Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Article

Dose adaptation of capecitabine based on individual prediction of limiting toxicity grade: evaluation by clinical trial simulation

Authors: Ines Paule, Michel Tod, Emilie Hénin, Benoit You, Gilles Freyer, Pascal Girard

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Anticancer drugs often show a narrow therapeutic index and high inter-patient variability, which can lead to the need to adjust doses individually during the treatment. One approach to doing this is to use individual model predictions. Such methods have been proposed to target-specific drug concentrations or blood cell count, both of which are continuous variables. However, many toxic effects are evaluated on a categorical scale. This article presents a novel approach to dose adjustments for reducing a graded toxicity while maintaining efficacy, applied to hand-and-foot syndrome (HFS) induced by capecitabine.

Methods

A mixed-effects proportional odds Markov model relating capecitabine doses to HFS grades was individually adjusted at the end of each treatment cycle (3 weeks) by estimating subject-specific parameters by Bayesian MAP technique. It was then used to predict the risk of intolerable (grade ≥ 2) toxicity over the next treatment cycle and determine the next dose accordingly, targeting a predefined tolerable risk. Proof of concept was given by simulating virtual clinical trials, where the standard dose reductions and the prediction-based adaptations were compared, and where the therapeutic effect was simulated using a colorectal tumor inhibition model. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to test various specifications of prediction-based adaptation.

Results

Individualized dose adaptation might reduce the average duration of intolerable HFS by 10 days as compared to the standard reductions (3.8 weeks vs. 5.2 weeks; 27% relative reduction) without compromising antitumor efficacy (both responder rates were 49%). A clinical trial comparing the two methods should include 350 patients per arm to achieve at least 90% power to show a difference in grade ≥2 HFS duration at an alpha level of 0.05.

Conclusions

These results indicate that individual prediction-based dose adaptation based on ordinal data may be feasible and beneficial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller AA (2002) Body surface area in dosing anticancer agents: scratch the surface!. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1822–1823PubMedCrossRef Miller AA (2002) Body surface area in dosing anticancer agents: scratch the surface!. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1822–1823PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Melmon KL (1972) Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage. Comput Biomed Res 5:411–459PubMedCrossRef Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Melmon KL (1972) Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage. Comput Biomed Res 5:411–459PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Jonge ME, Huitema AD, Schellens JH et al (2005) Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:147–173PubMedCrossRef de Jonge ME, Huitema AD, Schellens JH et al (2005) Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:147–173PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zandvliet AS, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD (2008) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology. Clin Pharmacokinet 47:487–513PubMedCrossRef Zandvliet AS, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD (2008) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology. Clin Pharmacokinet 47:487–513PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rousseau A, Marquet P (2002) Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 16:253–262PubMedCrossRef Rousseau A, Marquet P (2002) Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 16:253–262PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoff PM, Cassidy J, Schmoll HJ (2001) The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral. Oncologist 6(Suppl 4):3–11PubMedCrossRef Hoff PM, Cassidy J, Schmoll HJ (2001) The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral. Oncologist 6(Suppl 4):3–11PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blesch KS, Gieschke R, Tsukamoto Y et al (2003) Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience. Invest New Drugs 21:195–223PubMedCrossRef Blesch KS, Gieschke R, Tsukamoto Y et al (2003) Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience. Invest New Drugs 21:195–223PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kara IO, Sahin B, Erkisi M (2006) Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia due to docetaxel-capecitabine therapy is treated with vitamin E without dose reduction. Breast 15:414–424PubMedCrossRef Kara IO, Sahin B, Erkisi M (2006) Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia due to docetaxel-capecitabine therapy is treated with vitamin E without dose reduction. Breast 15:414–424PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Henin E, You B, Van Cutsem E et al (2009) A dynamic model of hand-and-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:418–425PubMedCrossRef Henin E, You B, Van Cutsem E et al (2009) A dynamic model of hand-and-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:418–425PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Claret L, Girard P, Hoff PM et al (2009) Model-based prediction of phase III overall survival in colorectal cancer on the basis of phase II tumor dynamics. J Clin Oncol 27:4103–4108PubMedCrossRef Claret L, Girard P, Hoff PM et al (2009) Model-based prediction of phase III overall survival in colorectal cancer on the basis of phase II tumor dynamics. J Clin Oncol 27:4103–4108PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacqmin P, Snoeck E, van Schaick EA et al (2007) Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34:57–85PubMedCrossRef Jacqmin P, Snoeck E, van Schaick EA et al (2007) Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34:57–85PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cockcroft D, Gault MD (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41PubMedCrossRef Cockcroft D, Gault MD (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313 Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
18.
go back to reference Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in fortran 77: the Art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in fortran 77: the Art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20.
go back to reference Paule I, Girard P, Tod M (2011) Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects of a mixed–effects proportional odds Markov model for ordinal data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Published online 26-05-2011 Paule I, Girard P, Tod M (2011) Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects of a mixed–effects proportional odds Markov model for ordinal data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Published online 26-05-2011
21.
go back to reference Milano G et al (1999) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and fluorouracil-related toxicity. Br J Cancer 79:627–630PubMedCrossRef Milano G et al (1999) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and fluorouracil-related toxicity. Br J Cancer 79:627–630PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Caronia D, Martin M, Sastre J et al (2011) A polymorphism in the cytidine deaminase promoter predicts severe capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome. Clin Cancer Res 17(7):2006–2013PubMedCrossRef Caronia D, Martin M, Sastre J et al (2011) A polymorphism in the cytidine deaminase promoter predicts severe capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome. Clin Cancer Res 17(7):2006–2013PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ribelles N, López-Siles J, Sánchez A et al (2008) A carboxylesterase 2 gene polymorphism as predictor of capecitabine on response and time to progression. Curr Drug Metab 9(4):336–343PubMedCrossRef Ribelles N, López-Siles J, Sánchez A et al (2008) A carboxylesterase 2 gene polymorphism as predictor of capecitabine on response and time to progression. Curr Drug Metab 9(4):336–343PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Park DJ, Stoehlmacher J, Zhang W et al (2002) Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism predicts response to capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 17(1):46–49PubMedCrossRef Park DJ, Stoehlmacher J, Zhang W et al (2002) Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism predicts response to capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 17(1):46–49PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sharma R, Hoskins JM, Rivory LP et al (2008) Thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and toxicity to capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 14(3):817–825PubMedCrossRef Sharma R, Hoskins JM, Rivory LP et al (2008) Thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and toxicity to capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 14(3):817–825PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Haba E, García MI, Cortejoso L et al (2010) ABCB1 gene polymorphisms are associated with adverse reactions in fluoropyrimidine-treated colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics 11(12):1715–1723PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez-Haba E, García MI, Cortejoso L et al (2010) ABCB1 gene polymorphisms are associated with adverse reactions in fluoropyrimidine-treated colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics 11(12):1715–1723PubMedCrossRef
27.
Metadata
Title
Dose adaptation of capecitabine based on individual prediction of limiting toxicity grade: evaluation by clinical trial simulation
Authors
Ines Paule
Michel Tod
Emilie Hénin
Benoit You
Gilles Freyer
Pascal Girard
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1714-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine