Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014

Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Tumor Involved Resection Margin in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastric Resection

Authors: Jung-Woo Woo, Keun Won Ryu, Ji Yeon Park, Bang Wool Eom, Mi Jung Kim, Hong Man Yoon, Sook Ryun Park, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Il Ju Choi, Young-Woo Kim, Young-Iee Park

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of patients with positive surgical resection margins is dismal in gastric cancer. However, the influence of positive margin itself on prognosis is still uncertain, especially in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margins in stage III–IV AGC after gastric resection in comparison with other well-known factors.

Methods

Among 1,536 consecutive gastric cancer patients who received intentional curative resection for stage III–IV AGC between April 2001 and December 2011 at the National Cancer Center, 35 patients (2.28 %) had positive resection margins on their final histology. A comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence pattern, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was made between positive margin (PM) patients and negative margin (NM) patients.

Results

Among the 35 PM patients, 15 (42.9 %) had proximal involved margins, 21 (60.0 %) had distal involved margins, and one (2.9 %) had both involved margins. Twenty-eight PM patients (80.0 %) were stage III, and 7 (20.0 %) were stage IV. Recurrence was significantly higher in PM than NM (63.6 % vs. 39.7 %, respectively; p = 0.005). The OS and DFS rates were significantly lower in the PM group than in the NM group (14.9 vs. 36.3 months, p < 0.001 and 11.6 vs. 27.1 months, p = 0.005, respectively). The presence of PM was an independent risk factor for both OS and DFS.

Conclusions

The presence of PM is an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. Considering the prognostic impact of PM, a sufficient resection margin should be ensured when determining the resection line in gastrectomy with curative intent. The reoperation to secure clear resection margins should be considered as a treatment of choice in the case of PM.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F et al (2009) Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer 125:666–673PubMedCrossRef Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F et al (2009) Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer 125:666–673PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Nagini S (2012) Carcinoma of the stomach: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, molecular genetics and chemoprevention. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4:156–169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nagini S (2012) Carcinoma of the stomach: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, molecular genetics and chemoprevention. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4:156–169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ et al (2007) Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J Surg Oncol 95:461–468PubMedCrossRef Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ et al (2007) Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J Surg Oncol 95:461–468PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection-line involvement in patients undergoing curative resections for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32:433–437CrossRef Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J et al (1996) Prognostic value of resection-line involvement in patients undergoing curative resections for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 32:433–437CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim SH, Karpeb MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Karpeb MS, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 3:24–33PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA et al (1993) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg 80:1418–1420PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V et al (1999) Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:291–293PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yokota T, Sawai K, Yamaguchi T et al (1993) Resection margin in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal invasion: clinicopathological study. J Surg Oncol 53:60–63PubMedCrossRef Yokota T, Sawai K, Yamaguchi T et al (1993) Resection margin in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal invasion: clinicopathological study. J Surg Oncol 53:60–63PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef Papachristou DN, Agnanti N, D’Agostino H et al (1980) Histologically positive esophageal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 139:711–713PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW et al (2000) Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 87:236–242PubMedCrossRef Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW et al (2000) Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 87:236–242PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nagata T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S et al (2011) Prognostic impact of microscopic positive margin in gastric cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 104:592–597PubMedCrossRef Nagata T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S et al (2011) Prognostic impact of microscopic positive margin in gastric cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 104:592–597PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711PubMedCrossRef Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dexter SP, Sue-Ling H, McMahon MJ et al (2001) Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut 48:667–670PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dexter SP, Sue-Ling H, McMahon MJ et al (2001) Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut 48:667–670PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eom BW, Yoon H, Ryu KW et al (2010) Predictors of timing and patterns of recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer. Dig Surg 27:481–486PubMedCrossRef Eom BW, Yoon H, Ryu KW et al (2010) Predictors of timing and patterns of recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer. Dig Surg 27:481–486PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL et al (2009) Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2738–2743PubMedCrossRef Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL et al (2009) Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2738–2743PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN et al (2009) Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3028–3037PubMedCrossRef Sun Z, Li DM, Wang ZN et al (2009) Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3028–3037PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J et al (2001) Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 345:725–730PubMedCrossRef Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J et al (2001) Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 345:725–730PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee J, Lim do H, Kim S et al (2012) Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial. J Clin Oncol 30:268–273PubMedCrossRef Lee J, Lim do H, Kim S et al (2012) Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial. J Clin Oncol 30:268–273PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chen JD, Yang XP, Shen JG et al (2013) Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:229–234PubMedCrossRef Chen JD, Yang XP, Shen JG et al (2013) Prognostic improvement of reexcision for positive resection margins in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:229–234PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Tumor Involved Resection Margin in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastric Resection
Authors
Jung-Woo Woo
Keun Won Ryu
Ji Yeon Park
Bang Wool Eom
Mi Jung Kim
Hong Man Yoon
Sook Ryun Park
Myeong-Cherl Kook
Il Ju Choi
Young-Woo Kim
Young-Iee Park
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2301-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue