Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Paper

Bone stock in revision femoral arthroplasty: a new evaluation

Authors: François Canovas, Julien Girard, Olivier Roche, Henri Migaud, François Bonnomet, Mathias Goldschild, Pierre Le Béguec

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to finalize a method allowing a qualitative and numerical evaluation of the bone stock and to confirm its reproducibility, to verify the relationship between the secondary bone stock value and the functional results, and to determine the main factors influencing the value of the bone stock.

Methods

A clinical and radiological evaluation was performed in a group of 150 revisions of total hip replacements according to a new method taking into account cortical bone thickness, bone density and bone defects.

Results

Interobserver reproducibility was evaluated at an average of 0.6 and intra-observer reproducibility was considered good at 0.8. Between the initial bone stock and at the last follow-up, no significant difference was noticed. For secondary bone stock considered as “very good or good”, the gain was +38.1 points versus +29.9 points for patients evaluated as “average or poor” (p < 0.0001). Between the initial bone stock assessment and at last follow-up, a significant relation was found in numerical values for the global type of primary fixation and in the presence of osteopenia (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Deficient secondary bone stock can result in less favourable functional results. The numerical scores confirm the importance of strategic choices during surgery in order to manage bone stock preservation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous surfaced femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128PubMed Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous surfaced femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D (2011) Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 35:275–282PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D (2011) Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 35:275–282PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Engh CA, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Kassapidis E (1998) Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:168–178PubMed Engh CA, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Kassapidis E (1998) Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:168–178PubMed
4.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230–242PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230–242PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Le Béguec P, Canovas F, Roche O, Goldschild M, Batard J (2014) Uncemented femoral stems for revision surgery. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland Le Béguec P, Canovas F, Roche O, Goldschild M, Batard J (2014) Uncemented femoral stems for revision surgery. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
6.
go back to reference Wagner H (1987) Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopade 16:295–300PubMed Wagner H (1987) Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopade 16:295–300PubMed
8.
go back to reference Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55 Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55
9.
go back to reference Boisgard S, Moreau PE, Tixier H, Levai JP (2001) Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-months follow up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:147–154PubMed Boisgard S, Moreau PE, Tixier H, Levai JP (2001) Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-months follow up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:147–154PubMed
10.
go back to reference Iwana D, Nishii T, Miki H, Miki H, Sugano N, Sakai T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H (2008) Proximal bone remodelling differed between two types of titanium long femoral components after cementless revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:431–436PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Iwana D, Nishii T, Miki H, Miki H, Sugano N, Sakai T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H (2008) Proximal bone remodelling differed between two types of titanium long femoral components after cementless revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:431–436PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13 year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839–847PubMedCrossRef Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13 year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839–847PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture. Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–754PubMed Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture. Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–754PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27PubMed Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hofmann A, Wiatt R, France P, Bigler G, Danies AU, Hes WE (1989) Endostable bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 245:138–144PubMed Hofmann A, Wiatt R, France P, Bigler G, Danies AU, Hes WE (1989) Endostable bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 245:138–144PubMed
15.
go back to reference de Menezes DF, Le Béguec P, Sieber HP, Goldschild M (2012) Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:883–888PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Menezes DF, Le Béguec P, Sieber HP, Goldschild M (2012) Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:883–888PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55–62PubMedCrossRef Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55–62PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vives P, De Lestang M, Pallot R, Cazeneuve JF (1989) Aseptic loosening. Definition-classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 75(Suppl I):29–31 Vives P, De Lestang M, Pallot R, Cazeneuve JF (1989) Aseptic loosening. Definition-classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 75(Suppl I):29–31
18.
go back to reference Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ II, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr (1997) The long-term clinical consequences of stress shielding in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1007–1012PubMed Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ II, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr (1997) The long-term clinical consequences of stress shielding in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1007–1012PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kowalczewski JB, Rutkowska-Sak L, Marczak D, Slowinsla I, Slowinski R, Sibinski M (2013) Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements. Int Orthop 37(4):595–598PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kowalczewski JB, Rutkowska-Sak L, Marczak D, Slowinsla I, Slowinski R, Sibinski M (2013) Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements. Int Orthop 37(4):595–598PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kinkel S, Thomsen MN, Nadorf J, Heisel C, Tanner MC, Jakubowitz E (2014) Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis. Int Orthop 38(6):1147–1153PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kinkel S, Thomsen MN, Nadorf J, Heisel C, Tanner MC, Jakubowitz E (2014) Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis. Int Orthop 38(6):1147–1153PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley GA, Gie GA, Ling RSM (2003) Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:809–817 Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley GA, Gie GA, Ling RSM (2003) Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:809–817
24.
go back to reference Huiskes R, Weinans H, Van Rietbergen B (1992) The relationship between stress-shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:124–134PubMed Huiskes R, Weinans H, Van Rietbergen B (1992) The relationship between stress-shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:124–134PubMed
25.
go back to reference Meunier A, Christel P, Sedel L, Witwoet J, Blanquaert D (1990) Influence du module d’élasticité des tiges fémorales de prothèses totales de hanche et de la colorette sur la répartition des déformations du fémur. Int Orthop 14:67–73PubMedCrossRef Meunier A, Christel P, Sedel L, Witwoet J, Blanquaert D (1990) Influence du module d’élasticité des tiges fémorales de prothèses totales de hanche et de la colorette sur la répartition des déformations du fémur. Int Orthop 14:67–73PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Sieber C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Sieber C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bone stock in revision femoral arthroplasty: a new evaluation
Authors
François Canovas
Julien Girard
Olivier Roche
Henri Migaud
François Bonnomet
Mathias Goldschild
Pierre Le Béguec
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2647-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

International Orthopaedics 8/2015 Go to the issue