Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Article

Transaxillary Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: Experience with 160 Cases

Authors: Rubem Lang Stümpfle, Lucas Figueras Pereira-Lima, André Alves Valiati, Guilherme da Silva Mazzini

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Muscle-splitting breast augmentation, initially described by Baxter and later popularized by Khan, has proved to be an effective technique in terms of implant coverage, bypassing, and even solving of some issues associated with the dual-plane technique. A muscle-splitting breast augmentation technique recently has been used in combination with mastopexy. However, no reports have described muscle-splitting techniques accomplished by the transaxillary route.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes and complications of a novel approach to a specific breast augmentation technique. A total of 160 patients underwent bilateral transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation between October 2007 and July 2010. All the patients were treated on an outpatient basis and received epidural anesthesia. Soft, round, textured, cohesive gel implants ranging in size from 200 to 350 ml were used.

Results

All the patients recovered quickly. To date, no infection, capsular contracture, rippling, double-bubble deformity, muscle contracture-associated deformities, or implant migration has occurred. Four patients (2.5%) experienced hematomas, all of which resolved before discharge. All the patients were discharged less than 24 h postoperatively and had an aesthetically natural result.

Conclusion

Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation, a novel approach to a technique that has been described previously, provides consistent, satisfactory results and good reproducibility. This new approach provides an excellent anatomic final appearance with no risk of displacement, rippling, double-bubble deformity, or contracture-associated deformities. Furthermore, this technique avoids any visible scars on the breast and features a low complication rate.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Baxter RA (2010) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(3):426–429CrossRef Baxter RA (2010) Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(3):426–429CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: part I: a review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1761–1768PubMedCrossRef Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: part I: a review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1761–1768PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373–376PubMed Hoehler H (1973) Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373–376PubMed
5.
go back to reference Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef Khan UD (2007) Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:553–558CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using the muscle-splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khan UD (2010) Augmentation mastopexy in muscle-splitting biplane: outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:313–321CrossRef Khan UD (2010) Augmentation mastopexy in muscle-splitting biplane: outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:313–321CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Luan J, Mu D, Mu L (2009) Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef Luan J, Mu D, Mu L (2009) Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark GB (2005) Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564PubMedCrossRef Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, Bannasch H, Borges J, Ryu SM, Stark GB (2005) Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:558–564PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Niechajev I (2010) Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:322–329PubMedCrossRef Niechajev I (2010) Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:322–329PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36:49–61 viPubMedCrossRef Pacella SJ, Codner MA (2009) The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36:49–61 viPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef Pereira LH, Sterodimas A (2009) Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:752–759CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Peterson R (1979) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Paper presented at American Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting. Toronto, ON, Canada Peterson R (1979) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Paper presented at American Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting. Toronto, ON, Canada
14.
go back to reference Ramirez OM, Heller MDL, Tebbetts JB (2002) Dual-plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198 Author reply 1198–1199PubMedCrossRef Ramirez OM, Heller MDL, Tebbetts JB (2002) Dual-plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198 Author reply 1198–1199PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed Tebbetts JB, Adams WP (2005) Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high-five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005–2016PubMed
Metadata
Title
Transaxillary Muscle-Splitting Breast Augmentation: Experience with 160 Cases
Authors
Rubem Lang Stümpfle
Lucas Figueras Pereira-Lima
André Alves Valiati
Guilherme da Silva Mazzini
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9830-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2012 Go to the issue