Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Review

The Three-Dimensional Techniques in the Objective Measurement of Breast Aesthetics

Authors: Jiqiao Yang, Run Zhang, Jiani Shen, Yuanyuan Hu, Qing Lv

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast symmetry, size, and shape are key components of aesthetic outcomes of augmentation mammoplasty, reduction, and reconstruction. Many have claimed that the 3D scanning technique, which measures breast volumes directly and assesses the asymmetry of the chest and breast on a 3D model, is superior to anthropometric measuring in accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. The documented methods of 3D body surface imaging include laser scanning, stereo photography and so on. To achieve ideal aesthetic results, individualized surgery planning based on a reliable virtual model of the prospective surgery outcome could be of considerable value in decision making and assisting in guidance for the surgery procedure. Additionally, the 3D scanning technique is applicable in postoperative monitoring of morphological change, notably, in a dynamic way. Another distinguishing feature is that it enables virtual division of breast volume, thus surgeons could virtually divide the breast volumes into portions using 3D scanning during the programming and evaluation of surgery plans. However, because 3D surface scanning cannot look through the breast substances and reach the interspace between the chest and posterior border of the breast/dorsal limit of the breast, the inframammary fold in larger breasts cannot be correctly imaged, leaving the preoperative inframammary fold reference lacking. Therefore, 3D scanning is thought to be inaccurate in large and/or ptotic breasts. Another fact that prevents 3D scanning from wide application is its high cost and lack of access.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ji K, Luan J, Liu CJ, Mu DL, Mu LH et al (2014) A prospective study of breast dynamic morphological changes after dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty with 3D scanning technique. PLoS One 9:e93010PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ji K, Luan J, Liu CJ, Mu DL, Mu LH et al (2014) A prospective study of breast dynamic morphological changes after dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty with 3D scanning technique. PLoS One 9:e93010PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Becker H (2012) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:893e–894eCrossRefPubMed Becker H (2012) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:893e–894eCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Liu CJ, Luan J, Mu LH, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed Liu CJ, Luan J, Mu LH, Ji K (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2125–2132CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tepper OM, Choi M, Small K, Unger J, Davidson E et al (2008) An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1875–1885CrossRefPubMed Tepper OM, Choi M, Small K, Unger J, Davidson E et al (2008) An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1875–1885CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501CrossRefPubMed Gladilin E, Gabrielova B, Montemurro P, Hedén P (2011) Customized planning of augmentation mammaplasty with silicon implants using three-dimensional optical body scans and biomechanical modeling of soft tissue outcome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:494–501CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S et al (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S et al (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Liu CJ, Luan J, Ji K, Sun JJ (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1134–1139CrossRefPubMed Liu CJ, Luan J, Ji K, Sun JJ (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1134–1139CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ahcan U, Bracun D, Zivec K, Butala P (2012) The use of 3D laser imaging and a new breast replica cast as a method to optimize autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 21:183–189CrossRefPubMed Ahcan U, Bracun D, Zivec K, Butala P (2012) The use of 3D laser imaging and a new breast replica cast as a method to optimize autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 21:183–189CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A et al (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:185–191CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A et al (2013) The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:185–191CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Eder M, Klöppel M, Müller D, Papadopulos NA, Machens H et al (2013) 3-D analysis of breast morphology changes after inverted T-scar and vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty over 12 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:776–786CrossRefPubMed Eder M, Klöppel M, Müller D, Papadopulos NA, Machens H et al (2013) 3-D analysis of breast morphology changes after inverted T-scar and vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty over 12 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:776–786CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eder M, Fv W, Sichtermann M, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA et al (2011) Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1152–1160CrossRefPubMed Eder M, Fv W, Sichtermann M, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA et al (2011) Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1152–1160CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Isogai N, Sai K, Kamiishi H, Watatani M, Inui H et al (2006) Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner. Ann Plast Surg 56:237–242CrossRefPubMed Isogai N, Sai K, Kamiishi H, Watatani M, Inui H et al (2006) Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner. Ann Plast Surg 56:237–242CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N, Kurita M, Oshima Y et al (2010) Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J 16:169–175CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N, Kurita M, Oshima Y et al (2010) Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J 16:169–175CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Small K, Choi M, Petruolo O, Lee C, Karp N (2014) Is there an ideal donor site of fat for secondary breast reconstruction? Aesthet Surg J 34:545–550CrossRefPubMed Small K, Choi M, Petruolo O, Lee C, Karp N (2014) Is there an ideal donor site of fat for secondary breast reconstruction? Aesthet Surg J 34:545–550CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Spanholtz TA, Leitsch S, Holzbach T, Volkmer E, Engelhardt T et al (2012) 3-dimensional imaging systems: first experience in planning and documentation of plastic surgery procedures. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 44:234–239CrossRefPubMed Spanholtz TA, Leitsch S, Holzbach T, Volkmer E, Engelhardt T et al (2012) 3-dimensional imaging systems: first experience in planning and documentation of plastic surgery procedures. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 44:234–239CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Small KH, Tepper OM, Unger JG, Kumar N, Feldman DL et al (2010) Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:346–353CrossRefPubMed Small KH, Tepper OM, Unger JG, Kumar N, Feldman DL et al (2010) Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:346–353CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Choi M, Unger J, Small K, Tepper O, Kumar N et al (2009) Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 62:518–522CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Unger J, Small K, Tepper O, Kumar N et al (2009) Defining the kinetics of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 62:518–522CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Quan M, Fadl A, Small K, Tepper O, Kumar N et al (2011) Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:357–364CrossRefPubMed Quan M, Fadl A, Small K, Tepper O, Kumar N et al (2011) Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:357–364CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gladlin E (2008) Individual prediction and optimization of breast augmentation using 3D scans and biomechanical simulation of soft tissue. Akademikliniken’s fourth international aesthetic symposium. Stockholm, Sweden Gladlin E (2008) Individual prediction and optimization of breast augmentation using 3D scans and biomechanical simulation of soft tissue. Akademikliniken’s fourth international aesthetic symposium. Stockholm, Sweden
20.
go back to reference Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2007) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:356–357CrossRefPubMed Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L (2007) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:356–357CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Machens HG, Biemer E, Kovacs L (2008) Three-dimensional surface imaging for objective quantification and prediction of breast reduction mammaplasty: gain or gadget? Plast Reconstr Surg 121:71CrossRef Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Machens HG, Biemer E, Kovacs L (2008) Three-dimensional surface imaging for objective quantification and prediction of breast reduction mammaplasty: gain or gadget? Plast Reconstr Surg 121:71CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eder M, Grabhorn A, Fv W, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA et al (2013) Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging. Surg Innov 20:356–364CrossRefPubMed Eder M, Grabhorn A, Fv W, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA et al (2013) Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging. Surg Innov 20:356–364CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Koch MC, Adamietz B, Jud SM, Fasching PA, Haeberle L et al (2011) Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:847–855CrossRefPubMed Koch MC, Adamietz B, Jud SM, Fasching PA, Haeberle L et al (2011) Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:847–855CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Thomson JG, Liu YJ, Restifo RJ, Rinker BD, Reis A (2009) Surface area measurement of the female breast: phase I. Validation of a novel optical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1588–1596CrossRefPubMed Thomson JG, Liu YJ, Restifo RJ, Rinker BD, Reis A (2009) Surface area measurement of the female breast: phase I. Validation of a novel optical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1588–1596CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Busche MN, Vogt PM (2013) Autologous fat transplantation: volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. A systematic review. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:380–387CrossRef Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Busche MN, Vogt PM (2013) Autologous fat transplantation: volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. A systematic review. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:380–387CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–476CrossRefPubMed Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–476CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Öhberg F, Zachrisson A, Holmner-Rocklöv Å (2014) Three-dimensional camera system for measuring arm volume in women with lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Lymphat Res Biol 12:267–274CrossRefPubMed Öhberg F, Zachrisson A, Holmner-Rocklöv Å (2014) Three-dimensional camera system for measuring arm volume in women with lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Lymphat Res Biol 12:267–274CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Loyer EM, Kroll SS, David CL, DuBrow RA, Libshitz HI (1991) Mammographic and CT findings after breast reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:1159–1162CrossRefPubMed Loyer EM, Kroll SS, David CL, DuBrow RA, Libshitz HI (1991) Mammographic and CT findings after breast reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:1159–1162CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kim SM, Park JM (2004) Mammographic and ultrasonographic features after autogenous myocutaneous flap reconstruction mammoplasty. J Ultrasound Med 23:275–282PubMed Kim SM, Park JM (2004) Mammographic and ultrasonographic features after autogenous myocutaneous flap reconstruction mammoplasty. J Ultrasound Med 23:275–282PubMed
31.
go back to reference Mineyev M, Kramer D, Kaufman L, Carlson J, Frankel S (1995) Measurement of breast implant volume with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 34:348–351CrossRefPubMed Mineyev M, Kramer D, Kaufman L, Carlson J, Frankel S (1995) Measurement of breast implant volume with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 34:348–351CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Herold C, Reichelt A, Stieglitz LH, Dettmer S, Knobloch K et al (2010) MRI-based breast volumetry—evaluation of three different software solutions. J Digit Imaging 23:603–610PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Herold C, Reichelt A, Stieglitz LH, Dettmer S, Knobloch K et al (2010) MRI-based breast volumetry—evaluation of three different software solutions. J Digit Imaging 23:603–610PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Azar FS, Metaxas DN, Schnall MD (2001) A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Acad Radiol 8:965–975CrossRefPubMed Azar FS, Metaxas DN, Schnall MD (2001) A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Acad Radiol 8:965–975CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB (2001) Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:271–279CrossRefPubMed Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB (2001) Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:271–279CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pamplona DC, de Abreu AC (2004) Breast reconstruction with expanders and implants: a numerical analysis. Artif Organs 28:353–356CrossRefPubMed Pamplona DC, de Abreu AC (2004) Breast reconstruction with expanders and implants: a numerical analysis. Artif Organs 28:353–356CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ruiter NV, Stotzka R, Muller T-O, Gemmeke H, Reichenbach JR et al (2006) Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53:204–211CrossRef Ruiter NV, Stotzka R, Muller T-O, Gemmeke H, Reichenbach JR et al (2006) Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53:204–211CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16:137–145CrossRefPubMed Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M et al (2007) Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast 16:137–145CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Catanuto G, Spano A, Pennati A, Riggio E, Farinella GM et al (2008) Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:314–318CrossRefPubMed Catanuto G, Spano A, Pennati A, Riggio E, Farinella GM et al (2008) Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:314–318CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Kim Y, Lee K, Kim W (2008) 3D virtual simulator for breast plastic surgery. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 19:515–526CrossRef Kim Y, Lee K, Kim W (2008) 3D virtual simulator for breast plastic surgery. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 19:515–526CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Tepper O (2009) 3D imaging for planning and analysis in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:108–109 Tepper O (2009) 3D imaging for planning and analysis in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:108–109
41.
go back to reference Koban KC, Leitsch S, Holzbach T, Volkmer E, Metz PM et al (2014) 3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet: an alternative to professional systems? Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 46:97–104CrossRefPubMed Koban KC, Leitsch S, Holzbach T, Volkmer E, Metz PM et al (2014) 3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet: an alternative to professional systems? Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 46:97–104CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, Wöhnl A et al (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56:229–236CrossRefPubMed Kovacs L, Yassouridis A, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, Wöhnl A et al (2006) Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Ann Plast Surg 56:229–236CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Hirsch EM, Chukwu CS, Butt Z, Khan SA, Galiano RD (2014) A pilot assessment of ethnic differences in cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:e94PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hirsch EM, Chukwu CS, Butt Z, Khan SA, Galiano RD (2014) A pilot assessment of ethnic differences in cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:e94PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Henseler H, Khambay BS, Bowman A, Smith J, Siebert JP et al (2011) Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:577–582CrossRefPubMed Henseler H, Khambay BS, Bowman A, Smith J, Siebert JP et al (2011) Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:577–582CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Henseler H, Smith J, Bowman A, Khambay BS, Ju XY et al (2012) Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:e332–e337CrossRefPubMed Henseler H, Smith J, Bowman A, Khambay BS, Ju XY et al (2012) Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:e332–e337CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Three-Dimensional Techniques in the Objective Measurement of Breast Aesthetics
Authors
Jiqiao Yang
Run Zhang
Jiani Shen
Yuanyuan Hu
Qing Lv
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0560-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 6/2015 Go to the issue