Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Computed Tomography

Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering

Authors: Lars Husmann, Bernhard A. Herzog, Nina Burkhard, Fuminari Tatsugami, Ines Valenta, Oliver Gaemperli, Christophe A. Wyss, Ulf Landmesser, Philipp A. Kaufmann

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and characterize the frequency and extent of stair-step artefacts in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering and to identify their determinants. One hundred and forty three consecutive patients (55 women, mean age 57 ± 13 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-triggering. Occurrence of stair-step artefacts in CTCA of the thoracic wall and the coronary arteries was determined and maximum offset was measured. If stair-step artefacts occurred in both cases, a difference between thoracic wall and coronary artery offset of 0.6 mm or greater was attributed to additional motion of the heart. Mean effective radiation dose was 2.1 ± 0.7 mSv (range 1.0–3.5 mSv). Eighty-nine patients (62%) had stair-step artefacts in CTCA of the coronary arteries (mean offset of 1.7 ± 1.1 mm), while only 77 patients had thoracic wall stair-step artefacts (mean offset of 1.0 ± 0.3 mm; significantly different, P < 0.001). Stair-step artefacts in CTCA of the thoracic wall were determined by BMI and weight (P < 0.01), while artefacts in CTCA of the coronary arteries were associated with heart rate variability (P < 0.05). Stair-step artefacts in CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering are determined by (a) motion of the entire patient during table travel, particularly in large patients and (b) by motion of the heart, particularly when heart rates are variable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M et al (2006) Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33:4236–4248PubMedCrossRef Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M et al (2006) Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33:4236–4248PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al (2008) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29:191–197PubMedCrossRef Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al (2008) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29:191–197PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Husmann L, Valenta I, Kaufmann PA (2008) Coronary angiography with low-dose computed tomography at 1.4 mSv. Herz 33:75PubMedCrossRef Husmann L, Valenta I, Kaufmann PA (2008) Coronary angiography with low-dose computed tomography at 1.4 mSv. Herz 33:75PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753PubMedCrossRef Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430PubMedCrossRef Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248:431–437PubMedCrossRef Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248:431–437PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N et al (2008) Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 29(24):3037–3042PubMedCrossRef Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N et al (2008) Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 29(24):3037–3042PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132–1137PubMedCrossRef Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132–1137PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography. JACC 52:1450–1455PubMed Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography. JACC 52:1450–1455PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kaufmann PA (2008) Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1456–1457PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann PA (2008) Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1456–1457PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71–80PubMedCrossRef Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71–80PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Klass O, Jeltsch M, Feuerlein S et al (2008) Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1222-4 Klass O, Jeltsch M, Feuerlein S et al (2008) Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.​1007/​s00330-008-1222-4
13.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA (2008) Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 18:1188–1198PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA (2008) Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 18:1188–1198PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT et al (2007) Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 245:742–750PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT et al (2007) Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 245:742–750PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40PubMed Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kovacs SJ Jr (1985) The duration of the QT interval as a function of heart rate: a derivation based on physical principles and a comparison to measured values. Am Heart J 110:872–878PubMedCrossRef Kovacs SJ Jr (1985) The duration of the QT interval as a function of heart rate: a derivation based on physical principles and a comparison to measured values. Am Heart J 110:872–878PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Husmann L, Leschka S, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: dependency on heart rate implications for CT image reconstruction. Radiology 245:567–576PubMedCrossRef Husmann L, Leschka S, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: dependency on heart rate implications for CT image reconstruction. Radiology 245:567–576PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO et al (2002) Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 12:2670–2678PubMed Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO et al (2002) Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 12:2670–2678PubMed
22.
go back to reference Shapiro MD, Pena AJ, Nichols JH et al (2008) Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 66:37–41PubMedCrossRef Shapiro MD, Pena AJ, Nichols JH et al (2008) Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 66:37–41PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schoenhagen P (2008) Back to the future: coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. Eur Heart J 29:153–154PubMedCrossRef Schoenhagen P (2008) Back to the future: coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. Eur Heart J 29:153–154PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I et al (2008) Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 247:346–355PubMedCrossRef Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I et al (2008) Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 247:346–355PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nakanishi T, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, Sumii K, Gomyo Y (2005) Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. Radiographics 25:425–438 discussion 438–440PubMedCrossRef Nakanishi T, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, Sumii K, Gomyo Y (2005) Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. Radiographics 25:425–438 discussion 438–440PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO et al (2004) Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 24:787–800PubMedCrossRef Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO et al (2004) Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 24:787–800PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artefacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering
Authors
Lars Husmann
Bernhard A. Herzog
Nina Burkhard
Fuminari Tatsugami
Ines Valenta
Oliver Gaemperli
Christophe A. Wyss
Ulf Landmesser
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1339-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

European Radiology 7/2009 Go to the issue