Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2010

01-04-2010 | Breast

Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy

Authors: Ji Hyun Youk, Eun-Kyung Kim, Min Jung Kim, Jin Young Kwak, Eun Ju Son

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the false-negative rate and to evaluate the clinical, radiologic or histologic features of false-negative results at ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB).

Methods

A total of 3,724 masses from 3,308 women who had undergone US-guided 14-gauge CNB and who had a rebiopsy or at least 2 years’ follow-up were included. The histology of CNB was correlated with the rebiopsy or long-term imaging follow-up. In cases of missed cancer, the time interval between CNB and rebiopsy, the reasons for rebiopsy, and the procedural or lesion characteristics were analysed.

Results

Of 1,706 benign CNBs, 50 additional malignancies were found at excision (false-negative rate, 2.5% of 1,982 with a final diagnosis of malignancy). Of 50 false negatives, 41 were found immediately of which 28 had rebiopsy because of imaging-histological discordance. Regarding the frequency of malignancy according to the reasons for rebiopsy, suspicious imaging finding (24%) showed significantly higher frequency than suspicious clinical findings or request (1%). Regarding the characteristics except invasiveness, no significant differences in false-negative rates were found.

Conclusions

Most false negatives were found immediately and imaging-histological discordance was the most important clue. Careful correlation of clinical, radiological and histological results as well as appropriate follow-up is essential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O’Doherty A, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242:701–707CrossRefPubMed Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O’Doherty A, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242:701–707CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK (2007) Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 45:881–894CrossRefPubMed Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK (2007) Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 45:881–894CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E et al (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 82:1017–1021CrossRefPubMed Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E et al (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 82:1017–1021CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al (1997) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203:151–157PubMed Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al (1997) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203:151–157PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194PubMed Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 212:189–194PubMed
6.
go back to reference Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364PubMed Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364PubMed
7.
go back to reference Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC et al (1996) Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:179–182PubMed Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC et al (1996) Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:179–182PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ et al (2004) Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 11:293–308CrossRefPubMed Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ et al (2004) Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 11:293–308CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:202–207CrossRefPubMed Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:202–207CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52CrossRefPubMed Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L et al (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413CrossRefPubMed Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L et al (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972PubMed Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972PubMed
13.
go back to reference Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF (1998) US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 208:717–723PubMed Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF (1998) US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 208:717–723PubMed
14.
go back to reference Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH (2008) Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 18:1761–1773CrossRefPubMed Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH (2008) Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 18:1761–1773CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V (2003) False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 97:1824–1831CrossRefPubMed Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V (2003) False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 97:1824–1831CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805PubMed Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805PubMed
17.
go back to reference Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA et al (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546CrossRefPubMed Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA et al (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538–2546CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 42:935–946CrossRefPubMed Berg WA (2004) Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 42:935–946CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Burbank F, Parker SH (1998) Methods for analysis of one-step breast biopsy programs. Breast J 4:307–319CrossRef Burbank F, Parker SH (1998) Methods for analysis of one-step breast biopsy programs. Breast J 4:307–319CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K et al (2005) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 92:231–235PubMed Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K et al (2005) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 92:231–235PubMed
21.
go back to reference Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187:507–511PubMed Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187:507–511PubMed
22.
go back to reference Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE et al (2001) The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 20:43–49PubMed Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE et al (2001) The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 20:43–49PubMed
23.
go back to reference Mainiero MB, Koelliker SL, Lazarus E, Schepps B, Lee CH (2002) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: frequency and results of repeat biopsy. J Womens Imaging 4:52–57CrossRef Mainiero MB, Koelliker SL, Lazarus E, Schepps B, Lee CH (2002) Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: frequency and results of repeat biopsy. J Womens Imaging 4:52–57CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6:102–109CrossRefPubMed Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6:102–109CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:347–351PubMed Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:347–351PubMed
26.
go back to reference Bolivar AV, Alonso-Bartolome P, Garcia EO, Ayensa FG (2005) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 46:690–695CrossRefPubMed Bolivar AV, Alonso-Bartolome P, Garcia EO, Ayensa FG (2005) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 46:690–695CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WC (2008) Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:700–707CrossRefPubMed Muttarak M, Lerttumnongtum P, Chaiwun B, Peh WC (2008) Spectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:700–707CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tseng HS, Chen YL, Chen ST et al (2009) The management of papillary lesion of the breast by core needle biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:21–24PubMed Tseng HS, Chen YL, Chen ST et al (2009) The management of papillary lesion of the breast by core needle biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:21–24PubMed
29.
go back to reference Skandarajah AR, Field L, Yuen Larn Mou A et al (2008) Benign papilloma on core biopsy requires surgical excision. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2272–2277CrossRefPubMed Skandarajah AR, Field L, Yuen Larn Mou A et al (2008) Benign papilloma on core biopsy requires surgical excision. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2272–2277CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, Tse G, Ma TK (2006) Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1322–1327CrossRefPubMed Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, Tse G, Ma TK (2006) Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1322–1327CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM, Singer CI, Cangiarella J (2006) Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 238:801–808CrossRefPubMed Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Oken SM, Singer CI, Cangiarella J (2006) Papillary lesions of the breast at percutaneous core-needle biopsy. Radiology 238:801–808CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94CrossRefPubMed Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference de Lucena CE, Dos Santos Junior JL, de Lima Resende CA, do Amaral VF, de Almeida Barra A, Reis JH (2007) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of breast masses: How many cores are necessary to diagnose cancer? J Clin Ultrasound 35:363–366CrossRefPubMed de Lucena CE, Dos Santos Junior JL, de Lima Resende CA, do Amaral VF, de Almeida Barra A, Reis JH (2007) Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of breast masses: How many cores are necessary to diagnose cancer? J Clin Ultrasound 35:363–366CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269–280PubMed Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269–280PubMed
36.
go back to reference Yang WT, Tse GM (2004) Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:101–110PubMed Yang WT, Tse GM (2004) Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:101–110PubMed
37.
go back to reference Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH et al (2008) Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J 49:103–110CrossRefPubMed Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH et al (2008) Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J 49:103–110CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Starvros AT (2004) Malignant solid breast nodules: specific types. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R (eds) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 600–608 Starvros AT (2004) Malignant solid breast nodules: specific types. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R (eds) Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 600–608
39.
go back to reference Alonso-Bartolome P, Vega-Bolivar A, Torres-Tabanera M et al (2004) Sonographically guided 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision: utility and cost study in probably benign lesions. Acta Radiol 45:390–396CrossRefPubMed Alonso-Bartolome P, Vega-Bolivar A, Torres-Tabanera M et al (2004) Sonographically guided 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision: utility and cost study in probably benign lesions. Acta Radiol 45:390–396CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Johnson AT, Henry-Tillman RS, Smith LF et al (2002) Percutaneous excisional breast biopsy. Am J Surg 184:550–554CrossRefPubMed Johnson AT, Henry-Tillman RS, Smith LF et al (2002) Percutaneous excisional breast biopsy. Am J Surg 184:550–554CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Burak WE (2002) Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. Am J Surg 184:332–336CrossRefPubMed Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Burak WE (2002) Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. Am J Surg 184:332–336CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Fine RE, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Boyd BA, Burak WE Jr (2003) Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device. Am J Surg 186:362–367CrossRefPubMed Fine RE, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Boyd BA, Burak WE Jr (2003) Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device. Am J Surg 186:362–367CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy
Authors
Ji Hyun Youk
Eun-Kyung Kim
Min Jung Kim
Jin Young Kwak
Eun Ju Son
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1632-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

European Radiology 4/2010 Go to the issue