Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Original Article

What Makes a Difference? Three-Dimensional Morphological Study of Parameters that Determine Breast Aesthetics

Authors: Lin Chen, Jingjing Sun, Dali Mu, Chunjun Liu, Jie Luan

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The goal of breast plastic surgery is to improve the shape of the breasts. The shape of the breast is determined by several parameters and proportions; however, the proportions that have the greatest impact on breast aesthetics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study is to determine which breast proportions are crucial to aesthetics and should be given priority when surgery is designed.

Methods

Breasts were divided into a high-satisfaction group and a low-satisfaction group according to an aesthetic evaluation that consisted of self-evaluations and evaluations by plastic surgeons. Three-dimensional scanning and measurement of the breasts were performed. The differences in breast parameters and proportions between the two groups were analyzed, and the ROC curve of each proportion was applied to determine which index had a significant influence on satisfaction and could predict satisfaction well.

Results

A total of 179 unilateral breasts were evaluated and measured; of these, 68 breasts were classified as high satisfaction, and 111 were classified as low satisfaction. There were no significant differences in breast width between the two groups. In the high-satisfaction group, the absolute value and the value divided by the breast width of breast projection and the lower pole length were significantly greater than those of the low-satisfaction group. The areas under the ROC for breast projection and lower pole length, as aesthetic predictive indexes, were greater than 0.7.

Conclusions

Breast width emerged as the benchmark of breast aesthetic assessment. Breast projection and the lower pole length had a great impact on unilateral breast aesthetics and should be given priority when improving the breast shape, and appropriate ratio of low pole length and breast projection to breast radius might bring a more satisfying outcome.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch V, Bennett JE (1986) Surgical treatment of congenital breast asymmetry. Ann Plast Surg 17(2):92–101CrossRef Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch V, Bennett JE (1986) Surgical treatment of congenital breast asymmetry. Ann Plast Surg 17(2):92–101CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):331–335CrossRef Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE (1986) Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):331–335CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(2):468–479CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1):58–70CrossRef Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1):58–70CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rigotti C, Ferrigno G, Aliverti A, Pedotti A (1998) Surface scanning: an application to mammary surgery. J Biomed Opt 3(2):161–170CrossRef Rigotti C, Ferrigno G, Aliverti A, Pedotti A (1998) Surface scanning: an application to mammary surgery. J Biomed Opt 3(2):161–170CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2125–2132CrossRef Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2125–2132CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139CrossRef Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56(3):229–236CrossRef Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56(3):229–236CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Passalis G, Theoharis T, Miller M, Kakadiaris IA (2003) Noninvasive automatic breast volume estimation for post-mastectomy breast reconstructive surgery. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439), Cancun, Mexico, IEEE; September 17–21 Passalis G, Theoharis T, Miller M, Kakadiaris IA (2003) Noninvasive automatic breast volume estimation for post-mastectomy breast reconstructive surgery. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439), Cancun, Mexico, IEEE; September 17–21
14.
go back to reference Yang J, Zhang R, Shen J, Hu Y, Lv Q (2015) The three-dimensional techniques in the objective measurement of breast aesthetics. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(6):910–915CrossRef Yang J, Zhang R, Shen J, Hu Y, Lv Q (2015) The three-dimensional techniques in the objective measurement of breast aesthetics. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(6):910–915CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chae M, Rozen W, Spychal R, Huntersmith D (2016) Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques. Gland Surg 5(2):212–226PubMedPubMedCentral Chae M, Rozen W, Spychal R, Huntersmith D (2016) Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques. Gland Surg 5(2):212–226PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(1):8–16CrossRef Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(1):8–16CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuzbari R, Deutinger M, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Freilinger G (1993) Surgical treatment of developmental asymmetry of the breast long term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27(3):203–207CrossRef Kuzbari R, Deutinger M, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Freilinger G (1993) Surgical treatment of developmental asymmetry of the breast long term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27(3):203–207CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D (2003) Breast-areola-nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):510–513CrossRef Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D (2003) Breast-areola-nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):510–513CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liu YJ, Thomson JG (2011) Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67(1):7–11CrossRef Liu YJ, Thomson JG (2011) Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67(1):7–11CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Swanson E (2015) Ideal breast shape: women prefer convexity and upper pole fullness. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):641e–643eCrossRef Swanson E (2015) Ideal breast shape: women prefer convexity and upper pole fullness. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):641e–643eCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR (1985) Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11(3):575–578CrossRef Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR (1985) Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11(3):575–578CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Agbenorku P, Agbenorku M, Iddi A, Amevor E, Sefenu R, Osei D (2011) Measurements of breasts of young West African females: a guideline in anatomical landmarks for adolescent breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Sur 35(1):49–54CrossRef Agbenorku P, Agbenorku M, Iddi A, Amevor E, Sefenu R, Osei D (2011) Measurements of breasts of young West African females: a guideline in anatomical landmarks for adolescent breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Sur 35(1):49–54CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, Trogen C, Selvaggi G (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple-areola complex on the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(5):724–732CrossRef Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, Trogen C, Selvaggi G (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple-areola complex on the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(5):724–732CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Swanson E (2012) A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(4):982–992CrossRef Swanson E (2012) A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(4):982–992CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7):2005–2016 Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2006) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(7):2005–2016
Metadata
Title
What Makes a Difference? Three-Dimensional Morphological Study of Parameters that Determine Breast Aesthetics
Authors
Lin Chen
Jingjing Sun
Dali Mu
Chunjun Liu
Jie Luan
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01426-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2020 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

Introduction