Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

Metrics of the Aesthetically Perfect Breast

Authors: Bishara Atiye, Fadel Chahine

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast surgery has long been viewed as an art more than a science. However, defining and objectively measuring the ideal breast morphology and aesthetic proportions are fundamental for surgical planning and to setting the goals of surgery as well as to evaluate surgical outcomes. Despite the fact that much has been written about aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, there is still no real consensus about what the attributes are of an ideal breast. Moreover, there are in fact no objective standard measurement systems and guidelines to describe ideal or even normal breast shape. Though there is great variability in the perception of beauty among patients and surgeons alike due to many factors among which are age, sex, and sociocultural background, there is common agreement that beauty is a universal phenomenon that has a universal standard present across all civilizations and centuries, and that perceived beauty is enhanced and optimal aesthetics are achieved when proper measurements are made and anthropometric proportions as well as attractive harmonious ratios are respected. The current review is an attempt to summarize the most relevant information available trying to introduce some harmony in our perception of aesthetic ideals of breast surgery.
Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632CrossRef Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 65:8e16 Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 65:8e16
3.
go back to reference Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, Liu YJ, Shah A, Patel A, Persing JA, Thomson JG (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, Liu YJ, Shah A, Patel A, Persing JA, Thomson JG (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN (2008) Numeric expression of aesthetics and beauty. Aesth Plast Surg. 32:209–216CrossRef Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN (2008) Numeric expression of aesthetics and beauty. Aesth Plast Surg. 32:209–216CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fantozzi F (2013) Applications of anthropometry in torsoplastic surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 36:519–526CrossRef Fantozzi F (2013) Applications of anthropometry in torsoplastic surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 36:519–526CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schwarz G, Zins J (2011) Correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluation with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67(1):12–13CrossRef Schwarz G, Zins J (2011) Correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluation with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67(1):12–13CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Adamson AA, Zavod MB (2006) Changing perceptions of beauty: a surgeon’s perspective. Facial Plast Surg 22:188–193CrossRef Adamson AA, Zavod MB (2006) Changing perceptions of beauty: a surgeon’s perspective. Facial Plast Surg 22:188–193CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hwang K, Park JY, Hwang SW (2015) A consideration of breast imagery in art as depicted through western painting. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):226–231CrossRef Hwang K, Park JY, Hwang SW (2015) A consideration of breast imagery in art as depicted through western painting. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):226–231CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Swami V, Tovée MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48:43–50CrossRef Swami V, Tovée MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48:43–50CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Voracek M, Fisher ML (2002) Shapely centrefolds? Temporal change in body measures: trend analysis. Br Med J 325:1447CrossRef Voracek M, Fisher ML (2002) Shapely centrefolds? Temporal change in body measures: trend analysis. Br Med J 325:1447CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dixson BJ, Duncan M, Dixson AF (2015) The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Arch Sex Behav 44(6):1685–1695CrossRef Dixson BJ, Duncan M, Dixson AF (2015) The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Arch Sex Behav 44(6):1685–1695CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468CrossRef Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Swanson E (2017) A measurement system and ideal breast shape. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Swanson E (2017) A measurement system and ideal breast shape. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Swanson E (2012) A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:982–992 (discussion 993) CrossRef Swanson E (2012) A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:982–992 (discussion 993) CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Avşar DK, Aygit AC, Benlier E, Top H, Taşkinalp O (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J. 30(1):44–50CrossRef Avşar DK, Aygit AC, Benlier E, Top H, Taşkinalp O (2010) Anthropometric breast measurement: a study of 385 Turkish female students. Aesthet Surg J. 30(1):44–50CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brody GS (2003) The perfect breast: Is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg 113(5):1500–1503CrossRef Brody GS (2003) The perfect breast: Is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg 113(5):1500–1503CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Liu YJ, Thomson J (2011) Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67:7–11CrossRef Liu YJ, Thomson J (2011) Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg 67:7–11CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Martinovic ME, Blanchet NP (2017) BFACE: a framework for evaluating breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(2):287e–295eCrossRef Martinovic ME, Blanchet NP (2017) BFACE: a framework for evaluating breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(2):287e–295eCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sheldon WH, Stevens SS, Tucker WB (1940) The varieties of human physique. Harper, New York Sheldon WH, Stevens SS, Tucker WB (1940) The varieties of human physique. Harper, New York
20.
go back to reference del Yerro J, Martin L, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs T (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “Number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1404CrossRef del Yerro J, Martin L, Vegas MR, Fernandez V, Moreno E, Sanz I, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs T (2013) Selecting the implant height in breast augmentation with anatomical prosthesis: the “Number Y”. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1404CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Atiyeh B, Dibo S (2014) Preoperative assessment tool for planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(5):878–886CrossRef Atiyeh B, Dibo S (2014) Preoperative assessment tool for planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(5):878–886CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Atiyeh B, Ibrahim A, Saba S, Karamanoukian R, Chahine F, Papazian N (2017) The infra-mammary fold (IMF): a poorly appreciated landmark in prosthetic/alloplastic breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery—personal experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):806–814CrossRef Atiyeh B, Ibrahim A, Saba S, Karamanoukian R, Chahine F, Papazian N (2017) The infra-mammary fold (IMF): a poorly appreciated landmark in prosthetic/alloplastic breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery—personal experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):806–814CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Serra-Mestre JM, Fernandez Peñuela R, Foti V, D’Andrea F, Serra-Renom JM (2017) Breast cleavage remodeling with fat grafting: a safe way to optimize symmetry and to reduce intermammary distance. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):665e–672eCrossRef Serra-Mestre JM, Fernandez Peñuela R, Foti V, D’Andrea F, Serra-Renom JM (2017) Breast cleavage remodeling with fat grafting: a safe way to optimize symmetry and to reduce intermammary distance. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):665e–672eCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lassus C (1999) Update on vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2289–2298CrossRef Lassus C (1999) Update on vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2289–2298CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Brown TP, Ringrose C, Hyland RE et al (1999) A method of as- sessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 52:355–359CrossRef Brown TP, Ringrose C, Hyland RE et al (1999) A method of as- sessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 52:355–359CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, Trogen C, Selvaggi G (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesthet Plast Surg 40(5):724–732CrossRef Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, Trogen C, Selvaggi G (2016) The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesthet Plast Surg 40(5):724–732CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Khan HA, Bayat A (2008) A geometric method for nipple localization. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):45–47CrossRef Khan HA, Bayat A (2008) A geometric method for nipple localization. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):45–47CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2013) A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:65–73CrossRef Tebbetts JB (2013) A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:65–73CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D (2003) Breast–areola–nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):510–513CrossRef Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D (2003) Breast–areola–nipple proportion. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):510–513CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, Liu YJ, Shah A, Patel A, Persing JA, Thomson JG (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, Liu YJ, Shah A, Patel A, Persing JA, Thomson JG (2015) Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 74(6):639–644CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sharif SP (2017) Development and psychometric evaluation of the breast size satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 30(8):717–727CrossRef Sharif SP (2017) Development and psychometric evaluation of the breast size satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 30(8):717–727CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Prantl L, Gründl M (2011) Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: an experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(5):693–702CrossRef Prantl L, Gründl M (2011) Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: an experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(5):693–702CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Raposio E, Belgrano V, Santi PL, Chiorri C (2016) Which is the ideal breast size? Some social clues for plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 76:340–345CrossRef Raposio E, Belgrano V, Santi PL, Chiorri C (2016) Which is the ideal breast size? Some social clues for plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 76:340–345CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals. J Psychol 132:87–94CrossRef Barber N (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals. J Psychol 132:87–94CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zelazniewicz AM, Pawlowski B (2011) Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted versus unrestricted). Arch Sex Behav 40(6):1129–1135CrossRef Zelazniewicz AM, Pawlowski B (2011) Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted versus unrestricted). Arch Sex Behav 40(6):1129–1135CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Yang J, Zhang R, Shen J, Hu Y, Lv Q (2015) The three-dimensional techniques in the objective measurement of breast aesthetics. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(6):910–915CrossRef Yang J, Zhang R, Shen J, Hu Y, Lv Q (2015) The three-dimensional techniques in the objective measurement of breast aesthetics. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(6):910–915CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kim H, Mun GH, Wiraatmadja ES, Lim SY, Pyon JK, Oh KS, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Bang SI (2015) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(3):369–376CrossRef Kim H, Mun GH, Wiraatmadja ES, Lim SY, Pyon JK, Oh KS, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Bang SI (2015) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(3):369–376CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hwang K, Park JY, Hwang SW (2015) a consideration of breast imagery in art as depicted through western painting. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):226–231CrossRef Hwang K, Park JY, Hwang SW (2015) a consideration of breast imagery in art as depicted through western painting. Arch Plast Surg 42(2):226–231CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hsia HC, Thomson JG (2003) Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(1):312–320CrossRef Hsia HC, Thomson JG (2003) Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(1):312–320CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Xi W, Perdanasari AT, Ong Y, Han S, Min P, Su W, Feng S, Pacchioni L, Zhang YX, Lazzeri D (2014) Objective breast volume, shape and surface area assessment: a systematic review of breast measurement methods. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(6):1116–1130CrossRef Xi W, Perdanasari AT, Ong Y, Han S, Min P, Su W, Feng S, Pacchioni L, Zhang YX, Lazzeri D (2014) Objective breast volume, shape and surface area assessment: a systematic review of breast measurement methods. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(6):1116–1130CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Patel N (2008) Discussion: numeric expression of aesthetics and beauty. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:217–219CrossRef Patel N (2008) Discussion: numeric expression of aesthetics and beauty. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:217–219CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Qiao Q, Zhou G, Ling Y (1997) Breast volume measurement in young Chinese women and clinical applications. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:362–368CrossRef Qiao Q, Zhou G, Ling Y (1997) Breast volume measurement in young Chinese women and clinical applications. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:362–368CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:313–320CrossRef Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:313–320CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Longo B, Farcomeni A, Ferri G, Campanale A, Sorotos M, Santanelli F (2013) The BREAST-V: a unifying predictive formula for volume assessment in small, medium, and large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1eCrossRef Longo B, Farcomeni A, Ferri G, Campanale A, Sorotos M, Santanelli F (2013) The BREAST-V: a unifying predictive formula for volume assessment in small, medium, and large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1eCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Metrics of the Aesthetically Perfect Breast
Authors
Bishara Atiye
Fadel Chahine
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1154-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue