Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2009

01-06-2009 | Cardiac

Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Authors: Paul Stolzmann, Joseph Knight, Lotus Desbiolles, Willibald Maier, Hans Scheffel, André Plass, Vartan Kurtcuoglu, Sebastian Leschka, Dimos Poulikakos, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of aortic root geometry is a prerequisite to anticipate complications of transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation. We determined coronary ostial locations and aortic root dimensions in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and compared these values with normal subjects using computed tomography (CT). One hundred consecutive patients with severe tricuspid AS and 100 consecutive patients without valvular pathology (referred to as the controls) undergoing cardiac dual-source CT were included. Distances from the aortic annulus (AA) to the left coronary ostium (LCO), right coronary ostium (RCO), the height of the left coronary sinus (HLS), right coronary sinus (HRS), and aortic root dimensions [diameters of AA, sinus of Valsalva (SV), and sino-tubular junction(STJ)] were measured. LCO and RCO were 14.9 ± 3.2 mm (8.2–25.9) and 16.8 ± 3.6 mm (12.0–25.7) in the controls, 15.5 ± 2.9 mm (8.8–24.3) and 17.3 ± 3.6 mm (7.3–26.0) in patients with AS. Controls and patients with AS had similar values for LCO (P = 0.18), RCO (P = 0.33) and HLS (P = 0.88), whereas HRS (P < 0.05) was significantly larger in patients with AS. AA (r = 0.55,P < 0.001), SV (r = 0.54,P < 0.001), and STJ (r = 0.52,P < 0.001) significantly correlated with the body surface area in the controls; whereas no correlation was found in patients with AS. Patients with AS had significantly larger AA (P < 0.01) and STJ (P < 0.01) diameters when compared with the controls. In patients with severe tricuspid AS, coronary ostial locations were similar to the controls, but a transverse remodelling of the aortic root was recognized. Owing to the large distribution of ostial locations and the dilatation of the aortic root, CT is recommended before TAV implantation in each patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243PubMedCrossRef Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG et al (2000) Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:747–756PubMedCrossRef Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG et al (2000) Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:747–756PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–e148PubMedCrossRef Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:e1–e148PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lutter G, Ardehali R, Cremer J et al (2004) Percutaneous valve replacement: current state and future prospects. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2199–2206PubMedCrossRef Lutter G, Ardehali R, Cremer J et al (2004) Percutaneous valve replacement: current state and future prospects. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2199–2206PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2006) Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1214–1223PubMedCrossRef Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2006) Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1214–1223PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113:842–850PubMedCrossRef Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113:842–850PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:I240–I245PubMedCrossRef Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:I240–I245PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ye J, Cheung A, Lichtenstein SV et al (2007) Six-month outcome of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the initial seven patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:16–21PubMedCrossRef Ye J, Cheung A, Lichtenstein SV et al (2007) Six-month outcome of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the initial seven patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:16–21PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eltchaninoff H, Zajarias A, Tron C et al (2008) [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: technical aspects, results and indications]. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101:126–132PubMedCrossRef Eltchaninoff H, Zajarias A, Tron C et al (2008) [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: technical aspects, results and indications]. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101:126–132PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008PubMedCrossRef Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2002) Steps toward percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Circulation 105:775–778PubMedCrossRef Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2002) Steps toward percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Circulation 105:775–778PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lutter G, Kuklinski D, Berg G et al (2002) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: an experimental study. I. Studies on implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:768–776PubMedCrossRef Lutter G, Kuklinski D, Berg G et al (2002) Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: an experimental study. I. Studies on implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:768–776PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2003) Percutaneous valve insertion: a new approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:741–742 author reply 742–743PubMed Boudjemline Y, Bonhoeffer P (2003) Percutaneous valve insertion: a new approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:741–742 author reply 742–743PubMed
14.
go back to reference Huber CH, Tozzi P, Corno AF et al (2004) Do valved stents compromise coronary flow? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:754–759PubMedCrossRef Huber CH, Tozzi P, Corno AF et al (2004) Do valved stents compromise coronary flow? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:754–759PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2020–2024PubMedCrossRef Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al (2006) Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2020–2024PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1658–1665PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1658–1665PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A et al (2007) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 100:701–706PubMedCrossRef Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A et al (2007) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 100:701–706PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al (2007) Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:111–121PubMedCrossRef Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al (2007) Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:111–121PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lu TL, Huber CH, Rizzo E et al (2008) Ascending aorta measurements as assessed by ECG-gated multi-detector computed tomography: a pilot study to establish normative values for transcatheter therapies. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1182-8 Lu TL, Huber CH, Rizzo E et al (2008) Ascending aorta measurements as assessed by ECG-gated multi-detector computed tomography: a pilot study to establish normative values for transcatheter therapies. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-008-1182-8
20.
go back to reference Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 317:1098PubMed Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 317:1098PubMed
21.
go back to reference Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617PubMedCrossRef Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2004) Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:698–703PubMedCrossRef Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al (2004) Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:698–703PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240:47–55PubMedCrossRef Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 240:47–55PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1652–1658PubMedCrossRef LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1652–1658PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:197–203PubMedCrossRef Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:197–203PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Swanson M, Clark RE (1974) Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res 35:871–882PubMed Swanson M, Clark RE (1974) Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res 35:871–882PubMed
30.
go back to reference Jatene MB, Monteiro R, Guimaraes MH et al (1999) Aortic valve assessment. Anatomical study of 100 healthy human hearts. Arq Bras Cardiol 73:75–86PubMedCrossRef Jatene MB, Monteiro R, Guimaraes MH et al (1999) Aortic valve assessment. Anatomical study of 100 healthy human hearts. Arq Bras Cardiol 73:75–86PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cavalcanti JS, de Melo NC, de Vasconcelos RS (2003) Morphometric and topographic study of coronary ostia. Arq Bras Cardiol 81:359–362 355–358PubMedCrossRef Cavalcanti JS, de Melo NC, de Vasconcelos RS (2003) Morphometric and topographic study of coronary ostia. Arq Bras Cardiol 81:359–362 355–358PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Crawford MH, Roldan CA (2001) Prevalence of aortic root dilatation and small aortic roots in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 87:1311–1313PubMedCrossRef Crawford MH, Roldan CA (2001) Prevalence of aortic root dilatation and small aortic roots in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 87:1311–1313PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ et al (1995) Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:793–800PubMedCrossRef Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ et al (1995) Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:793–800PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D et al (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356–362PubMedCrossRef Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D et al (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356–362PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al (2007) Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244:745–754PubMedCrossRef Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al (2007) Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 244:745–754PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Saam T, Oberhoffer M, Rist C et al (2008) [Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography]. Rofo 180:553–560PubMed Saam T, Oberhoffer M, Rist C et al (2008) [Assessment of aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement: comparative evaluation of dual-source CT and echocardiography]. Rofo 180:553–560PubMed
Metadata
Title
Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Authors
Paul Stolzmann
Joseph Knight
Lotus Desbiolles
Willibald Maier
Hans Scheffel
André Plass
Vartan Kurtcuoglu
Sebastian Leschka
Dimos Poulikakos
Borut Marincek
Hatem Alkadhi
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1302-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

European Radiology 6/2009 Go to the issue