McCollough CH, Mettler FA, Pearce MS, Suleiman OH, Thrall JH, Wagner LK (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905PubMedCrossRef Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, McCollough CH, Mettler FA, Pearce MS, Suleiman OH, Thrall JH, Wagner LK (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Commission E (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262EN. Office for Official Publications of the European. Communities, Luxembourg Commission E (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262EN. Office for Official Publications of the European. Communities, Luxembourg
10.
go back to reference Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255:683–686PubMedCrossRef Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255:683–686PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Jessen KA, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G (1998) Reference doses in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:55–59CrossRef Shrimpton PC, Jessen KA, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G (1998) Reference doses in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:55–59CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980PubMedCrossRef Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lo GG, Chan JKF, Lau CW, Geng H, Yu SK (2010) Radiation dose survey: comparison between new-generation computed tomography and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. J HK Coll Radiol 12:107–112 Lo GG, Chan JKF, Lau CW, Geng H, Yu SK (2010) Radiation dose survey: comparison between new-generation computed tomography and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. J HK Coll Radiol 12:107–112
14.
go back to reference Samara ET, Aroua A, Bochud FO, Ott B, Theiler T, Treier R, Trueb PR, Vader JP, Verdun FR (2012) Exposure of the Swiss population by medical x-rays: 2008 review. Health Phys 102:263–270PubMed Samara ET, Aroua A, Bochud FO, Ott B, Theiler T, Treier R, Trueb PR, Vader JP, Verdun FR (2012) Exposure of the Swiss population by medical x-rays: 2008 review. Health Phys 102:263–270PubMed
15.
go back to reference Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR (2010) Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 142:244–254PubMedCrossRef Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR (2010) Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 142:244–254PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stamm G (2012) Collective radiation dose from MDCT: critical review of surveys studies. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–229 Stamm G (2012) Collective radiation dose from MDCT: critical review of surveys studies. In: Tack D, Kalra MK, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from multidetector CT. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209–229
18.
go back to reference Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo—a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. RöFo 174:1570–1576PubMed Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo—a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. RöFo 174:1570–1576PubMed
22.
go back to reference Tack D (2007) Methods and strategies for radiation dose optimization and reduction in MDCT with special focus on the image quality. In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–116CrossRef Tack D (2007) Methods and strategies for radiation dose optimization and reduction in MDCT with special focus on the image quality. In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–116CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jahnen A, Kohler S, Hermen J, Tack D, Back C (2011) Automatic computed tomography patient dose calculation using DICOM header metadata. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147:317–320PubMedCrossRef Jahnen A, Kohler S, Hermen J, Tack D, Back C (2011) Automatic computed tomography patient dose calculation using DICOM header metadata. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147:317–320PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166PubMedCrossRef Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tsapaki V, Aldrich JE, Sharma R, Staniszewska MA, Krisanachinda A, Rehani M, Hufton A, Triantopoulou C, Maniatis PN, Papailiou J, Prokop M (2006) Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT–IAEA-coordinated research project. Radiology 240:828–834PubMedCrossRef Tsapaki V, Aldrich JE, Sharma R, Staniszewska MA, Krisanachinda A, Rehani M, Hufton A, Triantopoulou C, Maniatis PN, Papailiou J, Prokop M (2006) Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CT–IAEA-coordinated research project. Radiology 240:828–834PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2010) Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn’s disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:78–88PubMedCrossRef Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2010) Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn’s disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:78–88PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, Yang SK, Yun SC, Lee SS, Jung GS, Ha HK (2010) Effect of altering automatic exposure control settings and quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:89–100CrossRef Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, Yang SK, Yun SC, Lee SS, Jung GS, Ha HK (2010) Effect of altering automatic exposure control settings and quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:89–100CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific dose estimation for CT: how should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 265:666–668PubMedCrossRef Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific dose estimation for CT: how should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 265:666–668PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sodickson A, Warden GI, Farkas CE, Ikuta I, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, Khorasani R (2012) Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring. Radiology 264:397–405PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sodickson A, Warden GI, Farkas CE, Ikuta I, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, Khorasani R (2012) Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring. Radiology 264:397–405PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit
Authors
Denis Tack
Andreas Jahnen
Sarah Kohler
Nico Harpes
Viviane De Maertelaer
Carlo Back
Pierre Alain Gevenois
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2994-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

European Radiology 1/2014 Go to the issue