Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Paper

The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects

Authors: Yuanqing Mao, Chen Xu, Jiawei Xu, Huiwu Li, Fengxiang Liu, Degang Yu, Zhenan Zhu

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging if severe periacetabular bone loss is present. Here we describe a method that uses a customised cage to reconstruct an acetabulum with a massive bone defect.

Methods

Designed with the aid of the rapid prototyping technique, a customised cage with a hook, crest and flange or braids was made, and then utilized to reconstruct severe compromised acetabulum in revision THA since 2001. Twenty-two patients (23 hips) were included in this study. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 60.9 years (range, 38–80 years). Three hips had massive acetabular bone defects of Paprosky type IIIA and 20 of type IIIB. The Harris hip score was used to evaluate hip function. Radiographs were taken to evaluate loosening of the cage and resorption of allograft bone.

Results

The average follow up was 81.6 ± 24.9 months. The mean Harris hip score improved from 39.6 pre-operatively to 80.9 at the final follow-up. There were no instances of deep infection, severe venous thrombosis, and nerve palsy. One patient who had an intra-operative rupture of the superior acetabular artery was successfully treated using the haemostatic suturing technique. Two patients experienced dislocation at post-operative days four and six, respectively, and both were treated with closed reduction and skin traction for three weeks.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that a customised cage may be a promising option for THA revision of severely compromised acetabula. Extended follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term performance of this approach.
Literature
1.
2.
4.
go back to reference Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39:1–8CrossRef Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39:1–8CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J 95-B:166–172. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30608 CrossRefPubMed Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J 95-B:166–172. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​95B2.​30608 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Steno B, Kokavec M, Necas L (2015) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop 39:389–395CrossRefPubMed Steno B, Kokavec M, Necas L (2015) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop 39:389–395CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44CrossRefPubMed Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed
10.
go back to reference Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM (1995) Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplast 10:307–312CrossRef Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM (1995) Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplast 10:307–312CrossRef
11.
go back to reference DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32 DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32
12.
go back to reference Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME (2000) The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. J Arthroplast 15:1–7CrossRef Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME (2000) The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. J Arthroplast 15:1–7CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pazzaglia UE (1990) Pathology of the bone-cement interface in loosening of total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:83–88CrossRefPubMed Pazzaglia UE (1990) Pathology of the bone-cement interface in loosening of total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:83–88CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gross AE (1999) Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:198–207 Gross AE (1999) Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:198–207
15.
go back to reference Zagorodniy N, Nikolaev I, Nuzhdin V, Kagramanov S (2014) Prospective cohort study of six hundred and sixty four revisions of loose failed acetabular implants. Int Orthop 38:2021–2025CrossRefPubMed Zagorodniy N, Nikolaev I, Nuzhdin V, Kagramanov S (2014) Prospective cohort study of six hundred and sixty four revisions of loose failed acetabular implants. Int Orthop 38:2021–2025CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gross AE (2006) Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005. J Arthroplast 21:117–120CrossRef Gross AE (2006) Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005. J Arthroplast 21:117–120CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Friedrich MJ, Schmolders J, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2014) Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:2455–2461CrossRefPubMed Friedrich MJ, Schmolders J, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2014) Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:2455–2461CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216–227 Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216–227
22.
23.
go back to reference Joshi AB, Lee J, Christensen C (2002) Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplast 17:643–648CrossRef Joshi AB, Lee J, Christensen C (2002) Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplast 17:643–648CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Holt GE, Dennis DA (2004) Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:209–214 Holt GE, Dennis DA (2004) Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:209–214
26.
go back to reference Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168 Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168
27.
go back to reference Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK, Laitinen M (2013) Orthopaedic reconstruction of complex pelvic bone defects. Evaluation of various treatment methods. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finnish Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc 102:36–41 Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK, Laitinen M (2013) Orthopaedic reconstruction of complex pelvic bone defects. Evaluation of various treatment methods. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finnish Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc 102:36–41
29.
32.
go back to reference Schreurs BW, Keurentjes JC, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP (2009) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20- to 25-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91:1148–1153. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.21750 CrossRef Schreurs BW, Keurentjes JC, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Veth RP (2009) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20- to 25-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91:1148–1153. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​91B9.​21750 CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW (2011) Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:367–371. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01532 CrossRefPubMed Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW (2011) Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:367–371. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​I.​01532 CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Pariat J, Queinnec S, Homma Y, Lachaniette CHF, Chevallier N, Rouard H (2014) Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:1913–1921CrossRefPubMed Hernigou P, Pariat J, Queinnec S, Homma Y, Lachaniette CHF, Chevallier N, Rouard H (2014) Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:1913–1921CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects
Authors
Yuanqing Mao
Chen Xu
Jiawei Xu
Huiwu Li
Fengxiang Liu
Degang Yu
Zhenan Zhu
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2965-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

International Orthopaedics 10/2015 Go to the issue