Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Scientific Report

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Post-operative Pain in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors: Stephen Kin Yong Chang, Yi Liang Wang, Liang Shen, Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer, Krishnakumar Madhavan

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

An increasing body of evidence is being published about single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), but there are no well-powered trials with an adequate evaluation of post-operative pain. This randomized trial compares SILC against four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with post-operative pain as the primary endpoint.

Methods

Hundred patients were randomized to either SILC (n = 50) or LC (n = 50). Exclusion criteria were (1) Acute cholecystitis; (2) ASA 3 or above; (3) Bleeding disorders; and (4) Previous open upper abdominal surgery. Patients and post-operative assessors were blinded to the procedure performed. The site and severity of pain were compared at 4 h, 24 h, 14 days and 6 months post-procedure using the visual analog scale; non-inferiority was assumed when the lower boundary of the 95 % confidence interval of the difference was above −1 and superiority when p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The study arms were demographically similar. At 24 h post-procedure, SILC was associated with less pain at extra-umbilical sites (rest: p = 0.004; movement: p = 0.008). Pain data were inconclusive at 24 h at the umbilical site on movement; SILC was otherwise non-inferior for pain at all other points. Operating duration was longer in SILC (79.46 vs 58.88 min, p = 0.003). 8 % of patients in each arm suffered complications (p = 1.000). Re-intervention rates, analgesic use, return to function, and patient satisfaction did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

SILC has improved short-term pain outcomes compared to LC and is not inferior in both short-term and long-term pain outcomes. The operating time is longer, but remains feasible in routine surgical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Litynski GS (1998) Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed Litynski GS (1998) Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2(4):341–346PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rao PP, Rao PP, Bhagwat SS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery—current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 7(1):6–16PubMedCentralPubMed Rao PP, Rao PP, Bhagwat SS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery—current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 7(1):6–16PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J et al (2012) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(3):65–74CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J et al (2012) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(3):65–74CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yuen ABT, Wai PYC, Kwok EWN (2010) Current developments in natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based review. World J Gastroenterol 16(38):4792–4799CrossRef Yuen ABT, Wai PYC, Kwok EWN (2010) Current developments in natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based review. World J Gastroenterol 16(38):4792–4799CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Junker H (1974) Laparoscopic tubal ligation by the single puncture technique (author’s translation). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 34:952–955PubMed Junker H (1974) Laparoscopic tubal ligation by the single puncture technique (author’s translation). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 34:952–955PubMed
9.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hirano Y, Watanabe T, Uchida T et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 16(2):270–274CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hirano Y, Watanabe T, Uchida T et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 16(2):270–274CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24(6):1403–1412CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24(6):1403–1412CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M (2011) Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 7(1):24–27PubMedCentralPubMed Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M (2011) Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 7(1):24–27PubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Romanelli JR, Roshek TB 3rd, Lynn DC, Earle DB (2010) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24(6):1374–1379CrossRefPubMed Romanelli JR, Roshek TB 3rd, Lynn DC, Earle DB (2010) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24(6):1374–1379CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24(8):1842–1848CrossRefPubMed Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24(8):1842–1848CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K et al (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201(3):369–373CrossRefPubMed Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K et al (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201(3):369–373CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012CrossRefPubMed Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G et al (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1790–1801CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G et al (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1790–1801CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L et al (2013) Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(1):14–20CrossRefPubMed Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L et al (2013) Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(1):14–20CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pan MX, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y et al (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19(3):394–398CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pan MX, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y et al (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19(3):394–398CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Luna RA, Noqueira DB, Varela PS et al (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27(4):1254–1259 Luna RA, Noqueira DB, Varela PS et al (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27(4):1254–1259
21.
go back to reference Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira FD et al (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27(3):1009–1015CrossRefPubMed Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira FD et al (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27(3):1009–1015CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36(11):2644–2653CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 36(11):2644–2653CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F et al (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(7):2293–2304 Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F et al (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(7):2293–2304
24.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101PubMed
25.
go back to reference Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047CrossRefPubMed Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Post-operative Pain in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Authors
Stephen Kin Yong Chang
Yi Liang Wang
Liang Shen
Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer
Krishnakumar Madhavan
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2903-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

World Journal of Surgery 4/2015 Go to the issue