Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress

Authors: Shahida Bibi, Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar, Jasna Coralic, Mohamed Bayoumi, Joubin Khorsand, Daniel T. Farkas, Leela M. Prasad

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the learning curve and perioperative outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy during the first 102 cases by a single surgeon.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on the first 102 cases of single-site robotic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into five chronological groups based on the date of surgery, with 20 patients in each group except the 5th group which had 22 patients. The groups were compared by docking time, robotic dissection time, and overall surgery time. A P value of 0.05 was used as statistically significant.

Results

The female to male ratio was 2:1. The mean age was 51 years (18–87) and the mean BMI was 28.26 (18–41). Overall, 69 % of the patients underwent elective cholecystectomy and 31 % required urgent surgery. In all, 17 % of patients had previous abdominal surgeries. In total, 45 % of procedures were regarded as same day surgery. The total mean length of stay was 1.97 days (0–8). The mean operative time was 110 min (36–265), mean robotic console time 70 min (26–179), and mean docking time 9 min (1–26). The overall conversion rate was 3.9 % and the complication rate was 4 %. The docking time, robotic time, and average operative time were significantly different in the first group as compared to the remaining the five groups (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Single-site robotic cholecystectomy is safe in both elective and urgent conditions, and in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. It has a short learning curve.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curcillo PG, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A et al (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860CrossRefPubMed Curcillo PG, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A et al (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510CrossRefPubMed Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mutter D, Callari C, Diana M, Dallemagne B, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2001) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:453–457CrossRef Mutter D, Callari C, Diana M, Dallemagne B, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2001) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:453–457CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M (2011) Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 7:24–27PubMedCentralPubMed Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M (2011) Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 7:24–27PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127CrossRefPubMed Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Allemann P, Leroy J, Asakuma M, Al Abeidi F, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2010) Robotics may overcome technical limitations of single-trocar surgery: an experimental prospective study of Nissen fundoplication. Arch Surg 145:267–271CrossRefPubMed Allemann P, Leroy J, Asakuma M, Al Abeidi F, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2010) Robotics may overcome technical limitations of single-trocar surgery: an experimental prospective study of Nissen fundoplication. Arch Surg 145:267–271CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Seo IY, Rim JS (2011) Bilateral robotic single-site partial nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:435–438CrossRefPubMed Seo IY, Rim JS (2011) Bilateral robotic single-site partial nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:435–438CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26:1648–1655CrossRefPubMed Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26:1648–1655CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2014) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260(1):134–141CrossRefPubMed Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2014) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260(1):134–141CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ayloo S, Choudhury N (2014) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy. JSLS 18(3):115-119 Ayloo S, Choudhury N (2014) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy. JSLS 18(3):115-119
12.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A et al (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147:709–714CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A et al (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147:709–714CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F (2011) Robotic single-port Cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2182–2186CrossRefPubMed Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F (2011) Robotic single-port Cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2182–2186CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR (2006) Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 136(2):172–178CrossRefPubMed Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR (2006) Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 136(2):172–178CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M (2012) Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 26:2687–2694CrossRefPubMed Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M (2012) Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 26:2687–2694CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhou MW, Gu XD, Xiang JB, Chen ZY (2014) Comparison of clinical safety and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:274516PubMedCentralPubMed Zhou MW, Gu XD, Xiang JB, Chen ZY (2014) Comparison of clinical safety and outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:274516PubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE, Jung M, Volonte F, Hagen ME (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE, Jung M, Volonte F, Hagen ME (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):18–25CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Kreaden US, Hagen ME (2013) Docking of the da Vinci Si Surgical System® with single-site technology. Int J Med Robot 9:12–16CrossRefPubMed Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Kreaden US, Hagen ME (2013) Docking of the da Vinci Si Surgical System® with single-site technology. Int J Med Robot 9:12–16CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chaudhary S, Bhullar JS, Subhas G, Mittal VK, Kolachalam R (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) using non-articulating instruments and conventional trocars-single surgeon experience. J Gastrointest Surg 17(4):809–813CrossRefPubMed Chaudhary S, Bhullar JS, Subhas G, Mittal VK, Kolachalam R (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) using non-articulating instruments and conventional trocars-single surgeon experience. J Gastrointest Surg 17(4):809–813CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Angus AA, Sahi SL, McIntosh BB (2014) Learning curve and early clinical outcomes for a robotic surgery novice performing robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 10(2):203–207CrossRefPubMed Angus AA, Sahi SL, McIntosh BB (2014) Learning curve and early clinical outcomes for a robotic surgery novice performing robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 10(2):203–207CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606CrossRefPubMed Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:598–606CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kaczmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–373, 365–370 Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kaczmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(3):365–373, 365–370
25.
go back to reference Kamiński JP, Bueltmann KW, Rudnicki M (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means? J Gastrointest Surg 18(12):2116–2122CrossRefPubMed Kamiński JP, Bueltmann KW, Rudnicki M (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means? J Gastrointest Surg 18(12):2116–2122CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Müller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC Davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Müller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC Davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16:1790–1801CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16:1790–1801CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1205–1213CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Fung AK, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1353–1364CrossRefPubMed Fung AK, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1353–1364CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress
Authors
Shahida Bibi
Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar
Jasna Coralic
Mohamed Bayoumi
Joubin Khorsand
Daniel T. Farkas
Leela M. Prasad
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3135-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

World Journal of Surgery 10/2015 Go to the issue