Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2015

Open Access 01-11-2015 | Original Article

Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors: Johanna C. Bendell, Lee S. Rosen, Robert J. Mayer, Jonathan W. Goldman, Jeffrey R. Infante, Fabio Benedetti, Donghu Lin, Hirokazu Mizuguchi, Christopher Zergebel, Manish R. Patel

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate safety of TAS-102 administered twice daily (bid) on days 1–5 and 8–12 of a 4-week cycle, confirm feasibility of the Japanese recommended dose (RD), 35 mg/m2, in Western patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard chemotherapies, and describe preliminary antitumor activity.

Methods

This open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 study was conducted at four US centers. Patients were enrolled into two sequential cohorts [30 (cohort 1) or 35 mg/m2/dose bid (cohort 2)]; dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were evaluated during cycle 1 in dose-escalation cohorts. At RD, 15 additional patients were enrolled in an expansion cohort.

Results

Patients (N = 27) with refractory mCRC received TAS-102; 74 % had received ≥4 prior regimens. DLT was not observed in three patients in cohort 1, and was in one out of nine patients in cohort 2 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Therefore, RD was identified as 35 mg/m2 bid. At RD, fatigue (63 %), gastrointestinal disturbances and nausea (46 %), vomiting (46 %), and diarrhea (42 %) were common but rarely grade 3/4. Grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea occurred at 4 % each. Grade 3/4 toxicity was predominantly hematologic [neutropenia (71 %), anemia (25 %)]; febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients. Stable disease lasting ≥6 weeks was achieved by 16 evaluable patients (70 %); median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 7.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

TAS-102 has an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of disease stabilization in Western patients with refractory mCRC. Results from a randomized phase 3 study have shown survival benefit with disease stabilization evidence in this population.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:104–117CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:104–117CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2014). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Colon cancer, version 3. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 26 March 2014 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2014). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Colon cancer, version 3. http://​www.​nccn.​org. Accessed 26 March 2014
4.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, Jandik P, Iveson T, Carmichael J, Alakl M, Gruia G, Awad L, Rougier P (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047CrossRefPubMed Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, Jandik P, Iveson T, Carmichael J, Alakl M, Gruia G, Awad L, Rougier P (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tournigand C, André T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, Quinaux E, Couteau C, Buyse M, Ganem G, Landi B, Colin P, Louvet C, de Gramont A (2004) FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229–237CrossRefPubMed Tournigand C, André T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, Quinaux E, Couteau C, Buyse M, Ganem G, Landi B, Colin P, Louvet C, de Gramont A (2004) FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229–237CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I et al (2007) Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol 25:1670–1676CrossRefPubMed Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I et al (2007) Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol 25:1670–1676CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, Schmoll HJ (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, Schmoll HJ (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–2342CrossRefPubMed Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–2342CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D’Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK, Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J, Rougier P (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, D’Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK, Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J, Rougier P (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, André T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJ, Strickland AH, Wilson G, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tzekova V, Collins S, Oliner KS, Rong A, Gansert J (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4706–4713CrossRefPubMed Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, Hotko Y, André T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJ, Strickland AH, Wilson G, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tzekova V, Collins S, Oliner KS, Rong A, Gansert J (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:4706–4713CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicenter, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicenter, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Emura T, Suzuki N, Yamaguchi M, Ohshimo H, Fukushima M (2004) A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol 25:571–578PubMed Emura T, Suzuki N, Yamaguchi M, Ohshimo H, Fukushima M (2004) A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol 25:571–578PubMed
13.
go back to reference Suzuki N, Nakagawa F, Nukatsuka M, Fukushima M (2011) Trifluorothymidine exhibits potent antitumor activity via the induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Exp Ther Med 2:393–397PubMedCentralPubMed Suzuki N, Nakagawa F, Nukatsuka M, Fukushima M (2011) Trifluorothymidine exhibits potent antitumor activity via the induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Exp Ther Med 2:393–397PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fukushima M, Suzuki N, Emura T, Yano S, Kazuno H, Tada Y, Yamada Y, Asao T (2000) Structure and activity of specific inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase to potentiate the function of antitumor 2′deoxyribonucleosides. Biochem Pharmacol 59:1227–1236CrossRefPubMed Fukushima M, Suzuki N, Emura T, Yano S, Kazuno H, Tada Y, Yamada Y, Asao T (2000) Structure and activity of specific inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase to potentiate the function of antitumor 2′deoxyribonucleosides. Biochem Pharmacol 59:1227–1236CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3:330–338CrossRefPubMed Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3:330–338CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Kazuno H, Emura T, Tsujimoto H, Suzuki N, Fukushima M (2000) Different mechanisms of acquired resistance to fluorinated pyrimidines in human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Oncol 17:277–283PubMed Murakami Y, Kazuno H, Emura T, Tsujimoto H, Suzuki N, Fukushima M (2000) Different mechanisms of acquired resistance to fluorinated pyrimidines in human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Oncol 17:277–283PubMed
17.
go back to reference Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effects on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13:545–549PubMed Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effects on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13:545–549PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bijnsdorp IV, Peters GJ, Temmink OH, Fukushima M, Kruyt FA (2010) Differential activation of cell death and autophagy results in an increased cytotoxic potential for trifluorothymidine compared with 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cells. Int J Cancer 126:2457–2468PubMed Bijnsdorp IV, Peters GJ, Temmink OH, Fukushima M, Kruyt FA (2010) Differential activation of cell death and autophagy results in an increased cytotoxic potential for trifluorothymidine compared with 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cells. Int J Cancer 126:2457–2468PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hong DS, Abbruzzese JL, Bogaard K, Lassere Y, Fukushima M, Mita A, Kuwata K, Hoff PM (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107:1383–1390CrossRefPubMed Hong DS, Abbruzzese JL, Bogaard K, Lassere Y, Fukushima M, Mita A, Kuwata K, Hoff PM (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107:1383–1390CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Overman MJ, Varadhachary G, Kopetz S, Thomas MB, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, Mita A, Wolff RA, Hoff P, Xiong H, Abbruzzese JL (2008) Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 26:445–454CrossRefPubMed Overman MJ, Varadhachary G, Kopetz S, Thomas MB, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, Mita A, Wolff RA, Hoff P, Xiong H, Abbruzzese JL (2008) Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 26:445–454CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Varadhachary G, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, Mita A, Wolff RA, Hoff P, Xiong H, Abbruzzese JL (2008) Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Invest 26:794–799CrossRefPubMed Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Varadhachary G, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, Mita A, Wolff RA, Hoff P, Xiong H, Abbruzzese JL (2008) Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Invest 26:794–799CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Doi T, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T, Boku N, Onozawa Y, Fukutomi A, Hironaka S, Koizumi W, Sasaki T (2012) Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer 107:429–434PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Doi T, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T, Boku N, Onozawa Y, Fukutomi A, Hironaka S, Koizumi W, Sasaki T (2012) Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer 107:429–434PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Green MC, Pusztai L, Theriault RL, Adinin RB, Hofweber M, Fukushima M, Mita A, Bindra N, Hortobagyi GN (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 24(18S):10576 Green MC, Pusztai L, Theriault RL, Adinin RB, Hofweber M, Fukushima M, Mita A, Bindra N, Hortobagyi GN (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 24(18S):10576
24.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Brookmeyer R, Crowley J (1982) A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 38:29–41CrossRef Brookmeyer R, Crowley J (1982) A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 38:29–41CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yoshino T, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K, Nishina T, Komatsu Y, Baba H, Tsuji A, Yamaguchi K, Muro K, Sugimoto N, Tsuji Y, Moriwaki T, Esaki T, Hamada C, Tanase T, Ohtsu A (2012) TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 13:993–1001CrossRefPubMed Yoshino T, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K, Nishina T, Komatsu Y, Baba H, Tsuji A, Yamaguchi K, Muro K, Sugimoto N, Tsuji Y, Moriwaki T, Esaki T, Hamada C, Tanase T, Ohtsu A (2012) TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 13:993–1001CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1909–1919CrossRefPubMed Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1909–1919CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
Authors
Johanna C. Bendell
Lee S. Rosen
Robert J. Mayer
Jonathan W. Goldman
Jeffrey R. Infante
Fabio Benedetti
Donghu Lin
Hirokazu Mizuguchi
Christopher Zergebel
Manish R. Patel
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2850-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine