Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2018

01-07-2018

Evaluation of an abbreviated screening MRI protocol for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors: Jennifer Y. Lee, Eugene J. Huo, Stefanie Weinstein, Charmaine Santos, Alexander Monto, Carlos U. Corvera, Judy Yee, Thomas A. Hope

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we compare an abbreviated screening MRI protocol (aMRI), utilizing only dynamic contrast-enhanced images, to a conventional liver MRI (cMRI) for the characterization of observations in at-risk patients.

Materials and methods

164 consecutive HCC screening MRIs were retrospectively analyzed. Two sets of de-identified image sets were created: one with all acquired sequences including T2- and diffusion-weighted sequences (cMRI), and one with only T1-weighted precontrast and dynamic post-contrast images utilizing an extracellular gadolinium contrast agent (aMRI). Three readers assigned a LI-RADS score based on the lesion with the highest LI-RADS category using the aMRI and cMRI datasets during separate reads.

Results

There was no change between the aMRI and cMRI LI-RADS categorization in 93%, 96%, and 96% of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the majority of the discrepant cases, the score increased from LI-RADS 3 to LI-RADS 4 due to the presence of ancillary features on T2 and DWI. Kappa values for interobserver variability demonstrated fair-to-moderate LI-RADS agreement among the 3 readers.

Conclusion

There was strong agreement between the abbreviated T1-only MRI protocol and a full liver MRI, with only 5% of cases changing LI-RADS categorization due to the inclusion of T2 and DWI. The estimated time to run this abbreviated MRI is approximately 7–10 min, possibly allowing for a more cost-effective screening MRI than our cMRIs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stewart BW, Wild C (2014) World cancer report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer Stewart BW, Wild C (2014) World cancer report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer
2.
go back to reference Andersson KL, Salomon JA, Goldie SJ, Chung RT (2008) Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1418–1424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andersson KL, Salomon JA, Goldie SJ, Chung RT (2008) Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1418–1424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, et al. (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. CME. Am J Gastroenterol 101:513–523CrossRefPubMed Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, et al. (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. CME. Am J Gastroenterol 101:513–523CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Cruite I, Tang A, Sirlin CB (2013) Imaging-based diagnostic systems for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 201:41–55CrossRef Cruite I, Tang A, Sirlin CB (2013) Imaging-based diagnostic systems for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 201:41–55CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 212:876–884CrossRefPubMed Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. (1999) Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 212:876–884CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D, Jaffe TA, Bashir MR (2014) Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 271:426–434CrossRefPubMed Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D, Jaffe TA, Bashir MR (2014) Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 271:426–434CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 275:97–109CrossRefPubMed Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 275:97–109CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ikram NS, Yee J, Weinstein S, et al. (2017) Multiple arterial phase MRI of arterial hypervascular hepatic lesions: improved arterial phase capture and lesion enhancement. Abdom Radiol 42:870–876CrossRef Ikram NS, Yee J, Weinstein S, et al. (2017) Multiple arterial phase MRI of arterial hypervascular hepatic lesions: improved arterial phase capture and lesion enhancement. Abdom Radiol 42:870–876CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kee K-M, Lu S-N (2017) Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:277–279CrossRefPubMed Kee K-M, Lu S-N (2017) Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:277–279CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ehman EC, Behr SC, Umetsu SE, et al. (2016) Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas. Abdom Radiol 41:963–969CrossRef Ehman EC, Behr SC, Umetsu SE, et al. (2016) Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas. Abdom Radiol 41:963–969CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Liu PSC, et al. (2014) Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology 272:132–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Liu PSC, et al. (2014) Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology 272:132–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of an abbreviated screening MRI protocol for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors
Jennifer Y. Lee
Eugene J. Huo
Stefanie Weinstein
Charmaine Santos
Alexander Monto
Carlos U. Corvera
Judy Yee
Thomas A. Hope
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1339-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Abdominal Radiology 7/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.