Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Paper

Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis

Authors: Stefan Kinkel, Marc N. Thomsen, Jan Nadorf, Christian Heisel, Michael C. Tanner, Eike Jakubowitz

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In total hip arthroplasty fixation of revision stems can be demanding due to femoral bone loss. Strut grafts are often used for bone augmentation and stabilization of the newly inserted prosthesis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of strut grafts on primary stability under various stem fixation conditions.

Methods

Two different revision stems (cylindrical and conical shape) were implanted into synthetic femora. Following a semicircular transfemoral osteotomy, three deficient femoral bearings were simulated (bony lid reattached with cable wires; weakened lid reattached with cable wires; strut grafts placed to the weakened lid with cable wires). Relative micro-movements were measured between prostheses and bones due to an axial moment applied to the stems.

Results

Relative movements correlated to the stem shape. The cylindrical stem showed higher movements increasing significantly with a weakened bony lid and portrayed a slight decrease of movements with strut graft application. No unequivocal influence of the weakened lid could be detected for the conical implant. Strut graft application did not show an additional stabilizing effect.

Conclusions

The primary stability of the cylindrical fixation concept decreases with impaired fixation conditions of the femur. A clear restabilizing effect with strut grafts could not be proven. A decrease of primary stability due to the impaired bone could not be observed for the conical stem shape. Additionally, strut grafts do not enhance fixation for this stem shape. We conclude that surgeons should not rely on a stabilizing effect of strut grafts in revision hip surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2000) Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect 49:83–96PubMed Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2000) Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect 49:83–96PubMed
2.
go back to reference Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE (1991) Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:235–240PubMed Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE (1991) Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:235–240PubMed
3.
go back to reference Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Loer F (2001) Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387:148–155PubMedCrossRef Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Loer F (2001) Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 387:148–155PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z (1997) Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 12:403–415PubMedCrossRef Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z (1997) Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 12:403–415PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK (1995) Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 319:130–140PubMed Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK (1995) Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 319:130–140PubMed
6.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC (1992) Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:35–44PubMed Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC (1992) Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:35–44PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I (2002) The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect 51:103–113PubMed Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I (2002) The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect 51:103–113PubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Kim YH, Kim JS (2005) Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty 20:454–459PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS (2005) Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty 20:454–459PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:172–178PubMed Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:172–178PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hamer AJ, Suvarna SK, Stockley I (1997) Histologic evidence of cortical allograft bone incorporation in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:785–789PubMedCrossRef Hamer AJ, Suvarna SK, Stockley I (1997) Histologic evidence of cortical allograft bone incorporation in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:785–789PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E (1977) Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11:811–838PubMedCrossRef Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E (1977) Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11:811–838PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:45–55PubMed Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:45–55PubMed
14.
go back to reference Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113PubMed Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP (2004) Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2720–2725PubMed Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP (2004) Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2720–2725PubMed
16.
go back to reference Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH (2000) Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 49:131–139PubMed Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH (2000) Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 49:131–139PubMed
17.
go back to reference Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC (2004) The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:314–321PubMedCrossRef Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC (2004) The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:314–321PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:306–309PubMedCrossRef Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:306–309PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jakubowitz E, Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2008) Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. J Biomech 41:3078–3084PubMedCrossRef Jakubowitz E, Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2008) Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. J Biomech 41:3078–3084PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Görtz W, Nägerl UV, Nägerl H, Thomsen M (2002) Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124:706–713PubMedCrossRef Görtz W, Nägerl UV, Nägerl H, Thomsen M (2002) Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124:706–713PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schmidbauer U, Brendel T, Kunze KG, Nietert M, Ecke H (1993) Dynamic force measurement in implantation of total endoprostheses of the hip joint. Unfallchirurgie 19:11–15PubMedCrossRef Schmidbauer U, Brendel T, Kunze KG, Nietert M, Ecke H (1993) Dynamic force measurement in implantation of total endoprostheses of the hip joint. Unfallchirurgie 19:11–15PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 26:969–990PubMedCrossRef Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 26:969–990PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:133–139PubMed D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296:133–139PubMed
24.
go back to reference Cameron HU (1994) The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:47–53PubMed Cameron HU (1994) The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:47–53PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A (1996) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 29:525–535PubMedCrossRef Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A (1996) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 29:525–535PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis
Authors
Stefan Kinkel
Marc N. Thomsen
Jan Nadorf
Christian Heisel
Michael C. Tanner
Eike Jakubowitz
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2257-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

International Orthopaedics 6/2014 Go to the issue