Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2015

01-02-2015

Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis

Authors: Atul B. Shinagare, Ivan K. Ip, Ali S. Raja, V. Anik Sahni, Peter Banks, Ramin Khorasani

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assess the utility of CT and MRI in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) presenting to emergency department (ED).

Materials and Methods

In this Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study, we identified all patients with AP from March 2012 through February 2013 in ED of a teaching hospital with approximately 60,000 annual visits. Patients were initially identified via ICD-9 code for AP (577.0); diagnosis was confirmed by chart review using established diagnostic criteria (presence of two of the following: typical abdominal pain, elevated lipase/amylase >3 times normal, or imaging findings of pancreatitis). Abdominal CT or MRI obtained in the ED and within 24 h of admission was reviewed by a fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist.

Results

Of 101 patients admitted with AP (60 women, 41 men; mean age 52 years, range 20–89), 63 (62.4%) underwent imaging; only one (1.6%) showed pancreatic necrosis. 88 (87.1%) patients could have been clinically diagnosed without imaging based on presence of abdominal pain and elevated laboratory values; 13 (12.9%) required imaging for diagnosis. Of 88 patients who met AP diagnostic criteria without imaging, 50 (56.8%) nonetheless underwent imaging, with AP without necrosis seen in 34 (68.0%), pancreatic necrosis in one (2.0%), sequelae of prior AP in four (8.0%), and no abnormality in 11 (22.0%).

Conclusion

Early imaging is common in patients with AP, even when the diagnosis can be established based on non-imaging criteria, rarely demonstrating pancreatic necrosis. Reducing overuse of early imaging in patients with confident diagnosis of AP may improve quality and reduce waste.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedCrossRef Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61(6):443–451PubMed Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61(6):443–451PubMed
6.
go back to reference Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (1986) Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 1(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (1986) Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 1(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2(8656):201–205PubMedCrossRef Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2(8656):201–205PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. (2009) A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):966–971PubMedCrossRef Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. (2009) A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):966–971PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spanier BWM, Nio Y, van der Hulst RWM, et al. (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 10(2–3):222–228PubMedCrossRef Spanier BWM, Nio Y, van der Hulst RWM, et al. (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 10(2–3):222–228PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Forsmark CE, Baillie J, AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board (2007) AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 132(5):2022–2044PubMedCrossRef Forsmark CE, Baillie J, AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board (2007) AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 132(5):2022–2044PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, et al. (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital—analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258(1):174–181PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, et al. (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital—analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258(1):174–181PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Gabbrielli A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic assessment and outcome of acute pancreatitis in Italy: results of a prospective multicentre study. ProInf-AISP: Progetto informatizzato pancreatite acuta, Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas, phase II. Dig Liver Dis 39(9):829–837PubMedCrossRef Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Gabbrielli A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic assessment and outcome of acute pancreatitis in Italy: results of a prospective multicentre study. ProInf-AISP: Progetto informatizzato pancreatite acuta, Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas, phase II. Dig Liver Dis 39(9):829–837PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54(Suppl 3):1–9 Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54(Suppl 3):1–9
19.
go back to reference Toosie K, Chang L, Renslo R, et al. (1997) Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 63(10):904–907PubMed Toosie K, Chang L, Renslo R, et al. (1997) Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 63(10):904–907PubMed
20.
go back to reference Spanier BWM, Bruno MJ (2011) Use of early CT scanning in patients with acute pancreatitis. Radiology 260(2):606PubMedCrossRef Spanier BWM, Bruno MJ (2011) Use of early CT scanning in patients with acute pancreatitis. Radiology 260(2):606PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619PubMedCrossRef Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R, et al. (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R, et al. (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yegneswaran B, Pitchumoni CS (2010) When should serum amylase and lipase levels be repeated in a patient with acute pancreatitis? Cleve Clin J Med 77(4):230–231PubMedCrossRef Yegneswaran B, Pitchumoni CS (2010) When should serum amylase and lipase levels be repeated in a patient with acute pancreatitis? Cleve Clin J Med 77(4):230–231PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis
Authors
Atul B. Shinagare
Ivan K. Ip
Ali S. Raja
V. Anik Sahni
Peter Banks
Ramin Khorasani
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0210-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Abdominal Radiology 2/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.