Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Editorial

Standardising measurement of tumour vascularity by imaging: recommendations for ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

Authors: Adrian K. Dixon, Fiona J. Gilbert

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This review analyses the need for, and likely impact of, four subsequent papers which discuss the importance of standardisation of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) when assessing tumour vascularity. This is particularly important when measuring the vascular effects of therapeutic agents in oncological research and practice. As imaging inexorably moves from the subjective interpretative art-form of the past into its modern role as a fully fledged objective scientific discipline, it is incumbent on all radiologists to understand the need for strict adherence to perceived best practice when evaluating lesions as part of trials. Indeed trials may only be funded by pharmaceutical companies and other grant-giving bodies if rigorous adherence to imaging protocols and quality assurance is in place.
Key Points
Various imaging methods can now robustly assess tumour vascular support.
US, CT, MRI and PET are increasingly used to assess tumour vascularity.
These techniques have reached technical maturity for use in therapeutic oncological trials.
Consensus guidelines about using these techniques in assessing tumour vascularity are introduced.
Image acquisition protocols and quality assurance must be established for large trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leen EL, Averkiou MA, Arditi M et al (2012) Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) assessment of the vascular effects of novel therapeutics in early stage trials. Eur Radiol 22 Leen EL, Averkiou MA, Arditi M et al (2012) Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) assessment of the vascular effects of novel therapeutics in early stage trials. Eur Radiol 22
2.
go back to reference Miles, KA, Lee T-Y, Goh V et al (2012) Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast enhanced-computed tomography. Eur Radiol 22 Miles, KA, Lee T-Y, Goh V et al (2012) Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast enhanced-computed tomography. Eur Radiol 22
3.
go back to reference Leach MO, Morgan B, Tofts PS et al (2012) Evaluating vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 22 Leach MO, Morgan B, Tofts PS et al (2012) Evaluating vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 22
4.
go back to reference Aboagye EO, Gilbert FJ, Fleming I et al. (2012) Recommendations for measurement of tumour vascularity with positron emission tomography in early phase clinical trials. Eur Radiol 22 Aboagye EO, Gilbert FJ, Fleming I et al. (2012) Recommendations for measurement of tumour vascularity with positron emission tomography in early phase clinical trials. Eur Radiol 22
5.
6.
go back to reference Simon G (1962) Principles of chest X-ray diagnosis, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London Simon G (1962) Principles of chest X-ray diagnosis, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London
7.
go back to reference Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 46:1016–1022PubMedCrossRef Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 46:1016–1022PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Adams JE, Chen SZ, Adams PH, Isherwood I (1982) Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:601–607PubMedCrossRef Adams JE, Chen SZ, Adams PH, Isherwood I (1982) Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:601–607PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miles KA, Hayball M, Dixon AK (1991) Colour perfusion imaging: a new application of computed tomography. Lancet 337:643–645PubMedCrossRef Miles KA, Hayball M, Dixon AK (1991) Colour perfusion imaging: a new application of computed tomography. Lancet 337:643–645PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95–103PubMed Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95–103PubMed
11.
go back to reference Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, MARIBS study group et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778PubMedCrossRef Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, MARIBS study group et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goh V, Shastry M, Engledow A et al (2011) Commercial software upgrades may significantly alter Perfusion CT parameter values in colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 21:744–749PubMedCrossRef Goh V, Shastry M, Engledow A et al (2011) Commercial software upgrades may significantly alter Perfusion CT parameter values in colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 21:744–749PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standardising measurement of tumour vascularity by imaging: recommendations for ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
Authors
Adrian K. Dixon
Fiona J. Gilbert
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2444-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

European Radiology 7/2012 Go to the issue