Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2006

01-02-2006 | Original Article

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adherence to oral topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

Authors: Cheri E. Klein, Helen Kastrissios, Antonius A. Miller, Donna Hollis, Daohai Yu, Gary L. Rosner, David L. Grinblatt, Richard A. Larson, Mark J. Ratain

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate medication adherence, pharmacokinetics and exposure versus response relationships in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Methods: Ninety adult patients with MDS received oral topotecan (1.2 mg/m2) either once a day for 10  days or twice a day for 5  days every 21 days for up to six cycles. Dosing histories were collected using electronic monitoring devices fitted to medication vials. Topotecan plasma concentrations were measured, and exposure was determined by a sparse sampling approach and Bayesian estimation methods. Relationships between exposure and clinical response and toxicity were evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Overall adherence was excellent with 90% of patients taking the prescribed number of doses in cycle 1. Adherence did not differ between the two regimens. Topotecan pharmacokinetics were described using a one compartment open model with first order absorption and elimination. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates did not differ between the once a day and twice a day dosing groups. While topotecan exposure was greater in the twice a day arm compared to the once a day arm due to drug accumulation, exposure did not correlate with clinical response. However, the probability of needing a platelet transfusion in the twice a day arm was significantly increased (by 35%) as a result of greater steady-state plasma topotecan concentrations. Conclusions: Adherence is high in patients with MDS receiving oral topotecan, whether the drug is prescribed once or twice daily. The optimal schedule cannot be determined from this study, as there was no evident relationship between any pharmacokinetic parameter and clinical response.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fenaux P (1999) Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Degos L, Linch DC, Lowenberg B (eds) Textbook of malignant haematology. Martin Dunitz, London Fenaux P (1999) Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Degos L, Linch DC, Lowenberg B (eds) Textbook of malignant haematology. Martin Dunitz, London
2.
go back to reference Burns CP (1999) Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Foley JF, Vose JM, Armitage JO (eds) Current therapy in cancer. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 374–381 Burns CP (1999) Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Foley JF, Vose JM, Armitage JO (eds) Current therapy in cancer. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 374–381
3.
go back to reference Beran M, Estey E, OBrien S, Cortes J, Koller CA, Giles FJ et al (1999) Topotecan and cytarabine is an active combination regimen in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 17:2819–2830PubMed Beran M, Estey E, OBrien S, Cortes J, Koller CA, Giles FJ et al (1999) Topotecan and cytarabine is an active combination regimen in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 17:2819–2830PubMed
4.
go back to reference Beran M, Kantarjian H, OBrien S, Koller C, Al-Bitar M, Arbuck S et al (1996) Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is active in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 88:2473–2479PubMed Beran M, Kantarjian H, OBrien S, Koller C, Al-Bitar M, Arbuck S et al (1996) Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is active in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 88:2473–2479PubMed
5.
go back to reference Beran M, Shen Y, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Koller CA, Giles FJ et al (2001) High-dose chemotherapy in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: covariate adjusted comparison of five regimens. Cancer 92:1999–2015CrossRefPubMed Beran M, Shen Y, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Koller CA, Giles FJ et al (2001) High-dose chemotherapy in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: covariate adjusted comparison of five regimens. Cancer 92:1999–2015CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference DeMario MD, Ratain MJ (1998) Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. J Clin Oncol 16:2557–2567PubMed DeMario MD, Ratain MJ (1998) Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. J Clin Oncol 16:2557–2567PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lilenbaum RC, Miller AA, Batist G, Bernard S, Hollis DR, Rosner GL et al (1998) Phase I and pharmacologic study of continuous infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer: a cancer and leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol 16:3302–3309PubMed Lilenbaum RC, Miller AA, Batist G, Bernard S, Hollis DR, Rosner GL et al (1998) Phase I and pharmacologic study of continuous infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer: a cancer and leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol 16:3302–3309PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gerrits CJ, Burris H, Schellens JH, Eckardt JR, Planting AS, van der Burg ME et al (1998) Oral topotecan given once or twice daily for ten days: a phase I pharmacology study in adult patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 4:1153–1158PubMed Gerrits CJ, Burris H, Schellens JH, Eckardt JR, Planting AS, van der Burg ME et al (1998) Oral topotecan given once or twice daily for ten days: a phase I pharmacology study in adult patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 4:1153–1158PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cramer J, Spilker B (1991) Patient compliance in medical practice and clinical trials. Raven Press, New York Cramer J, Spilker B (1991) Patient compliance in medical practice and clinical trials. Raven Press, New York
10.
go back to reference Kastrissios H, Blaschke TF (1997) Medication compliance as a feature in drug development. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37:451–475CrossRefPubMed Kastrissios H, Blaschke TF (1997) Medication compliance as a feature in drug development. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37:451–475CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1992) NONMEM Users Guide, NONMEM Project Group. UCSF, San Francisco Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1992) NONMEM Users Guide, NONMEM Project Group. UCSF, San Francisco
12.
go back to reference Mandema JW, Verotta D, Sheiner LB (1992) Building population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 20:511–528CrossRefPubMed Mandema JW, Verotta D, Sheiner LB (1992) Building population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 20:511–528CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (1998) Guidelines for reporting of adverse drug reactions. Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda National Cancer Institute (1998) Guidelines for reporting of adverse drug reactions. Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
14.
go back to reference Lee C, Nicholson P, Souhami R, Deshmukh A (1992) Patient compliance with oral chemotherapy as assessed by a novel electronic technique. J Clin Oncol 10:1007–1013PubMed Lee C, Nicholson P, Souhami R, Deshmukh A (1992) Patient compliance with oral chemotherapy as assessed by a novel electronic technique. J Clin Oncol 10:1007–1013PubMed
15.
go back to reference Waterhouse D, Calzone K, Mele C, Brenner D (1993) Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 11:1189–1197PubMed Waterhouse D, Calzone K, Mele C, Brenner D (1993) Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 11:1189–1197PubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Herben V, Rosing H, tenBokkel Huinink W, van Zomeren D, Batchelor D, Doyle E et al (1999) Oral topotecan: bioavailability and the effect of food co-administration. Br J Cancer 80:1380–1386CrossRefPubMed Herben V, Rosing H, tenBokkel Huinink W, van Zomeren D, Batchelor D, Doyle E et al (1999) Oral topotecan: bioavailability and the effect of food co-administration. Br J Cancer 80:1380–1386CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, de Jonge MJ (2000) Inter- and intrapatient variability in oral topotecan pharmacokinetics: implications for body-surface area dosage regimens. Clin Cancer Res 6:2685–2689PubMed Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Sparreboom A, Verweij J, de Jonge MJ (2000) Inter- and intrapatient variability in oral topotecan pharmacokinetics: implications for body-surface area dosage regimens. Clin Cancer Res 6:2685–2689PubMed
19.
go back to reference Creemers G, Gerrits C, Eckhardt J, Schellens J, Burris H, Planting A et al (1997) Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 15:1087–1093PubMed Creemers G, Gerrits C, Eckhardt J, Schellens J, Burris H, Planting A et al (1997) Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 15:1087–1093PubMed
20.
go back to reference Gerrits C, Burris H, Schellens J, Planting A, van den Burg M, Rodriguez G et al (1998) Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin) a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 34:1030–1035CrossRefPubMed Gerrits C, Burris H, Schellens J, Planting A, van den Burg M, Rodriguez G et al (1998) Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin) a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 34:1030–1035CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gerrits CJ, Schellens JH, Burris H, Eckhardt JR, Planting AS, van der Burg ME et al (1999) A comparison of clinical pharmacodynamics of different administration schedules of oral topotecan (Hycamtin). Clin Cancer Res 5:69–75PubMed Gerrits CJ, Schellens JH, Burris H, Eckhardt JR, Planting AS, van der Burg ME et al (1999) A comparison of clinical pharmacodynamics of different administration schedules of oral topotecan (Hycamtin). Clin Cancer Res 5:69–75PubMed
22.
go back to reference Schellens J, Creemers G, Beijen J, de Boer-Dennert M, McDonald M, Davies B, Verweij J (1996) Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan: a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. Br J Cancer 73:1268–1271PubMed Schellens J, Creemers G, Beijen J, de Boer-Dennert M, McDonald M, Davies B, Verweij J (1996) Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan: a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. Br J Cancer 73:1268–1271PubMed
23.
go back to reference White SC, Cheesman S, Thatcher N, Anderson H, Carrington B, Hearn S et al (2000) Phase II study of oral topotecan in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:868–873PubMed White SC, Cheesman S, Thatcher N, Anderson H, Carrington B, Hearn S et al (2000) Phase II study of oral topotecan in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:868–873PubMed
24.
go back to reference Montazeri A, Boucaud M, Lokiec F, Pinguet F, Culine S, Deporte-Fety R et al (2000) Population pharmacokinetics of topotecan: intraindividual variability in total drug. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46:375–381CrossRefPubMed Montazeri A, Boucaud M, Lokiec F, Pinguet F, Culine S, Deporte-Fety R et al (2000) Population pharmacokinetics of topotecan: intraindividual variability in total drug. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46:375–381CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference O’Reilly S, Rowinsky EK, Slichenmyer W, Donehower RC, Forastiere AA, Ettinger DS et al (1996) Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Oncol 14:3062–3073PubMed O’Reilly S, Rowinsky EK, Slichenmyer W, Donehower RC, Forastiere AA, Ettinger DS et al (1996) Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Oncol 14:3062–3073PubMed
26.
go back to reference Léger F, Loos WJ, Fourcade J, Bugat R, Goffinet M, Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, Sparreboom A, Chatelut E (2004) Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis. Br J Cancer 90:343–347CrossRefPubMed Léger F, Loos WJ, Fourcade J, Bugat R, Goffinet M, Mathijssen RHJ, Verweij J, Sparreboom A, Chatelut E (2004) Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis. Br J Cancer 90:343–347CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Grochow LB, Rowinsky EK, Johnson R, Ludeman S, Kaufmann SH, McCabe FL et al (1992) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients with advanced cancer. Drug Metab Dispos 20:706–713PubMed Grochow LB, Rowinsky EK, Johnson R, Ludeman S, Kaufmann SH, McCabe FL et al (1992) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients with advanced cancer. Drug Metab Dispos 20:706–713PubMed
28.
go back to reference Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Verweij J, Brouwer E, de Jonge MJ, Sparreboom A (2000) Gender-dependent pharmacokinetics of topotecan in adult patients. Anticancer Drugs 11:673–680CrossRefPubMed Loos WJ, Gelderblom HJ, Verweij J, Brouwer E, de Jonge MJ, Sparreboom A (2000) Gender-dependent pharmacokinetics of topotecan in adult patients. Anticancer Drugs 11:673–680CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Jonsson E, Fridborg H, Csoka K, Dhar S, Sundstrom C, Nygren P, Larsson R (1997) Cytotoxic activity of topotecan in human tumour cell lines and primary cultures of human tumour cells from patients. Br J Cancer 76:211–219PubMed Jonsson E, Fridborg H, Csoka K, Dhar S, Sundstrom C, Nygren P, Larsson R (1997) Cytotoxic activity of topotecan in human tumour cell lines and primary cultures of human tumour cells from patients. Br J Cancer 76:211–219PubMed
30.
go back to reference Erickson-Miller CL, May RD, Tomaszewski J, Osborn B, Murphy MJ, Page JG, Parchment RE (1997) Different toxicity of camptothecin, topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin to human, canine and murine myeloid progenitors (CFU-GM) in vitro. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:467–472CrossRefPubMed Erickson-Miller CL, May RD, Tomaszewski J, Osborn B, Murphy MJ, Page JG, Parchment RE (1997) Different toxicity of camptothecin, topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin to human, canine and murine myeloid progenitors (CFU-GM) in vitro. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:467–472CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adherence to oral topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study
Authors
Cheri E. Klein
Helen Kastrissios
Antonius A. Miller
Donna Hollis
Daohai Yu
Gary L. Rosner
David L. Grinblatt
Richard A. Larson
Mark J. Ratain
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0023-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2006 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine