Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2013

01-04-2013

Dose reduction methods for CT colonography

Authors: Kevin J. Chang, Judy Yee

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients, referring physicians, the media, and government agencies have all expressed concern over the risks of medical radiation, particularly as it relates to CT. This concern is particularly paramount when associated with a screening examination such as CT colonography. These theoretical risks must be weighed realistically against the substantial benefits of colon cancer screening as well as against the risks inherent in the major alternative screening option, optical colonoscopy. When put into perspective, the risk–benefit ratio is highly in favor of the performance of CT colonography. Nevertheless, in following the ALARA principle, there is an ever increasing armamentarium of options that can be employed in the pursuit of CT radiation dose reduction, all of which can be used in many synergistic combinations allowing for dose reduction while simultaneously preserving image quality and minimizing image noise. After a brief tutorial on estimating radiation dose, various strategies will be discussed including reductions in tube current and tube voltage as well as the use of automatic dose modulation and iterative reconstruction. Other practical considerations will also be reviewed including proper patient isocentering, optimization of colonic insufflation to minimize additional decubitus scans, proper choice of scan volumes to avoid overranging, and variation of slice thickness and window width to minimize perceived image noise. Finally, a strategy for how to incrementally introduce these methods as well as a way to compare dose reduction efforts across institutions throughout the country will be offered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129(1):328–337PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129(1):328–337PubMedCrossRef
2.
7.
go back to reference Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(3):230–236PubMedCrossRef Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(3):230–236PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ogden K, Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT. Health Phys 86(4):397–405PubMedCrossRef Ogden K, Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT. Health Phys 86(4):397–405PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W (2010) Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(6):1342–1346. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3331 PubMedCrossRef Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W (2010) Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(6):1342–1346. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​3331 PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dachman AH, Laghi A (2010) Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. New York: Springer, p 103 Dachman AH, Laghi A (2010) Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. New York: Springer, p 103
14.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224(1):25–33PubMedCrossRef van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224(1):25–33PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Cohnen M, Vogt C, Beck A, et al. (2004) Feasibility of MDCT colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1355–1359PubMedCrossRef Cohnen M, Vogt C, Beck A, et al. (2004) Feasibility of MDCT colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1355–1359PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Haaga JR, Miraldi F, MacIntyre W, et al. (1981) The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology 138(2):449–454PubMed Haaga JR, Miraldi F, MacIntyre W, et al. (1981) The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology 138(2):449–454PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26(11):2248–2253PubMedCrossRef Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26(11):2248–2253PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lim HK, Lee KH, Kim SY, et al. (2011) Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control? Eur Radiol 21(2):345–352. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1922-4 PubMedCrossRef Lim HK, Lee KH, Kim SY, et al. (2011) Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control? Eur Radiol 21(2):345–352. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-010-1922-4 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Duan X, Wang J, Christner JA, et al. (2011) Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(3):689–695. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6061 PubMedCrossRef Duan X, Wang J, Christner JA, et al. (2011) Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(3):689–695. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​10.​6061 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, TenHave TR, Weaver JS (1997) The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT–shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology 205(3):853–858PubMed Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, TenHave TR, Weaver JS (1997) The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT–shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology 205(3):853–858PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hohl C, Wildberger JE, Suss C, et al. (2006) Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield. Acta Radiol 47(6):562–567PubMedCrossRef Hohl C, Wildberger JE, Suss C, et al. (2006) Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield. Acta Radiol 47(6):562–567PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lightspeed VCT Technical Reference Manual (2007) Rev 9th edn. General Electric Company, chap 12, p 25 Lightspeed VCT Technical Reference Manual (2007) Rev 9th edn. General Electric Company, chap 12, p 25
26.
go back to reference Brooks (1977) A quantitative theory of the hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning. Journal of computer assisted tomography 1(4):487–493PubMedCrossRef Brooks (1977) A quantitative theory of the hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning. Journal of computer assisted tomography 1(4):487–493PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ, Huda W, Mayo-Smith WW (2013) Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing kVp to 100 kilovolts. Radiology (in press) Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ, Huda W, Mayo-Smith WW (2013) Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing kVp to 100 kilovolts. Radiology (in press)
28.
go back to reference Guimaraes LS, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, et al. (2010) Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality. Radiology 257(3):732–742. doi:10.1148/radiol.10092016 PubMedCrossRef Guimaraes LS, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, et al. (2010) Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality. Radiology 257(3):732–742. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​10092016 PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McCollough CH (2012) Automatic kVp selection. In: MGH radiation safety in CT symposium, Boston, MA, January 31, 2012. McCollough CH (2012) Automatic kVp selection. In: MGH radiation safety in CT symposium, Boston, MA, January 31, 2012.
30.
go back to reference Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34(11):4526–4544PubMedCrossRef Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34(11):4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3855 PubMedCrossRef Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​3855 PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD, Walz-Flannigan AI, McCollough CH (2010) Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):W49–W55. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2878 PubMedCrossRef Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD, Walz-Flannigan AI, McCollough CH (2010) Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(1):W49–W55. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​2878 PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, et al. (2011) Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):1332–1338. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5698 PubMedCrossRef Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, et al. (2011) Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):1332–1338. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​10.​5698 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dose reduction methods for CT colonography
Authors
Kevin J. Chang
Judy Yee
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9968-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Abdominal Radiology 2/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.