Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Hematology 10/2012

Open Access 01-10-2012 | Original Article

Perceived information provision and satisfaction among lymphoma and multiple myeloma survivors—results from a Dutch population-based study

Authors: Simone Oerlemans, Olga Husson, Floortje Mols, Philip Poortmans, Henk Roerdink, Laurien A. Daniels, Carien L. Creutzberg, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse

Published in: Annals of Hematology | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

To improve posttreatment care for (long-term) lymphoma survivors in the Netherlands, survivorship clinics are being developed. As information provision is an important aspect of survivorship care, our aim was to evaluate the current perceived level of and satisfaction with information received by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and multiple myeloma (MM) survivors, and to identify associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was used to select all patients diagnosed with NHL, HL and MM from 1999 to 2009. In total, 1,448 survivors received a questionnaire, and 1,135 of them responded (78.4 %). The EORTC QLQ-INFO25 was used to evaluate the perceived level of and satisfaction with information. Two thirds of survivors were satisfied with the amount of received information, with HL survivors being most satisfied (74 %). At least 25 % of survivors wanted more information. Young age, having had chemotherapy, having been diagnosed more recently, using internet for information and having no comorbidities were the most important factors associated with higher perceived levels of information provision. Although information provision and satisfaction with information seems relatively good in lymphoma and MM survivors, one third expressed unmet needs. Furthermore, variations between subgroups were observed. Good information provision is known to be associated with better quality of life. Survivorship care plans could be a way to achieve this.
Literature
2.
4.
go back to reference McInnes DK, Cleary PD, Stein KD et al (2008) Perceptions of cancer-related information among cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society's Studies of Cancer Survivors. Cancer 113:1471–1479PubMedCrossRef McInnes DK, Cleary PD, Stein KD et al (2008) Perceptions of cancer-related information among cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society's Studies of Cancer Survivors. Cancer 113:1471–1479PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Davies NJ, Kinman G, Thomas RJ, Bailey T (2008) Information satisfaction in breast and prostate cancer patients: implications for quality of life. Psychooncology 17:1048–1052PubMedCrossRef Davies NJ, Kinman G, Thomas RJ, Bailey T (2008) Information satisfaction in breast and prostate cancer patients: implications for quality of life. Psychooncology 17:1048–1052PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Degner LF, Davison BJ, Sloan JA, Mueller B (1998) Development of a scale to measure information needs in cancer care. J Nurs Meas 6:137–153PubMed Degner LF, Davison BJ, Sloan JA, Mueller B (1998) Development of a scale to measure information needs in cancer care. J Nurs Meas 6:137–153PubMed
7.
go back to reference Butow PN, Kazemi JN, Beeney LJ et al (1996) When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77:2630–2637PubMedCrossRef Butow PN, Kazemi JN, Beeney LJ et al (1996) When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77:2630–2637PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV (2011) The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 22:761–772PubMedCrossRef Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV (2011) The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 22:761–772PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kvam AK, Fayers P, Hjermstad M et al (2009) Health-related quality of life assessment in randomised controlled trials in multiple myeloma: a critical review of methodology and impact on treatment recommendations. Eur J Haematol 83:279–289PubMedCrossRef Kvam AK, Fayers P, Hjermstad M et al (2009) Health-related quality of life assessment in randomised controlled trials in multiple myeloma: a critical review of methodology and impact on treatment recommendations. Eur J Haematol 83:279–289PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Oerlemans S, Mols F, Nijziel MR et al (2011) The impact of treatment, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics on health-related quality of life among Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a systematic review. Ann Hematol 90:993–1004PubMedCrossRef Oerlemans S, Mols F, Nijziel MR et al (2011) The impact of treatment, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics on health-related quality of life among Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a systematic review. Ann Hematol 90:993–1004PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
12.
go back to reference van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, Eenbergen MV et al (2011) The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. Eur J Cancer 47(14):2188–94PubMedCrossRef van de Poll-Franse LV, Horevoorts N, Eenbergen MV et al (2011) The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: Scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts. Eur J Cancer 47(14):2188–94PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arraras JI, Kuljanic-Vlasic K, Bjordal K et al (2007) EORTC QLQ-INFO26: a questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries. Psychooncology 16:249–254PubMedCrossRef Arraras JI, Kuljanic-Vlasic K, Bjordal K et al (2007) EORTC QLQ-INFO26: a questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries. Psychooncology 16:249–254PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O et al (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738PubMedCrossRef Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O et al (2010) An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 46:2726–2738PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH et al (2003) The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 49:156–163PubMedCrossRef Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH et al (2003) The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 49:156–163PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K et al (1971) Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res 31:1860–1861PubMed Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K et al (1971) Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res 31:1860–1861PubMed
17.
go back to reference Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139–144PubMed Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139–144PubMed
19.
go back to reference Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W et al (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2:179–189PubMedCrossRef Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W et al (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2:179–189PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Davis TC, Dolan NC, Ferreira MR et al (2001) The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Invest 19:193–200PubMedCrossRef Davis TC, Dolan NC, Ferreira MR et al (2001) The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Invest 19:193–200PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E et al (2002) Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 52:134–149PubMedCrossRef Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E et al (2002) Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 52:134–149PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Husson O, Holterhues C, Mols F et al (2010) Melanoma survivors are dissatisfied with perceived information about their diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care. Br J Dermatol 163:879–881PubMedCrossRef Husson O, Holterhues C, Mols F et al (2010) Melanoma survivors are dissatisfied with perceived information about their diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care. Br J Dermatol 163:879–881PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S et al (1999) Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ 319:1247–1248PubMedCrossRef Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S et al (1999) Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ 319:1247–1248PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD et al (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns 57:250–261PubMedCrossRef Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD et al (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns 57:250–261PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jansen J, van Weert J, van Dulmen S et al (2007) Patient education about treatment in cancer care: an overview of the literature on older patients' needs. Cancer Nurs 30:251–260PubMedCrossRef Jansen J, van Weert J, van Dulmen S et al (2007) Patient education about treatment in cancer care: an overview of the literature on older patients' needs. Cancer Nurs 30:251–260PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Petersson LM, Nordin K, Glimelius B et al (2002) Differential effects of cancer rehabilitation depending on diagnosis and patients' cognitive coping style. Psychosom Med 64:971–980PubMedCrossRef Petersson LM, Nordin K, Glimelius B et al (2002) Differential effects of cancer rehabilitation depending on diagnosis and patients' cognitive coping style. Psychosom Med 64:971–980PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S et al (2002) The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 6:1–244PubMed Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S et al (2002) The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 6:1–244PubMed
28.
go back to reference Matsuyama RK, Wilson-Genderson M, Kuhn L et al (2011) Education level, not health literacy, associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 85(3):e229–36PubMedCrossRef Matsuyama RK, Wilson-Genderson M, Kuhn L et al (2011) Education level, not health literacy, associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 85(3):e229–36PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer A, Kindig D (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer A, Kindig D (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
30.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Metadata
Title
Perceived information provision and satisfaction among lymphoma and multiple myeloma survivors—results from a Dutch population-based study
Authors
Simone Oerlemans
Olga Husson
Floortje Mols
Philip Poortmans
Henk Roerdink
Laurien A. Daniels
Carien L. Creutzberg
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Hematology / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1495-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Annals of Hematology 10/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.