Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Experimental

Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: Comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction

Authors: H. Brodoefel, A. Reimann, B. Klumpp, M. Fenchel, M. Heuschmid, C. Burgstahler, S. Schroeder, S. Miller, C. D. Claussen, A. M. Scheule, A. F. Kopp

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose was to assess 64-slice CT in the analysis of global and regional ventricular function, using a model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction in comparison with cine-MRI. Seven pigs underwent standard MSCT and MRI examination a median 1 and 21 days following creation of reperfused myocardial infarction. Endocardial and epicardial contours were manually defined and ventricular volumes calculated according to Simpson’s method. Results were compared by Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Blant-Altman analysis. Wall motion was assessed on cine-images and evaluated by kappa statistics. MSCT revealed a strong correlation with cine-MRI regarding quantification of end-diastolic volume (EDV; r = 0.97), end-systolic volume (ESV; r = 0.97), stroke volume (SV; r = 0.94), ejection fraction (EF; r = 0.95) or myocardial mass (MM; r =0.94 ). Minor overestimation was observed for EDV and ESV (bias −1.7 ml; −1.5 ml; P=0.095; 0.025), whilst the mean difference for EF was found to be negligible (bias 0.9%; P = 0.18). Both modalities showed a 96.2% segmental agreement in regional wall motion (weighted-kappa 0.91 for 238 segments). This was true for both acute and subacute infarct phase and MSCT, and thereby enabled accurate intraindividual follow-up of segmental dysfunction. Sixty-four-slice CT allows for reliable analysis of global cardiac function and, moreover, provides accurate evaluation of wall motion in acute and subacute myocardial infarct.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB et al (1994) Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 90:2645–2657PubMed Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB et al (1994) Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 90:2645–2657PubMed
2.
go back to reference Moise A, Bourassa MG, Theroux P et al (1985) Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 55:941–946PubMedCrossRef Moise A, Bourassa MG, Theroux P et al (1985) Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 55:941–946PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127PubMedCrossRef Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T et al (2003) Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 38:653–661PubMedCrossRef Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T et al (2003) Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 38:653–661PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S et al (2006) Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 16:551–559PubMedCrossRef Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S et al (2006) Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 16:551–559PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D et al (2006) MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: are short-axis image reformations necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S371–S378PubMedCrossRef Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D et al (2006) MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: are short-axis image reformations necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S371–S378PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P et al (2004) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 176:1786–1793PubMed Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P et al (2004) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 176:1786–1793PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P et al (2005) Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology 236:112–117PubMedCrossRef Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P et al (2005) Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology 236:112–117PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736–744PubMedCrossRef Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736–744PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:765–773PubMed Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:765–773PubMed
12.
go back to reference Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S et al (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234:381–390PubMedCrossRef Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S et al (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234:381–390PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571PubMedCrossRef Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323PubMedCrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:111–117PubMedCrossRef Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:111–117PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582PubMedCrossRef Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575–582PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thompson BH, Stanford W (1994) Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 32:537–551PubMed Thompson BH, Stanford W (1994) Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 32:537–551PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A, Franken U, Trappe HJ (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9–16PubMedCrossRef Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A, Franken U, Trappe HJ (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9–16PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542PubMedCrossRef Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263–269PubMedCrossRef Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263–269PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH (2000) Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:430–438PubMedCrossRef Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH (2000) Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:430–438PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD (1968) Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37:149–159PubMed Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD (1968) Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37:149–159PubMed
25.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al (2002) Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1545–1550PubMed Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al (2002) Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1545–1550PubMed
26.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230:403–410PubMedCrossRef Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230:403–410PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15:714–720PubMedCrossRef Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15:714–720PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Marban E (1991) Myocardial stunning and hibernation. The physiology behind the colloquialisms. Circulation 83:681–688PubMed Marban E (1991) Myocardial stunning and hibernation. The physiology behind the colloquialisms. Circulation 83:681–688PubMed
29.
go back to reference Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2006) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 13:480–487PubMedCrossRef Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2006) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 13:480–487PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al (2006) Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med 47:1288–1294PubMed Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al (2006) Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med 47:1288–1294PubMed
31.
go back to reference Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A et al (2003) Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 175:1051–1055PubMed Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A et al (2003) Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 175:1051–1055PubMed
Metadata
Title
Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: Comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction
Authors
H. Brodoefel
A. Reimann
B. Klumpp
M. Fenchel
M. Heuschmid
C. Burgstahler
S. Schroeder
S. Miller
C. D. Claussen
A. M. Scheule
A. F. Kopp
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0673-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

European Radiology 11/2007 Go to the issue